COVID-19 Humanity Betrayal ㅤ Memory Project

Space: https://x.com/i/spaces/1vAxRQEWNjqJl

Transcript

Speaker 0 ·
Hello, and welcome to another CHBNP space. My name is Chelsea Belgoodell, and I will be your host tonight. I am joined momentarily, by our cohost, Miriam Belknap, and soon Protocol Widow. Protocol Widow, I see you now sending your cohost. It is 12/13/2025, and we are gathered here tonight as we are every Saturday night to discuss the impacts and various harms caused by COVID policies, protocols, and mandates. We are very glad you could join us tonight and look forward to another robust and insightful conversation. Welcome, protocol widow and Miriam. How are you guys doing tonight?
Speaker 1 ·
Doing well. Not looking forward to the colder temperatures that are just about to hit.
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, how strange. Do you hear that?
Speaker 1 ·
I do hear that. It was playing while you were setting up the space, and now it seems to be back.
Speaker 0 ·
Yeah. And now it's stopped again. I've I've heard this on other spaces that I've joined. I think it's like a, , filling the space of dead air that x does automatically. I do not know why it's being applied to our space tonight, and I hope it doesn't persist.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, that was partially because I backed you up. I verified that my browser tab was muted. And when I hit reconnect, that's when it started.
Speaker 0 ·
Interesting.
Speaker 2 ·
When because it did that, I just x'd out entirely. So I don't know yet whether I could back you up. We'll have to wait and see if we're gonna have,.
Speaker 2 ·
Interference? Interesting.
Speaker 2 ·
That is
Speaker 2 ·
A pain in the neck.
Speaker 0 ·
So we Yeah. I don't I don't like it. I prefer just the quiet space before we come on mic, and I hope that isn't something x will be applying to all of our spaces henceforth because that is annoying.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, it shouldn't, if x is going to start doing something like that, it should not do it when you're opening a second host window. It that should be a default where it's only in the beginning, I would think.
Speaker 0 ·
But?
Speaker 2 ·
There's lots of things that get done that we're like, I'm sorry. You're doing what? Why? I'm trying to figure out now what's the best way to prevent it from happening other than the test, , where I started up again and we see if we hear it. Try doing it again. Try reconnecting.
Speaker 0 ·
On your backup. And when it starts making the noise, just come on mic for just a second. And I have a theory that might kill the music.
Speaker 2 ·
Alright. Well, let's let's do that. Boys and girls, y'all are here for the big test case. Let's see what I just had to reopen the browser and get all hooked up. So bear with me while we play what is the answer to the question of the night. Now I am definitely muted on that tab, and I am now going to reconnect. And we are going to keep talking, and maybe.
Speaker 2 ·
There it is. Isn't that fascinating? Now can you hear me while that's going on?
Speaker 0 ·
I do hear you. Try coming on mic as COVID. Well, I am. I am I am on as protocol widow. Well, yes, protocol widow, but try coming on mic as the backup CHPM team.
Speaker 2 ·
, see? Oh.
Speaker 2 ·
So we had an echo for a second there, but I believe that resolved the issue. Yeah. What I had to do was I had to open the mic and then close it as soon as I heard all of that noise. And that so that's what it's doing. It's offering that on the main host window, and all you have to do is break it with your mic opening. Yep. I'm here. Okay. We'll keep an eye on that one. Welcome, Deborah, Miriam, and somewhere I don't know where. Glad to have you here. And, I'm hoping everybody's ready for that cold blast of air that Miriam was talking about because I'm gonna get it too.
Speaker 1 ·
I think the only person who's ready in my household is my great Pyrenees who loves cold weather and snow.
Speaker 1 ·
None of the rest of us are. Trust.
Speaker 2 ·
Me. A few of those teen temperatures, and he will bring his bare tootsies back in the house, I'm sure.
Speaker 1 ·
-huh. I certainly hope so because I'm already feeling the cold, and we're not even quite there yet. So.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, you've had some ugly winter leaning weather lately anyway, haven't you?
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. And it's been extremely weird because we had nearly three inches of snow, Thursday night going into Friday all the way, which was yesterday, all the way up till, like, 9AM in the morning. And then it literally suddenly, the temperature shot back up and completely melted three inches of snow same day.
Speaker 2 ·
Nice. Just that weird? Mean sludge. So.
Speaker 1 ·
Weird.
Speaker 0 ·
So It is bizarre. We had snow about a week ago and freezing temperatures for days. And the last several days, it's been 70 degrees in the day and nice and warm, and you would think it was, , a nice summer day.
Speaker 1 ·
It is just officially very weird, lately because that's exactly what's getting ready to happen here. We're gonna have seven to 10 degrees at night for the cup next couple of nights. And then after about two days, we're gonna be pushing 50 degrees. So weird.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. And I'm in the same basket because we were expecting low teens, , at night and really freaking cold during the day. And, but like you said, , like, Wednesday, I think, it's supposed to start going back up, and we'll be back into, , low forties at night, upper thirties at night. So that's tolerable. But I'd no. I moved out of Wisconsin. I moved off the mountain. I every time it gets cold here, I cuss my son for not moving to Florida. So hey. What can I say?
Speaker 0 ·
I'll ask Deb about Florida. It's not all it's cracked up to be, is it?
Speaker 3 ·
No.
Speaker 2 ·
I know. And she's, like, on mute. No. Mute.
Speaker 2 ·
That's funny.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, well, she's just letting her yes be yes and her no be no.
Speaker 2 ·
Apparently. Apparently. I
Speaker 2 ·
Hope everybody's doing well. I hope that everybody's able to have some preparation for Christmas. I decorated my cell my house this week. I don't know if you're on Facebook, but you might have noticed. I put the flag out by the mailbox and the flag by the front door. I'm done.
Speaker 3 ·
There's no tree. There's no light. Way ahead of me.
Speaker 2 ·
No. We're we're not doing all that other stuff.
Speaker 1 ·
Me neither. I oh, I don't I'm not even gonna bother. I don't think.
Speaker 2 ·
It's just a lot of energy then to have to pull it back down again. So Mhmm. It's like making a big meal, then all you have to do is go clean up all the dishes. I really don't see a plus to that.
Speaker 0 ·
Yeah. I'm afraid I'm I'm right there with you. I haven't been able to do anything in preparation. And, honestly, I'm just trying to maintain the spirit of Christmas and, , keep in mind that everyone's facing incredible hardship right now with everything that's going on and that's gone on. And if we can get through this, then, that will be enough of a present for me.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah., for the three of us up, , sitting across the row next to you on my screen anyway, and I think for a few others here.
Speaker 2 ·
The last five years have sucked balls. That's the best thing I can say. That's the most positive thing I can say. And we're not most of us, regardless of who you hoped would win the last election, most of us are not really getting anything we see as the full on positive results we all hoped for from the administration and are very disappointed and literally the mildest way to put it is pissed off.
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, but all the red meat, Protocol Widow. We've got a black box label going on the shots allegedly soon. Isn't that just wonderful and all we could have hoped for besides pulling them from the market? Like, what I don't understand. They're gonna acknowledge that they're deadly, but also.
Speaker 2 ·
Keep taking them. Well and, , the thing that gives me a little bit of heart on this is seeing a few of the YouTubers, and that are actually speaking up. Some of them have been afraid to talk because they're afraid they're gonna get demonetized or have their videos pulled down or whatever. And I'm I'm seeing this. Oh, great.
Speaker 2 ·
So we're gonna and they said exactly what you just said. Now it's marked as dangerous, but that doesn't stop the advertisements on the TV. Or every time you walk into the pharmacy, you hear, come get your flu shot. Come get your COVID shot. Come get your RSV. They, it is really it's really nice to hear that from people other than the ones who come to this room. It is nice,.
Speaker 2 ·
But I don't know what the answer is. I really don't because I'm I'm, like, , wishing I had a megaphone screaming.
Speaker 3 ·
This what, though? The sad part is even when they say they're like, I'm gonna use the chemtrails for an example. Here in Florida, DeSantis outlawed them.
Speaker 3 ·
They outlaw them, but they don't enforce it. Exactly.
Speaker 2 ·
Bingo.
Speaker 2 ·
They're supposed to be outlawed in Tennessee. I'm not in Tennessee, but from what I can tell from what people are posting, they're not outlawed. They're they're still here.
Speaker 1 ·
That's what's so maddening is you look at it and you think, am I losing my mind? Because in what world what world does it make any sense that you're gonna put a black box on something, you're gonna admit it killed 10 kids, and you're still gonna leave it there.
Speaker 3 ·
And you're still gonna why, Miriam? Because nobody's because people still aren't gonna read them. That's why. And they'll get away with it, but they all they got it. At least it says it. Yeah.
Speaker 1 ·
It's a it's a, , oh, well, we warned them plausible that and liability. Well, I got news for you. Lots of people warned people, and people don't they don't seem to care to pay attention until something happens to them. And it just it's maddening. Absolutely maddening.
Speaker 2 ·
I don't know what the answer will be. I.
Speaker 2 ·
Mean, we, with our little teeny space, have been very,.
Speaker 2 ·
Consistent with our message, and we're consistent with our messaging on social media, but we don't have the reach of and the other frustrating part that we have is I keep hearing my husband, and some of you will appreciate this, because he it used to drive him nuts. I.
Speaker 2 ·
I used to listen to conservative radio.
Speaker 0 ·
All the time.
Speaker 2 ·
And, , yeah, he'd listen to Fox, but most of the time, he'd turn on some hunting show and watch some poor deer get killed. And, it drove him nuts that I was watch listening to conservative radio all the time. And he'd go, would you turn that damn thing off? And I said, look. I think it's important that I'm aware of what's going on. At least I'm hearing what's going on in Washington, and I think that's important. And he said, it really doesn't make a damn difference. They're just gonna do whatever they wanna do anyway. What? The man was right.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I have to say my husband had the same opinion. He was he, , obviously, was patriotic, loved his country, everything, but he kinda saw it for what it was. And that was his exact attitude was, it doesn't matter. It's gonna swing from one side to the other, from one side to the other because, basically, , he didn't have this phrase because it just became common. But his take on it was it was it was the year. One side, the other. One side, the other. It's a show. It's to keep the masses occupied and polarized. And he it was he was, dead on, I think.
Speaker 2 ·
They do a good job. They are good., , some of these people deserve to have an Oscar or an Emmy or whatever because they're really, really good at appearing as if they're sincere. And, , they dress the part and they walk the part and they certainly talk the part, and they do get the accolades from whatever side of the spectrum that they want them from, nothing changes. And here we are wanting to see.
Speaker 2 ·
Justice. Freaking I wanna see justice. I wanna see a move towards justice. And in blue states, we don't even have most of our attorney generals or our prosecutors or our judges because these no account, low class senators have this agreement that they won't approve these positions based on who's in the office. So the red guys are gonna disapprove at the next election if we lose, which at this rate, we will., the reds are gonna lose, blues are gonna win, and we are gonna look at Biden and that administration and wish for the old days because there are gonna be some angry people.
Speaker 2 ·
In their positions coming after people like us, me, I don't know about everybody here, me who voted red the last election. So, yes, we are going to see payback, and we'll never see justice in this environment.
Speaker 2 ·
So I don't know what the answer is. I it's not a pleasant thought.
Speaker 1 ·
No. Very unpleasant. But I'll tell you this.
Speaker 1 ·
It's it's so much deeper than even yes. I agree. It's gonna be red versus blue payback in alternating cycles. It always has been. But I'll tell you, they're all so deeply invested in the coming system too that will never see justice because they're all they're all, like, hip deep in the crap. And so there's no way that they're going to allow any accountability because it'll they'll go down with it. So, ,.
Speaker 1 ·
You have to you still have to stay in the fight because what else are you gonna do? Lay down and give up? Absolutely not. But, I don't see any I don't see the mechanisms or the levers except for, like we were talking about last week, hammering the current administration hard about their legacy. But they don't even at that, they seem to be very bluntly not concerned about their base being extremely ticked off, and they're not worried about losing the midterms apparently. So you gotta wonder, if there's any leverage at all, because I think both sides see the coming system as a.
Speaker 1 ·
Great deal of power control being dumped into their hands, and I don't know that they're worried about either one of their bases., I hope that will change, but it's gonna be it's gonna be a real war. If you think we've had a war the last five years, you haven't seen anything yet.
Speaker 0 ·
I really I hate to say it, but it seems like they're.
Speaker 0 ·
Playing patty cake here. In the first Trump admin, he set the table with operation warp speed. And then the next administration, the opposition, quote, administration came in and mandated the product of our operation warp speed on everyone. And now we have Trump's admin the current administration setting up the control and track grid, and then the next administration can weaponize it against the people. Like, nobody claims full responsibility.
Speaker 1 ·
Everybody's just got their hands half in the pot this way. Yep. And that allows the grid the people above them to maintain their control at the national level. And it is. It's a game of patty cake, setting the table. I set the table. You run the you run the buffet. You run the system. I set the table. You run the system.
Speaker 0 ·
And they just pass it off between themselves, and then we continue to fight amongst ourselves as if it, as if we can vote our way out of this by banging harder against the opposition party when it's all these uniparty dynamics and no one is really working in the interest of protecting the people and humanity into the future.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. Which is why I really believe that the only the only real leverage we have is standing together at a local grassroots level because that's going to be the hardest level for them to penetrate with the grid that they wanna put in place. So we have to be prepared at that level and ready to withdraw ourselves from that system and be, , be resilient at our local levels because it's the only resistance that we can truly mount that will put a bit of a hurt on them.
Speaker 0 ·
It's interesting too. The CEO of Palantir, which is the company who is really shoring up the track and control grid,.
Speaker 0 ·
Espouses
Speaker 0 ·
Formerly liberal beliefs, but claims to have seen the error of his ways and, , they're they're building the control grid so the bad guys don't build a worse one, basically, is their logic.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, and by the way, can the parallel there? We're building the control grid so the bad guys don't build a worse one. Now here it comes. Here's the parallel. We're building getting a function viruses so that we'll be prepared for when the other guys, the really bad guys build one. It's the same story.
Speaker 0 ·
The exact We have to do the we have to do the gain of function research so we can be prepared when somebody else has weaponized a virus and unleashes it on us. Yeah. It's exactly It's so transparent when it.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. It's and the thing is, , that in and of itself is extremely brash and bold that they can go, oh, we'll just use the same narrative just on a much larger scale, and we can get away with that alone just absolutely infuriates me. But the sad part is a significant portion of humanity isn't paying attention, and they're right.
Speaker 2 ·
That's
Speaker 0 ·
That's the thing. It's the thing we've been fighting against for the last five years is that the legacy media, mainstream media, and the propaganda machines still retain the majority share of the attention spans of the people.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And, which, , that's why I really I've really started trying to work at my grassroots level because I feel like, at least there, I have a fighting chance of getting people's attention away from the propaganda machine and hopefully build something that will be, at least a thorn in the side down at a grassroots level. Because, again, it's that's gonna be the hardest place for them to penetrate.
Speaker 0 ·
And if nothing else, that local coordination may be the thing that enables you to survive what's coming.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. And if you think about it, there is a parallel there., you had the greatest empire nation on Earth coming over to this continent trying to beat a bunch of ragtag farmers, disorganized. And it was really hard for them because, , the rebels the American rebels, the at that time, , they were just an absolute ant compared to the British Empire. But yet, , the guerrilla warfare and the local resources were much of what allowed them to win eventually.
Speaker 1 ·
So, , we can look at this big, the tyrannical grid that's coming and look at it in the same way. Yeah. They seem to have all the power, but they also can't penetrate down to that local level, and we can be real thorns in their side in multiple organizations and across the country if we decide to do that.
Speaker 0 ·
And let's be honest, just continuing to survive.
Speaker 1 ·
Is being a thorn in their side in many cases. Oh, it absolutely is because their goal is to, , depopulate down to 500, 000, 000. So just staying alive is an act of resistance. So just preparing and getting those networks set up for yourself and your family and for your neighbors is a real act of resistance and a real thorn in their side.
Speaker 0 ·
And you notice everything that they're setting up is deterrence from that and atomizing and isolating individuals. They're they're doing studies. Loneliness has never been higher. People are lonelier than ever because of these dynamics that have been fostered. Nobody wants to admit that they're they're feeling alone too, but the consequence of being funneled onto online and monitored moderated platforms is that lack of real and real life human connection. And humans are over millions of years of evolution. We are.
Speaker 0 ·
Dependent on that for so many things. And the little plus ones, the little hearts, and, and feedback mechanisms that they've provided for us to get those warm fuzzies online simply aren't quite cutting it.
Speaker 1 ·
No. They're not. And I think, , that is the real solution is real human connection and not allowing them to weaponize us against each other anymore regardless of what happened in the last five years., real goal is because you can't you can't look at people like one of our former guests did and, say, well, , I'm unvaccinated or unvaccinated, and I'm superior to you or either or. You can't look at that anymore because we've all been affected by it, and we really do. If we really want to stand against the real enemy, and the real enemy is not your unvaccinated.
Speaker 1 ·
Or vaccinated acquaintance, friend, or family member. The real enemy are the people who did this to us, And we need to remember that above and beyond all. That's what we need to remember.
Speaker 0 ·
And on that note, we need to have compassion for those who were taken in by the really incredible weaponized military grade propaganda and censorship campaigns that led people down a rabbit hole into an unreality. And, , you have to feel for those people who are still living in that clown world facsimile of reality and taking it for granted that actually is reality, which is why every Saturday, we drive home the point, and we'll probably say it several times tonight.
Speaker 0 ·
The best thing you can do for your loved ones is get them to pull the plug on that toxic propaganda, walk away for however long you can manage to break that addiction. And once you are liberated from that, your entire perspective, your point of view, your ability to process different information will be altered. And at that point, you might be able to get through to those people in a way that maybe you haven't to this point.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. And, , sadly with the coming system, I think there's gonna be a real opportunity there when that shock sets in. When they see, oh, yet another thing has happened that, , the crazy anti vaxxers were talking about. Oh, maybe I ought to rethink my acceptance of what I think is reality. Now that there's another huge shoe that has dropped right in my face. And, , we can take advantage of that. We can say, look, hey,.
Speaker 1 ·
We saw it. We're we're not, , we're not gonna hold it against you, but are you ready to become part of the fight now? Or do you wanna continue to live in that world of constructed narratives because that's easier for you to stick your head in the sand., really, we've gotta directly still invite them in, but take advantage of the shock and hope that they can pull themselves out of that situation. I hope.
Speaker 0 ·
And speaking of the drip, drip, drip of reality that should be shocking these people into reevaluating what they've taken on board so far, This week, a new Stanford Medicine study, quote, shows why mRNA based COVID nineteen vaccines can cause myocarditis. A lot of people have taken this as, oh, look. Stanford's admitting that vaccines cause myocarditis. That's not what this is. Stanford acknowledges that the vaccines cause myocarditis. They're just saying we finally figured out why. And the why is, oh, these shots are attacking people's immune systems and weaponizing.
Speaker 0 ·
Them against their own bodies and now their heart is being attacked by their immune system. Oh, what do? But they don't even touch the what does that point to? That points to something we talk about in this space every Saturday night when the vax injured come on, where their immune the spectrums of autoimmune disorders that are being facilitated by these shots are the elephant in the room. And they're not even addressing that. They're acknowledging, yes, your immune system is attacking your heart, but they're not touching on the other wide spectrum.
Speaker 0 ·
Of things that this is doing to people's people's immune system that is then causing their immune system to do to their body.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly.
Speaker 3 ·
And Well, and the people that are I'm sorry, Mary. Oh, no. Go ahead. The people that continue to take them, this is where people better start driving the point home is it's changing. MRNA, , mRNA is changing them.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, , you've got a synthetic product going inside your cells, which is what Absolutely. That's what evokes the immune response because the body recognizes there's something in my cells that are not me. Meaning, it's not self. So then it attacks its own cells in order to try to eliminate the non self. And the thing is this is this is no surprise. It was, , the real experts were saying, this is going to happen. This is going to happen. We're going to have an autoimmune epidemic. And that combined with the fact that it's absolute idiocy. It's always been idiocy.
Speaker 1 ·
To say that because you inject something into a muscle, it's going to stay in a muscle. It's not going to stay in the muscle. Do why? Because muscles are red. Why muscles are red? Because they're rich in blood flow.
Speaker 1 ·
Hello? Anywhere you have lots of blood flow coming in, you have a lot of venous drainage going out, and it goes straight and travels around the body. That load of anything stays confined to a muscle is a is a bunch of BS.
Speaker 0 ·
They And not only that, their own studies demonstrated because they injected blood shots with luciferase, which makes it low so you can track it through the body. Yes. And they demonstrated that, it's actually it's going freaking everywhere and it's concentrating, guess where, in the reproductive organs.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. And here's the thing. Guys, everybody knows that your body has a has a has two pathways to detoxify the body, to get stuff out of the body that doesn't belong. Okay? Liver, kidneys. And guess what? What gets the stuff to those pathways to get it out? Your circulatory system. So anything that doesn't belong in your system is going to travel through your lymph system, to your circulatory system, and guess what that attaches to? That attaches and feeds every organ in your body. It is physically impossible to confine any foreign substance.
Speaker 1 ·
To one part of your body, muscle or anything else. It is not confined. That's why your immune system has an immune response. It goes wherever the problem is, which means nothing is siloed in the body. Even the blood brain barrier is not impenetrable. It is very much penetrable. Okay? And that's the scariest one, isn't it, Miriam? Yes. And the thing that will penetrate the blood brain barrier is a lipid. Okay? Because guess what the brain is encased in and neurological tissues are encased in. Fats, lipids. Okay?
Speaker 1 ·
So they knew exactly what they were doing when they did this. It's not a bit of a surprise. That's why people were who actually decided to think, thought about the physiology and were able to predict what was gonna happen. It's not because there's some godlike person. It's because they understood the physiology, and they also knew that it was a bunch of BS.
Speaker 3 ·
Miriam, I learned I learned this in microbiology a long a hundred years ago, but what? That's why is when this all started, I knew about I was all over the vaccine stuff, but not so much the protocol. I didn't hear anything about that. But because I learned this shit in microbiology.
Speaker 1 ·
Right. Microbiology and physiology has not changed. It has not changed. It is what it is. If it and you apply it, you're gonna look at the BS they're spouting. You're gonna go, hell no. That's not getting injected in me. Okay? But people who don't know the micro and the physiology were depending on some of the so called experts who weren't experts at all. They were pharma shields lying through their what in teeth, and they didn't care that they were gonna kill people.
Speaker 3 ·
They knew. That's where I made a lot of enemies right off the bat. I just want you to know. But they also, they knew I could argue my point.? They just don't wanna hear it.
Speaker 0 ·
But I think they did wanna kill people. I think they did care if it was harming people, and they were erring on the side of, yes. We need to eliminate people from the planet. Right. So it's a good thing that these, quote, useless eaters.
Speaker 1 ·
Take long. Yeah. I wasn't talking about the givers. I was talking about the receivers on that and what I was saying. Yeah. But you're right. It's even worse than them not caring that people are gonna die. You're right, Chelsea. It was a designed amplification trying to increase the kill ratio. Everything that they did was designed to increase the kill ratio.
Speaker 0 ·
And I'm not saying that the pharmacist pushing these shots in the arms or all of the medical professionals or all of medicine was in on this, but there was there I think it's incontrovertible that at the highest levels, they knew exactly what they were doing. And at the lowest levels, they should have figured it out by now to the point that anyone who's putting this in anybody's arm at this point should feel bad.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. I'm here to say and argue the point to the rest of my until I'm not breathing anymore. Pharmacists have no right to give a shot. They're not that's not their training.
Speaker 3 ·
I'm sorry, but they know their medicine, but they're not trained in those kinds of things. How this all, was allowed is just BS.
Speaker 1 ·
Agreed. And the thing is, though what? You don't have to you don't have to have any advanced understanding of physiology. If you look around you and you just talk to, , a few people and you ask them how many people do that have died suspiciously? And you don't have to be a brain surgeon to figure out that, hey. We need to stay away from those things because just looking at the casualties and the rate of casualties in the eighteen to forty nine year old groups, what's going on. You absolutely know. So I agree with, , Chelsea that.
Speaker 1 ·
The people at the top knew and the people at the bottom now absolutely know. And anybody from this standpoint that continues to push an injection no matter who they are, they are guilty.
Speaker 2 ·
I really I agree with both of you or all of you, because, , like the like the protocols, , early on, they were using in some of the hospitals because I believe it was Nicole Sirotech, and it may have also been echoed by Erin nurse Erin. They came from out of state and went to New York, and they were horrified because they were they were giving hydroxychloroquine to patients, and they were supporting them and helping them through the virus. And not all, but the majority were going home. And then they go to New York, and they're, , putting people who aren't.
Speaker 2 ·
COVID positive on the same floors with the COVID positive. They're ignoring the COVID positive. They're not tending to the COVID positive. And this was before the true protocols were really organized. So that made it go way downhill very fast, and that's why both of those women were so adamant. They're killing our patients. This is not what the hell is going on? And the I guess it was.
Speaker 2 ·
I don't know what these nurses and doctors were thinking that Nicole and Erin were dealing with.
Speaker 2 ·
Were they were they just that unethical, heartless? I don't know what the answers are as far as why did they was it possible that the hospitals that these two ladies were in were deadly before the protocol before the pandemic? And then you had a bunch of Strong.
Speaker 3 ·
Possibility. But part of what you're saying, Sherry, and this is where I think and this is where the only time I'll give this nursing, doctors, anybody have passed, is in the beginning, I think.
Speaker 3 ·
Hospital when you think something is made, it could be legit where people were afraid, but not very short timing do you go is that allowed? What I'm saying? Before, .
Speaker 2 ·
And that's where I was gonna go next was the.
Speaker 2 ·
The neglect part of it. Was that,.
Speaker 2 ·
A response to fear because they were afraid of catching the virus, so they just stayed out of the rooms and did the very least possible.
Speaker 3 ·
Well, can I bring up a question with what you're saying? Or not a question, but, like well, I don't know what it is. You guys would know, but so are my pay grade here. Anyway,.
Speaker 3 ·
, we never talk about the ratings of some of these, the hospital ratings of because they are rated. And so sometimes when we see the really bad neglect, they were already pissed for hospitals. What? We always talk about it just happening right now, but never have I heard us ever in a conversation ever talk about what were the ratings of the particular hospital. What? Well, I know that.
Speaker 2 ·
Erin I think it was Erin. Mhmm. Because she called so her book is epicenter nurse. Well, that particular hospital had a tendency to have a lot of patients who were low income and or racially diverse, to be polite. And I have a feeling that's where you're going to find just what you were talking about is the inability to care for the patient that they had before the pandemic or the neglect of the patients was already on a higher end before the pandemic. And I think you're right. I think that we're? And then that we know that in New York, it became standard care to.
Speaker 2 ·
Ventilate the patients early to prevent spread of the disease.
Speaker 3 ·
Why I think they picked New York too, Sherry? It's because everybody watches New York.
Speaker 2 ·
Oh, it's easily yeah. It's easily at the same time, interestingly enough, when you go back and you look at the spread of the disease, the military members who were likely the vectors, the ones who brought it here in late twenty nineteen from Wuhan because they were in the military games in Wuhan, and I still maintain, I think, that they were purposely infected somehow. Don't care how. Just saying. This was the perfect way for this to be kinda seated all over the globe as these military guys and gals went back home.
Speaker 2 ·
The our guys and gals came back into Washington state. Remember, our first known case in the states happened out of Washington state. How did we get to New York and not spread more in Washington?
Speaker 2 ·
That it there are a lot of questions about those spread issues that don't make sense. Now all of us have always talked about had the worst cold in 2019 or early twenty before we even knew that this thing was spreading. So is it possible because it was spreading in late twenty nineteen that it was actually coming across the country, and nobody knew it because, damn it, it's wintertime.
Speaker 3 ·
It's December. Getting a very, early variant, which was probably a lighter. Because what mean? It because it mutates.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. And, well, it should mutate lower.
Speaker 3 ·
Although I gotta tell you, I had it, and it wasn't a late case in there. No. And,.
Speaker 2 ·
Steven was pretty sure that he picked it up in Maryland when he went hunting at the November in Southern Maryland. Opening day of, deer season is a Saturday after Thanksgiving, and he went up to go hunting. And when he came back, like, a week and a half later or a week later, he slept for almost three weeks in his recliner because he his lungs, , he just wasn't able to breathe well. And we just assumed it was a really bad cold, And, I didn't get sick. But then in early twenty, the January, I went to Maryland because my best friend's birthday, but it was a big surprise.
Speaker 2 ·
And I came home after, like, two days up there. I never heard about anybody who was at that party that got sick. Never got any information that my two boys both went up there because my best friend watched them grow up, And nobody talked about being sick. And I'm coming home and I'm like, all the food that I carried with me so that I can eat because I drive and eat to keep awake, it all tasted terrible. It was like it tasted like somebody had poured chemicals on it. And then I got home, and I thought I got walking pneumonia.
Speaker 2 ·
I, , I was home a couple days, and then I'm, like, getting these pains in my ribs when I when I'm breathing. And I was ready to Steve was getting ready to go away again. He was always traveling. And I thought as soon as he's gone, I'm gonna go have, , have the doctor do a chest X-ray, see if I've got pneumonia coming on. I don't want him to know that I'm feeling bad because then he'll worry about me. It just went away.
Speaker 2 ·
But then that was the way Delta acted with me also. I didn't know to look for it, and Delta took him out, obviously.
Speaker 2 ·
But I think that could have been happening across the country in that time span from maybe as late maybe as early as October, all the way across The United States. It could have been moving through. And remember, we have we heard a lot of stories about this strange new flu or strange new pneumonia, and nobody knew what to do about it. I personally.
Speaker 0 ·
Got that in May 2019. Just looking at some of my old tweets right now. And it took until August 2019.
Speaker 0 ·
I've pinned the tweet to the nest. 08/05/2019, my voice finally recovered. So it started in May and I literally I was so sick for so long. I couldn't speak for I don't know how long. It was weeks or months.
Speaker 2 ·
I really wanna ask you questions now because you just reminded me of something else that happened in '20 I believe in 2019.
Speaker 2 ·
There was a recall of vaping products that they said were making people sick, but I don't know whether that would have affected you because I don't know whether you were vaping at that time.
Speaker 2 ·
Was that a potential, I don't know if you remember it. Does any else does anybody else remember that? Juul. It was called Juul.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. I remember it. Yeah. I remember the recall.
Speaker 2 ·
I wonder if it was related, or was it a test or a not very good test so they had to come up with another way to spread it.
Speaker 2 ·
, when we look at everything else that this government and governments around the world have ever done, , all the things that we've ever known. Oh, Lyme's disease comes from Lyme's Connecticut because of the, , Plum Island facility. And, , we hear, oh, that's bullshit. And then, , what was it? Marty McCary says the other day, yeah. Well, that's what happened. Well, duh.?
Speaker 2 ·
Wait a minute. We've known this forever. They've been doing it to us forever, and they do it to the low income,.
Speaker 2 ·
Third world country children all the time. Why?
Speaker 2 ·
There's a part of me that wants to march on Washington. But if I talk about that in a space, then I'm gonna be, they're gonna be knocking on my door by morning. So.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And the sad thing is, , the whole reason that they've done this repetitively is because they're trying to perfect the way to get the kill rate they want. That's why that's why they never stop. And, , the good news is we're exponentially harder to kill than they all than they ever thought.? And we need to keep that in mind too so we don't live in fear. It is much harder to kill a healthy person, than they ever dreamed.
Speaker 3 ·
So I Yes. Because god really did give us everything.
Speaker 1 ·
We needed. And despite our best efforts of complying with them, they still can't get the kill rate they want. So, , we need to have some confidence in ourselves and make sure that we invest some time in taking care of ourselves and others because we're much harder to kill than they ever dreamed. We need to remember that so that we don't live in fear from all of their scheming and all of the nefarious things that they do. That's why they have to work so hard because we're we're not lightweights.
Speaker 0 ·
And our mental health and that of those we are close to and the people that we love is as imperative as physical health. And that is being weaponized as the next prong of attack right now It is. With voluntary euthanasia campaigns already in action in Canada. Oh, they just love all the organs they get. And now The UK is trying to get the same thing through despite the will of the people. Yes.
Speaker 1 ·
And there's a lady in Canada, that Glenn Beck was, trying to get to The US to save her life. She has something called parathyroid hormone dysfunction and was in just massive pain for the last eight years because it causes problems with calcium levels in the blood and bone. And if you've ever if you've never had bone pain, severe bone pain, you, you really if you imagine that all over your whole body for eight years, you would wanna die. But think about this. Now they've decided because they're withholding the care that she needs, the removal of those the of the parathyroid glands.
Speaker 1 ·
Now they've decided that, , well, we'll just offer her a maid. We won't give her the simple surgery she needs to solve this when she's been suffering for eight years. So this shows you clearly two things. Yes. Just across a clear line. Yeah. It shows you clearly what their goal is, but it also shows you something else clearly. The woman suffered for eight years and still is here and still wants to live. Okay? So here's the thing. You have to realize we all have that power. Suffering is a horrible thing,.
Speaker 1 ·
But we always wanna choose life over death when it comes to suffering because they think that they can manipulate us emotionally, make us want to die to cooperate with them. And we need to risk resist that at all costs. At all costs.
Speaker 2 ·
I don't know. I had to go let the dogs out, and I came back and you guys were talking about the lady in Canada. Jolene is her name. She has a name. And according to Glenn Beck and her and her husband, I heard the interview between him and the husband,.
Speaker 2 ·
I get the feeling that something may have gone wrong in a previous surgery that wasn't corrected properly, because he said something to the effect of after one of her previous surgeries, the doctor said that didn't go as well as I thought it would, and I'm hoping we won't have to go back. Anyway, the surgery she needs, it turns out, was.
Speaker 2 ·
That it looks like it's gonna be done in Tampa at a hospital that is specifically devoted to parathyroid surgeries. And the doctor himself.
Speaker 2 ·
Is the pioneer of the surgery she needs. Apparently, it's very specialized, and not every surgeon will do it. So there is some complexity to it.
Speaker 2 ·
I'd love to know more about her case. I have not gone digging for it just out of curiosity because I remember knowing just a little bit about this stuff when my husband had his thyroid taken out.
Speaker 2 ·
So but I'm sorry. I'm I am glad that this is working out for her. I don't want anybody please don't take this wrong. But there are a lot of people in Canada that need this help because that government is a useless pile of steaming dog manure.
Speaker 2 ·
And we can all sit here and say that in our own dagon country.
Speaker 1 ·
Just my thoughts. Oh, no. You're 100% right. And the problem with the parathyroid gland removal is they are super small, and you can literally they can literally miss because they are tiny, and they can cause other complications or not remove the actual full parathyroid gland because it's so tiny. They can miss a section of it. And even though they didn't specify that, that's the common problem. If you've had a previous surgery for that, they won't get it fully removed because they are so tiny.
Speaker 1 ·
And then you still have the problem. They have to go back in later and go again. So I suspect that's what happened with her. And it's really sad because it is a miserable thing when that is going on. Because like I said, you have severe bone pain, muscle cramps, tingling. It's it's, if you've ever had a really bad flu where your body just aches all over, multiply that by about a 100 times, and it never goes away.
Speaker 2 ·
Mhmm. Yeah. That makes sense. That makes sense because whenever Steven talked to his doctor about? Because of the way synthetic sin, thyroid medications are delivered, they're all oral. They're all by capsules or pills. I believe I know his were pills. And.
Speaker 2 ·
If you've got a really good doctor, they are able to help you get your levels right. And he did. He had a good doctor, got those levels right. They took one of his parathyroids. I think it was damaged in the surgery. And so they took one. And but when he was talking to his doctor, he was trying to figure out when this government because we were talking about this, , twenty years ago. When this government locks down everything and I can't get my medication anymore, Is there a natural anything I can use? And both of his doctors told him no, and this is what will happen in.
Speaker 2 ·
Your description of the flu is exactly what he told him. It's gonna feel like a really bad case of the flu, and you will never recover it, and you will die pretty quickly. I think it's like a six week six week turnaround or maybe eight on the outside depending on how healthy you are. If you don't have thyroid medicate the, a supplement and you have no thyroid. But because of what the thyroid does for your body in itself, the parathyroid, I believe, is a supportive organ to the thyroid. Many times in the history of the world, if people had a problem with their thyroid,.
Speaker 2 ·
Particularly, it seems like particularly for women, it would make them hallucinate. It would make them more emotional than a menopausal woman or perimenopausal woman. People were institutionalized for being nut cases because of thyroid issues.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, yeah., the big thing with parathyroid effect is your calcium levels. Oh, yeah. And if you if you get hyper or hypocalcemia, in your blood, it causes massive problems throughout your entire system because that's part of your endocrine system. So it's gonna mess with your hormones. It's gonna mess with everything. And the thing is there's four of those little pea sized things. They're parathyroid glands directly behind the thyroid. So anytime anybody has a thyroid surgery, they can cause a problem with the parathyroids.
Speaker 1 ·
Mhmm. And there's there's four of them back there, and they're literally pea sized or smaller. They're tiny. Yep. One of very easy for them to screw that surgery up extremely.
Speaker 2 ·
In his case, yeah, one of them was damaged, and she had to take one of them. And to your point, it happens fast because he she said, if your cal if your other three don't pick up the slack because of the one I had to take, then you're going to have a calcium problem, and you're gonna have to address it immediately. And his question then obviously was, okay. How will I know what's happening and what do I do? And she said, your lips will start tingling.
Speaker 2 ·
Mhmm. And then if you need to grab the first glass of milk, you can. And I had, , made sure I had a whole milk on hand just in case, and it did happen. And, and just that quick, a glass of milk took the tingle away. And, fortunately, he was a milk drinker, so that helped. But it's the body is an amazing thing if what to put in for. It is so super sensitive. And just for the audience, by the way,.
Speaker 1 ·
Magnesium and, and calcium are inversely proportional in the bloodstream. So if your calcium levels get dysregulated and they go really high or really low, the opposite thing happens to your magnesium. And that's seriously a problem because magnesium causes your muscles to relax and your blood vessels to relax. So if you get, , way too high on the calcium, you're gonna have low magnesium.
Speaker 1 ·
You talking about muscular pain cramps, high blood pressure, and then, , because the blood vessels contract. And then what happens is you end up having a stroke or cutting off blood flow to major organs like kidneys. This is why the calcium and magnesium levels are so important, and that's why any disruption to your parathyroid glands is life threatening.
Speaker 2 ·
Yep. Well, supposedly, she's gonna be coming here. And, apparently, Beck was able to get our government on board because it could take days for them to get a neither one of them have pass ports. Obviously, he has to travel with her. It's not like she can come alone. And, apparently, Beck got the passport issue waived the way it sounded on Friday. I don't know who called him, but somebody called him from the administration during his radio show. And he said that he that was one of the questions. They need passports. They don't have passports. And the response was, we'll.
Speaker 2 ·
We'll take care of it or that'll be handled or something to that effect.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. See, and this is the next thing that this pulls out of me is when this action on one case Yep. Because it comes to a high profile person's attention. Yep. If we can do this with one person, why are we not doing this with the vax injured? Why are not these high profile people going to bat for them like they did like he has done for Jolene? Why are they not going to bat for people who are suffering like young widows,.
Speaker 1 ·
And you guys know who I'm talking about whose 37 year old marine husband was killed? Yep. Why are they not going to bat for them and for the rest of us? Here's why. Because this lady, it has no ties to the COVID vaccine, operation warp speed, or anything. We're kryptonite Yeah. Is what we are.
Speaker 2 ·
Now we don't know, though, if she's had the COVID vaccine because, , we No. But it but it's not publicly tied to her. Yeah. No. There's no public She's not.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. She's not deaf to Glenn Beck's program.
Speaker 2 ·
Because she's not publicly tied to it. Yeah. And he's We are. Yeah. And he's using it to highlight MAID because he's so insulted by them having MAID. When we have four or five states that have assisted suicide Mhmm. It's just a difference in the name of the program and whether or not people get to use it for a specific purpose. It's not that far out of the realm of possibility that it's going to be offered in those states for these reasons.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, in May, it's already being offered to vaccinated people right and left. Exactly. That's right. The same issue. If you're gonna save a life because of a parathyroid gland problem, why can't you save a life that MAID is being offered to a vaccine injured person? It's? But why? Because of the implications to their shows and their careers, they do not want to be associated with raising the profile of a person Right. That is attached to the vaccine or the hospital protocol issues.
Speaker 0 ·
Go ahead, Chelsea. I don't wanna ignore I was just gonna say even when there is not an official program, and you guys know this all too well, even when it's not legal to do euthanasia in your state, It's an unspoken secret among health care professionals, especially in assisted living and hospice care. And with the incentive the incentives of organ procurement,.
Speaker 0 ·
You can just see where this goes from here. Yep.
Speaker 2 ·
Exactly.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. I know for a fact, have a family friend who the hospice worker said, hey., he's he was dying from esophageal cancer and told the wife, , if he's really in pain, you can give him as much as he wants. Wink. Wink.
Speaker 2 ·
Yep.
Speaker 1 ·
And so she just left the fentanyl patches on him, didn't pull them off as directed, kept giving him the morphine whenever he wanted it, and he just silently slipped away.
Speaker 3 ·
And I wanna jump in here on this one. This is where the difference lies. Because back in the day, I'm sorry, we, I understand what you're saying because they're they're leaving bottles of a hundred milligrams of.
Speaker 3 ·
Morphine in a in a household with somebody that is not trained to use it. There's where the line something changed there too because we did not do that back in the day. It just you didn't? Did I train them to give medications? Yes. But I didn't leave that medication in the house. And if they had to be on something that high, they were going into a center or something where they could be monitored by a nurse. So I don't know where that line changed because it just every time I hear it, it makes it upsets me because I loved my profession. I loved what I did,.
Speaker 3 ·
And it just makes me sick.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. It would make anybody with a conscience and ethics sick. The problem is that conscience and ethics are a endangered species now, and the line has been crossed so far now that nobody thinks twice about it. Really sad.
Speaker 0 ·
What's worse is that they've redefined along with so many other things, redefined ethics. And we know that Fauci's wife was responsible for a lot of this, moving the goalposts where the ethical framework actually makes the case for why it's good and moral to perform experiments on orphan children, for example. Well,.
Speaker 1 ·
The whole mental attitude of a significant portion of humanity now is, oh, it's humane to, , relieve their suffering or not even allow them to come into being to suffer at all. And how dare you decide for someone else whether or not they get a life or how long they live? How dare you? That's not your choice to make.
Speaker 0 ·
They would like for it to be.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, yeah., they I firmly believe they get a perverse thrill kill out of it because they're sick.
Speaker 0 ·
And why beagles? Why Snoopy? Why do they and they just did this to what? Was it another 500 beagles they're going to be experimenting on under this administration? Did you guys see that?
Speaker 1 ·
I did, and it made me literally sick.
Speaker 0 ·
Like, I guess rats just aren't aren't good enough.
Speaker 1 ·
I guess not. It's a sad indicator of where we are. That's why it's so important for us to stand up because if not now, when?
Speaker 0 ·
In the nest, there is now a link to Fauci's wife's curriculum on the ethics of human experimentation, including explicit recognition of the benefit from research for quote therapeutic orphans like children. Just check that out.
Speaker 2 ·
Oh jeez.
Speaker 1 ·
It is
Speaker 1 ·
I don't even have a word for it. It's beyond any words.
Speaker 0 ·
So when the ethics allow for things like that, it's it's not hard to see how they do their think tanks and their focus groups. And they say, oh, the best thing we could do is make everyone allergic to meat or shrink children down to the size of Barbie dolls or give everyone a novel virus to reduce the population and then experiment on them with gain of function mRNA vaccines.
Speaker 1 ·
It's moments like this that, I actually have to remind myself that it's a good thing that I don't have the power to make choices for those people who are promoting these agendas because the choice that I would make for them would not be a pleasant one.
Speaker 0 ·
, they're honestly, they're setting up the frameworks that would, if implemented fairly, would reward them in kind for their deeds.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. And, , I love how you said if implemented fairly. Exactly right. That's the issue. They feel that, , they are not part of that, that they are gods and above all that. And that's something for the rest of humanity who actually have a soul and a conscience. We cannot relate to that psyche, that soulless pathologic mentality. It's unreal.
Speaker 0 ·
And speaking of, I'm sure you guys saw it, but this week, Bill Gates was interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, see the nest. They asked him about how he feels to be the villain, cast as a villain by quote, right wing extremists. And, and his response is, well, , Robert Kennedy junior wrote a book about how I've killed millions of children with vaccines. That's half true. I've spent millions of dollars to save millions of lives with vaccines. And he also he says, the people should be the judge. Let the let the people be the judge. And I.
Speaker 0 ·
I can't imagine too many people would really believe that he's this great philanthropist who has dedicated his life to actually helping humanity when you look at the fruit of what he's done so far?
Speaker 3 ·
No. I vote let the people decide.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I was gonna say that, Deb. I wish that someone would take him literally. Someone in power and authority would say, let the people decide. Because I promise you, the people who have suffered under the things that he has done, he does not want them to decide. I don't think so. With.
Speaker 0 ·
That, I'd like to welcome Lori. Lori's been impacted by the gain of function vaccines in the form of shedding, and it's been devastating. How are you doing tonight, Lori?
Speaker 5 ·
I'm hanging in there. Thanks for, , hosting a space every Saturday and everything you guys do. Yeah.,.
Speaker 5 ·
The exposure is a 100% real, and I really didn't believe in it that much until it happened to me. And but,.
Speaker 5 ·
Yeah, I've been trying to do research because it's been almost four and a half years since I've been suffering. And, of course,.
Speaker 5 ·
It's it's like almost like an injury, but I think I have I come to occlusion. Like, I have chronic neurovascular inflammation, microvascular dysfunction, and this stuff that the lipid nanoparticles that cross my blood brain barrier through, through breathing and all their chromosomes in my car with the windows almost all the way up. It also messed up my ethanol cell's linings. So I have to try to repair all my brain from all this. It's like a brain injury. And you were speaking about, like, the autoimmune issues. Yeah. Well, my ANA was high for almost a whole year.
Speaker 5 ·
Before it went back to being normal. And when I asked the.
Speaker 5 ·
The AI about that, it said because I had that, the foreign protein in my body,.
Speaker 5 ·
And it took that long, unfortunately, for my immune system.
Speaker 5 ·
To get to get rid of it. And then my body was inflamed, and it was attacking itself, and that's why the autoimmune issues is what it is. So even though it took about almost a year for my body to clear it all up, it did damage to my to my brain. So I pretty much have a brain injury from Pfizer shedding. And I see my neurologist at the end of this month in about a couple weeks. So I have more blood work that I wanna get done. I did speak on here on a on a space to a vascular neurologist, And I asked him, , from the exposure from the lipid nanoparticles and the spike proteins,.
Speaker 5 ·
Is there any other testing that I should, , recommend my neurologist to give me? So I'm gonna ask for those particular blood work and I don't know. I'm thinking about the one scan. So I've been trying to heal myself. Unfortunately,.
Speaker 5 ·
The medical system, , they don't acknowledge shedding the exposure. Of course, they're hiding that. So if I have to be referred it's already in my chart anyway, But if I have to be referred to a vascular neurologist, if the test probably do come back positive, then I'll just say, , I had exposure from people in the car with the lipid nanoparticles and the spike proteins, which is very toxic., you learn really quickly about all kinds of stuff. Like, who would ever thought, like, , Christmas is coming up in a couple weeks. And it's like, , Jesus.
Speaker 5 ·
Had three gifts, myrrh, gold, and frankincense. And who would ever thought that, , frank frankincense, which is Boswella tree, would be beneficial to inflammatory. And myrrh also is good. So I guess, , Jesus got those gifts for a reason, and they're still here for us to use. So, , check it check everything.?
Speaker 5 ·
It's a it's a blessing that Jesus got those gifts, and I think they're there for a reason for us to use. I have been using the basuala, , frankincense. And it does help a little bit, but I have my brain is so inflamed and for over four and a half years, it's just it's pretty much like a brain injury from the shedding. So it's just the shedding is a lot more dangerous than people think it is. And I think I don't know how many more are like me. I.
Speaker 5 ·
Go into these long COVID spaces once in a while, and I don't wanna offend the vaccinated people. I don't wanna offend anybody by any means. And I don't hold any vaccinated responsible for this. I hold our government, , and I hold our government to the highest, , responsibility for everything and not and not the vaccinated people because I stand with them to get justice just as well as me. But I, , I don't like to offend anybody about my story, . And.
Speaker 5 ·
What I'm saying is that, , I asked them, , the long COVID people in the spaces, and I asked them. I said, , did you take the shots? And they said, yeah. And I also got COVID. And I and I said I said, well, it's probably a combination of both. Because even though you took the shots, you were injected with the lipid nanoparticles, the spike proteins, and the mRNA. But then when you got to COVID, which is more or less shedding because even though you're vaccinated, you can still get the shedding. And why is that? And why does people still ask me that?
Speaker 5 ·
Why? Because there's different shots and there's different batch numbers. So, like, my brother that took three shots of Moderna. Right? Now I told him he has to be careful about going in cars because that's, , that's the biggest worst thing for shedding. And, of course, he just laughed it off. He's like, oh, I'm vaccinated., I got three shots. I'll be fine. So he went in the car with his friend that took, , two shots of the Pfizer. So here it is. Now his now he was vaccine injured already with Moderna with three shots. He his ankle burns.
Speaker 5 ·
So it's like burning neuropathy. And now and now his symptoms are worse because even though he had three shots of Moderna, he went into a car with somebody that took that took two shots of Pfizer, and now his symptoms are worse. So just because you're vaccinated doesn't mean that you can get different, , different stuff from Pfizer. And as you as you seen, they did that study, right, where the pregnant women that were unvaccinated had the mRNA in there from Pfizer. So question this, if you took the shots from Moderna,.
Speaker 5 ·
If you're around the people that took the shots from Pfizer, you could still get you could still get stuff from Pfizer. So it doesn't only just pertain to the unvaccinated. It the vaccinated people, , they get the shedding just as much as the unvaccinated people, and people and people don't realize that., what's your take on that? And I believe that the Delta information, like the Delta and the variants and all that, What I really do believe in it, I believe that it was transmission.
Speaker 5 ·
I believe that they knew this stuff was gonna shed and spread. And as of 2019 when you guys were getting deathly sick yeah. Me and my husband got deathly sick. And the reason why we did, and this is my and this is my prediction, is the reason why is because it happened after the flu shots were given out. And in 2019, I heard was the first year that they used mRNA. So I believe that the flu shots shedded to a whole another level, and that's why a lot more people got sick in 2019.
Speaker 0 ·
Well, Lori, I think when you say you don't wanna offend people, you don't wanna make the compliant, those who got backs, feel bad for shedding on you. Is that the basic gist of what you're implying with that?
Speaker 5 ·
Yeah. And like I said, I live a normal life. I go out. I don't wear a mask.? I go close to people all the time.? I just won't get in the car with anyone else except for my husband because of what I've been through. Now when I when I do go out in crowded places, me and my husband, unfortunately, , my husband like, was veterans. My husband's a vet. He was in the navy. And.
Speaker 5 ·
We went out for Veterans Day. We went to Dave and Buster's because, , they give out, , free food and free games, and we haven't been at Dave and Buster's in a in a long time. So when we went, it was wall to wall people because it was Veterans Day, , and everyone was there. And my husband it was really crazy packed in there. And.
Speaker 5 ·
It's kinda weird because I'm I'm sitting there. We're eating our dinner, and I'm getting lightheaded. I'm getting nauseous.
Speaker 5 ·
And queasy, and my husband's not feeling well. And I said, okay. Well, we'll just get the waitress over here. We'll get our food to go, and we'll go into the game room. And maybe it'll be better ventilation out there, less people. We can, , move around. We don't have to be in a crowded dining area. So then we went out there, , we put our food to the side, off to the table, and we were starting to play some of the games and stuff at Dave and Buster's. And my husband,.
Speaker 5 ·
He was saying, oh my god. I don't feel good at all. I'm really dizzy. I was starting to feel better once I get out to the game room. And he was so dizzy, he actually bumped into the wall and gashed his head open. And we had to leave and he we had to sit in the car. Thank god I had all these tissues in the glove box, but it took fifteen minutes from his head stop bleeding. And I'm like, are you kidding me? I'm like, just for one night, I figured, , we'll go out. And it was just it was just so much exposure, so many chromosomes or whatever.
Speaker 5 ·
In the air, and that's what happened. And it took my husband, like, a couple days, I say, like, three days just to get back to his normal self. And first thing I did when we got when we got home, I bumped up the vitamin c. I'm like, get the vitamin c out. I want you taking the vitamin c, the zinc, , because that's good. The vitamin c and the zinc, , and I made them take a Corsequin because they were those were the best things to take that I know of since I've been trying to heal myself and what I've been through. So my husband is actually.
Speaker 5 ·
Just as much as sensitive to shedding as I as I am. And that's the scary part because, see, it's Christmas time. Right? So I wanna go shopping. I wanna get stuff that we need and everything. So, like, last night, it was, like, 10: 00 at night. Now we have Wegmans, and they're open to midnight. So I said to my husband, I said, well, , it's Christmas time, so all the places are gonna be packed. Right? And I said, well, we'll go at 10: 00 at night, and maybe there'll be less people. Well, guess what? There wasn't.
Speaker 5 ·
There wasn't. There was this lot of people in there at 10: 00 at night, and I couldn't and I did I wanted to get my stuff, and I'm like, oh my god.? I'm like, here we go. So what's gonna happen now? So my husband came home. He had diarrhea all night. He was dizzy. He said, I'm so dizzy. I have to lay down. So it's like, and, , I could never even imagine that my husband would be more sensitive than shedding than me. Now I had to come home and take a shower right away.
Speaker 5 ·
Because I want I it felt like there was something on me that I wanted to get off because I was around all these people last night at 10: 00 shopping.? So this is like a sci fi horror movie that I have been living with. And my husband had to go to work today. He had to go to work today, and he was still feeling a little dizzy. So I am kinda worried about him.
Speaker 5 ·
I hope he's alright., I'm sure he would call me if he wasn't. But this is a sci fi horror movie that I'm that I'm living with. And, , it's for almost, what, four and a half years after the fact? And, , COVID's gone. COVID's gone. But, unfortunately, these people,.
Speaker 5 ·
And I hate to say it, but they're still shedding off something for me and my husband to have these lightheadedness, dizziness, queasiness, like we're gonna faint or pass out. And I couldn't believe that my husband was so dizzy at Dave and Buster's that he gashed his head open. So this is this is our reality now. I don't know if anyone else here if you have if you have problems, if you're around really a lot a lot of people, if you have any issues, , please come up and tell your story. But.
Speaker 5 ·
This is very alarming. I never thought that I would ever experience anything like this in America.
Speaker 0 ·
And it's something they've yet to address. Pfizer's own documents discuss exposure via inhalation or skin contact or breastfeeding, And these continue to be disinformationized and propagandized to the degree people are embarrassed to talk about it out loud because it's one of those crazy conspiracy theories. But you are not alone in this. I've heard from numerous people that, for example, one woman brought her children to visit with the vaccinated grandparents. The children come home broken out in hives. They have a rash now and it doesn't go away for days. Or.
Speaker 0 ·
For another example, a woman with her coworkers are all vaccinated. She continues to go into work. She's exposed. Now her cycles are all wonky. She is bleeding for weeks at a time and then not for months at a time or this thing. And I've heard this from numerous people over the years and it is absolutely a thing. And you still can't can't talk about it. The experts quote experts won't talk about it. And the few who do talk about it, downplay it. And, , it's not even a subjective conversation when it should be, especially when prion disease is still looming. And,.
Speaker 1 ·
That's another subject for another time, though. Miriam? -huh. Yeah. I just wanna say for any skeptics, out there, your skin is your biggest organ, and you noticed that Chelsea mentioned that Pfizer's own documents talk about, skin contact being a mode of transmission. It absolutely is. Your body will expel any of synthetic artificial toxin non self. It can and will expel it Multiple means, but one of the biggest means is skin. And that's why if anybody has ever thought about going to a sauna and heating up their body and sweating out toxins, hello. That's called exosomes.
Speaker 1 ·
Your body does release them. That's how it gets rid of the non self things. So anybody who says that shedding isn't real is either completely ignorant or choosing to tell the lie because your body does that largest organ helps detoxify the body. And yes, comes out in sweat, comes out in exhalation. That's why, , anybody who says, oh, I don't like to be around people who cough or sneeze. What do you think you're being worried about? Okay? That's your body's expelling from the mucous membranes any organisms that don't belong. That's why you cough or sneeze. So shedding is real.
Speaker 1 ·
And if you don't believe it, you need to inform yourself.
Speaker 0 ·
And remember the narrative. What really drives this home for me in context of crimes against humanity is the narrative at the time was you need to go get these shots to protect your loved ones. If you're not up to date with your latest COVID booster, you are a vector of disease and you are endangering everyone around you. When in fact, the opposite was true. Those who were going to get injected were bringing home this experimental mRNA that was shedding all over everyone. And then everyone gets sick and they say, oh, well, thank goodness I was vaxxed and boosted. Like, it's.
Speaker 0 ·
It's just so horrific. Like Laurie was saying, it's it's like waking into a horror movie when you look back at the entire scope of it. It's it's so it's.
Speaker 1 ·
So horrific that if it wasn't that horrific, it be ironic to the point of laughable that they're telling people, do this to protect your family, when in fact, it provides no protection at all. It provides a vector for transmission.
Speaker 0 ·
It's very sad. And in fact, efficacy.
Speaker 1 ·
Negative efficacy because it is transmitting. It absolutely is.
Speaker 0 ·
And even as Stanford acknowledges how these products are causing heart problems, they're not touching any of this. And it's that's how it's gonna be. It's gonna be, oh, new studies show drip, drip, drip until finally the full horror of what they've done to everyone becomes apparent. And by then, surely, everyone will be clamoring for accountability.
Speaker 3 ·
But that show that I posted this afternoon that they did on redacted, that was the,.
Speaker 3 ·
What do call it? The funeral home dudes. I can't think.
Speaker 3 ·
Morticians or the
Speaker 3 ·
When they were saying that they're doing a study on these clots because they're still seeing them and, like, some of them are, like, so far out, , that like, what, some of the vax injured say, , they're way far out, they're still producing this severe spike protein. So the study has something to do with that, but they,.
Speaker 3 ·
Because they're still trying to tell them guys that they're not seeing what they're seeing either.?
Speaker 1 ·
But it's a pretty it's a pretty interesting show. Yeah. They don't want people to even believe their own eyes, including the embalmers. They don't want them to believe their own eyes. They don't want them to share it. But, , there's no mystery here. When you create inflammation in the body from the spike protein, that causes fibrin to start to be produced. And there's long been a test, Deb, as, for fibrin and fibrinogen. There's a blood test for that. And anytime you have a foreign item in the body, a foreign protein, the body is going to try.
Speaker 1 ·
It's gonna increase its inflammation levels, increase the fiber levels, and try to wall that off. Okay? And if you got the spike protein hearing to the inside of the blood vessel lining, and it's been proven that it does. It does damage to the inside of the blood vessel lining, then the body's going to start adding fibrin, and the fibrinogen levels are gonna go up in the blood. And that fibrin creates the fibrous. Hear that? The fibrous clots. The white fibrous clots. And they basically.
Speaker 1 ·
Build up to the point that they cut off the blood flow to whatever that blood vessel goes to. And if it goes to your heart, what happens. If it builds up in your brain, what happens. If it builds up in your leg, then you will lose blood flow to the leg, and you'll start getting dead tissue. And they'll call it gangrene or whatever.
Speaker 3 ·
But this is the horrible thing. They pretend like they don't understand the mechanism of what is happening. Yeah. And the sad part, Miriam, is that they're pretending like that we you saw and we've always saw cases like this. You and I both know that. But never to this extent. It's like.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, no. Yeah. Because this shot was engineered to cause the endothelial damage, the damage to the inside of the blood vessel lining, and to cause the micro clotting, and to cause the associated fibrinogen production. And that's why if it, if somebody's a good really good scar and produces a lot of fibrinogen or has a really hyperactive immune system, they're gonna drop it immediately. But if they're not so good at it, it might take a year or two years or three years or five years for it to build up and cause a problem, , in an organ or an organ system.
Speaker 1 ·
And it's just horrifying. They knew exactly what they were doing, and it was done on purpose.
Speaker 3 ·
So you're pulling One of the things that they said too on that is there again, a lot of lot of them, even though they're seeing it, they aren't speaking up because they don't they still people, they don't want to lose their standing or whatever, their money, their standing. And that's that's the pathetic part. That's why we're still here doing this very night.
Speaker 2 ·
That's right. And to Miriam's point, , the planning of it so that we know that, , all of those injuries that Miriam was listing off would eventually happen. The goal was always to make sure that as many things could happen at a later date when it really wasn't as easy to tie to the vaccines themselves, which, by the way, has been happening for decades.
Speaker 2 ·
We allowed them to gaslight us on that stuff because they were injuring children who couldn't tell us what the what hurt, why was it hurting, what was wrong. And now we're starting to see the fruits of that is the only thing about COVID and that COVID, quote, unquote, vaccine that is good is that it has forced.
Speaker 2 ·
The hands of the experts.
Speaker 3 ·
And, , Sherry, I wanna say, like, back, for me to get into nursing school, I had to take the hepatitis b vaccine. And I'm telling you right now, all of what you're seeing here, we went through. You we got nobody to hear us. So it dev I, and you're talking early ninety that I had to take that. And I had to take six, but I have went through so much shit. But I didn't even understand to the extent that I do now because of what's happened here.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. And that's being a nurse. I'm just saying that because nobody would address the fact that they were damaging us back then is what I'm saying with that. Because Hippie was also that's why her and I got to be friends because we were both nurses from the same era, both from the hepatitis b vaccine, and look what happened to her.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep.
Speaker 0 ·
And that red redacted episode that Deborah referenced is, in the Purple Pill, if anyone wants to watch that.
Speaker 1 ·
I'm gonna I want to tell. She got over my pay grade. I don't think it's coincidence that, , they've been injuring people and children for decades, and they just gradually turned up the heat, and, , gradually so that we couldn't recognize what was happening and trusted the system. And, , they managed to perfect their methods to a greater degree. Still not still not to the greatest degree that they want to. It's not satisfactory to them yet.
Speaker 1 ·
But they are ever and always working on perfecting their methods for both an immediate kill and a slow kill weapon. And you're right, Deb. These shots are both immediate kill and slow kill.
Speaker 0 ·
And they masked that. They masked the immediate kill but with a bit of slight of hand in the protocol that said you are not considered fully vaccinated until two weeks after your second shot. And only then if you remain up to date with your subsequent boosters. And they certainly weren't transparent of that when they initially came out telling everyone it was safe and effective. A hundred percent effective in preventing the spread.
Speaker 1 ·
And that allowed them to label many of the early vaccine deaths within that first two weeks. They could label it as COVID or anything else. But anything but vaccination, causing it. So, we'll we'll never have a good statistical.
Speaker 0 ·
Grasp on what happened because of that slight of hand. Oh, my dog is squeaking to the ball. Yeah. For a minute, I thought mice had gotten into our space, but then I realized it's Balder with his squeaky He's.
Speaker 3 ·
Announcing his presence. But, one of the things that they this it still goes along with programming because people have accepted the word, unfortunately, the word protocol. They're accepting that word. We're talking about it, but as you we're talking as what happened, and they used it as murder. But they're still using it as a normal term that everybody uses every day. And so there, again, people don't it doesn't affect them. They don't they don't hear it. Well, protocols are good and useful,.
Speaker 0 ·
But common sense has to be imperative and to throw everything we know about medicine out the window in favor of rigidly adhering to any protocol for all individuals without any regard to that individual's medical history or what they what they even have, that's that's where it goes wrong. Like, I'm not averse to the use of protocols in general.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. But what I'm saying, Chelsea, is when you use the a protocol as a genocide, you might wanna come up with a different word for the things that are gonna help you. Because, , those of us who went through this, this is part of why we got sick and tired of hearing, all the things to do. What? Because these people already knew all this stuff.? And it's not like it just happened that they just learned this stuff. So I'm just saying they can.
Speaker 3 ·
Change your wording then because people don't look at it as what you're saying. I don't. That's I don't think. That's my own personal opinion.
Speaker 0 ·
Fair enough. Steve, welcome to the conversation. How are you doing? I know you're celebrating an achievement this week.
Speaker 6 ·
Yeah. Hi, everybody. Yeah. I am. I was shocked that one came in, and then the following day, my.
Speaker 6 ·
Clearance got upgraded for satellite. So that was cool.
Speaker 0 ·
Yeah. Tell us a little bit about what that is and why you're doing it, if you don't mind. Okay. That is one.
Speaker 6 ·
That was looking for infectious diseases in our environment. What we were.
Speaker 6 ·
Brought in and trained on was we looked in Ethiopia at malaria. Now malaria is carried by mosquitoes, so satellites can't see a mosquito, but we can see the environment. So you monitor the rainfalls, amount of rain, where water stores up, where it's gonna be for a while, temperature, , everything, temperature of the water, temperature of the air, temperature of the ground. And you can guess, or you can, , get a good idea of mosquitoes. They're gonna be really bad in this area. And then there's a village nearby, and that village,.
Speaker 6 ·
When we looked into doing this, you gotta take into consideration in Ethiopia when it comes to health care is, can you get to health care? Now that village was a long way out, so that was a primary problem, , for health care. So you take all that and you take their health records as well,.
Speaker 6 ·
University custom built software for Ethiopia. And you take in their health records and you mix it all into one big machine, And it does a lot of machine learning, but it can predict where the next outbreaks will come. And as you align it more and more with data that you can achieve and get, the more the merrier. The machine learning actually gets closer and closer to real numbers.
Speaker 6 ·
And we're just actually, I'm just starting to I didn't think I really use that in Canada because, , Ethiopia. Right? Malaria, we don't have that here. But in, indigenous communities, there's a lung infection going on, and it's caused by mushrooms and mushroom spores. Now I run along the same minds, with this training through NASA RSET, and I can take the basic of what I was taught and now apply it to their mushrooms. Same thing. They grow in humid areas. They like to be warm. They like to be moist. They like to be wet. The same thing with mosquitoes.
Speaker 6 ·
Right? Just mosquitoes need more standing water. And then we take the health records, and, again, we blend it in, and we blend it in with basically any data we can get from anywhere that's gonna benefit this project. And then the same thing, we can take indigenous communities. You gotta take human travel, sorry, into effect as well because things are actually passed back and forth faster by human travel. Back in the day, we could only be within our village and maybe make the next one of a couple days travel. Today, we can be there in a couple hours by car, plane, or train.
Speaker 6 ·
So you take everything in the concern, like I said, and then you can actually predict. Okay. Well, this year, it may be, , this area, and it's gonna be a bad year or a good year or whatever. But it gives residents, the way I'm doing it, a projected forecast for the for the reserves. So, therefore, they can prepare themselves for it. It's the same with the pipeline that Alberta wants to run through freaking BC. She's calling it a bitumen pipeline. If anybody knows oil and I didn't know this. I actually got taught this, and I was, like, surprised. But bitumen.
Speaker 6 ·
Is, again, it's it's like tar. Okay? It's not liquid. You cannot pump it. To pump this, you have to mix it with naphtha. Okay? It's a naphtha fuel. The same fuel you put in your Coleman lanterns and you go camping for the weekend. The only thing is they gotta mix a lot of it in it to make it liquid enough to go through a pipeline. This makes it extremely toxic. Now because I figured the government's gonna ram that through, I got in touch with indigenous communities in BC. I got them all, , basically, and told them, hey. Here's my videos that I've done,.
Speaker 6 ·
And here are satellites that I think will benefit you. We're looking more at the Canadian RadarSat two and the Canadian RCM. I chose that selection because RCN sees oil spills, and we're talking about a pipeline. Alright? And you can monitor it. Like, if they're building it towards or going by your community, you are able to get optical imagery. You can get infrared for at nighttime. You can get thermal.? Like, there's a whack of tools available. So I'm introducing this technology to indigenous communities basically, for our concerns. But there's the crunch of what I'm doing.
Speaker 0 ·
Wow. That is that is really interesting, and I admire your dedication and going through all that to learn all about that. And I'm I'm interested to hear where it goes from here. Thank you so much, Steve. Do you guys have any questions for Steve about what he's doing?
Speaker 6 ·
I just wanna add an extra thing. Through, the EU, I'm in with satellites there, and I'm also in with a secondary part which allows researchers in. This allows you to publish your research your papers. Through Canada, I now have the same ability, to do that. So we're gonna take all of our research, and we're gonna mash it together and do a really nice article and datasets. And it's gonna go available on, the Canadian Space Agency and the European Space Agency for other researchers, doctors, , and whoever to check out.
Speaker 0 ·
Interesting. Thank you so much.
Speaker 0 ·
I'd just like to take a minute to remind everybody that we are here every Saturday night to hear your stories about your experiences with COVID policies, protocols, and mandates. If you would like to share your story, we welcome you to press the mic in the bottom left hand corner of your screen, and we'll get you up here to say a few words. I have updated the guidelines for the space, which are pinned in the nest and at the top of the purple pill. So if you have not reviewed those and you're new, check those out.
Speaker 0 ·
And until we have, many people on to share your stories, we will talk amongst ourselves about all the various prongs of this attack these attacks and the various crimes against humanity we believe the world has been subject to. But we are primarily here to hear your stories, and our space can really only be as good as the stories that you choose to share with us. So please.
Speaker 0 ·
Consider coming up, and we will we will be nice. Go ahead, Laurie.
Speaker 5 ·
Thank you. Yeah. I have a question for Miriam. Miriam, did that study? It just came out not too long ago. I think it was, like, this past week on here on x that, , the unvaccinated women, like, I think it was, like, fifty percent.
Speaker 5 ·
They didn't take the shots, but they had mRNA like Pfizer in them. So what do you what do what do you think of that? Do you think that's do you think that was from sexual transmission from them, or do you think that was airlines like what I got with them in my car? What do what do you think of that study? Study was actually pregnant women that you're referring to,.
Speaker 1 ·
And they found it in the placenta and the blood. So.
Speaker 1 ·
There's several different mechanisms by which that could have been happening, but what they also have found that in the general population as well. Meaning, if you if you look at, Mary Talley Boden's post there, she posted probably three to four months back that she tested about 3, 000 patients, and all of her patients had some level of spike protein in their blood. Now the vaccinated were much, much higher in the sense that they were up in the seven to 8, 000 range. But literally, virtually every one of her patients, even the unvaccinated had levels somewhere around average 1, 000. So.
Speaker 1 ·
This is why I get highly agitated when I have people talking about, oh, I'm a pure blood. No. You're not. Because shedding is real and because everyone has been exposed. Whether or not you're symptomatic is another thing. Okay? And there's a lot of things that can help people rid their body of those things. There's many, many natural supplements. There's many, many means, fasting is one way, and there's many supplements. If you wanna read about that, there's an Substack author named Walter Chestnut,.
Speaker 1 ·
C h e s, no t. It's c h e s n u t, and he is always and forever coming up with things that actually reduce both the inflammation and the spike counts.
Speaker 0 ·
He is Parsifal
Speaker 1 ·
On x. Parsifal e Yeah. P a r s I f a l e r. So, , take advantage of that information. He's constantly writing and researching. There's many things that you can do, but we can't simply look at this as a vaxxed versus unvaxxed black and white issue anymore because it's not the entire humanity the entire of all humanity has been contaminated.
Speaker 3 ·
Okay? And part of it, Miriam, too is, like, you have to go back then to a HPV shot. All these we know that all of these have caused damage to our girls.
Speaker 3 ·
The COVID vaccine, yes, but it's been happening long before this. Right. There's nobody that doesn't have.
Speaker 1 ·
Some form of probably subclinical damage without symptoms or damage because they have done so much to us not just through injections and vaccines, but through everything in our environment from every prong of attack. So it's best, , you can't really go, I'm pure blood and you also can't go, well, I'm doomed because, , it's not gonna be that easy for them. That's why they're using the multi pronged attack. So the best thing is to take a realistic look at what's happening and develop a strategy and fight back.
Speaker 1 ·
Versus being in fear or giving up. You don't want to be on either side. You don't want to be in panic mode fear and you also don't wanna be, well, I might as well lay down and give up and die because neither one of those is going to help the problem. You need to see it for what it really is and take proactive steps to help yourself and others.
Speaker 3 ·
Well said.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, I just I get really agitated, not even so much about what's been done now, but because.
Speaker 1 ·
I see people being manipulated either into fear and panic or into stick my head completely in the sand and ignore it. Well, I'm sorry. Those are both horrible reactions to the situation. They don't do anything productive. You've got to be fully grounded and be proactive. And fear and panic doesn't doesn't work and sticking your head in the sand does not work.
Speaker 0 ·
Right. We can't be running around with our hair on fire about, oh, what's the next thing they're gonna, that's playing right into their hands. They want us talking about next pandemic. And the truth is these pandemic a worldwide pandemic event is a once in a century, if that occasion. And, , basically, they're they're predictive programming us with the bio war that we're going to be, every Tom, Dick, and Harry with an AI and a CRISPR can be concocting bioweapons in their basement, and they are in a way preparing us for that reality without alarming everyone.
Speaker 0 ·
And, also, they're still funding a lot of this with our own tax dollars. We know about the bio labs all over Ukraine and China and, where don't we have bio labs?
Speaker 1 ·
My question is to everyone. Do you wanna be a victim or a victor? Victim or Victor? Because honestly, if you're gonna let your hair be on fire and freak out, you're a victim and you will be a victim because you're not paying attention. You're not doing what you need to do. If you stick your head in the sand,.
Speaker 0 ·
Yes. You will be a victim as well and not a victor. Right? It's a it's a thin middle ground that we have to walk where we're we're never complacent. We're always hyper vigilant, but we're also not constantly living in fear.
Speaker 3 ·
And I also believe that we're at a point on life where you have to make that decision. You absolutely do have to. Pretend you don't know, but that's a decision.
Speaker 1 ·
It is a decision. And the thing is if there's one thing that really gets my goat is I will not be controlled or made a victim. I will I will suffer for the rest of my life before I will lay down and die and give in or before I will play the victim and roll over. Because, , I want to be an independent person and live my life even if it means suffering and resistance to these evil assholes. I'm just gonna say it. Okay? Because they win if you let your hair get on fire, or they win if you stick your head in the sand. So those aren't viable choices.
Speaker 0 ·
One of what I think the most twenty five things of 2025 was.
Speaker 0 ·
What we saw in BC with the ostrich cull. And ostriches, of course, are a symbol of sticking your head in the sand, and we saw what came of them. So there's a bit of a metaphor there, I think.
Speaker 3 ·
That's interesting that you say that, Chelsea. Give us the '25. I wanna know.
Speaker 3 ·
Do you really? I wouldn't have asked.
Speaker 0 ·
I'll send you a link on signal, Deb.
Speaker 2 ·
I'm
Speaker 3 ·
Just, really curious, though, because even though we haven't had all losses, there's no, we maybe we don't talk about those small wins we have. I don't know. Maybe I need a lift up. I don't know. Well, yes, I do know. I do.
Speaker 1 ·
Right now, it's honestly a win to, I think, not be either scared to death or trying to live oblivious. A win is being appropriately oriented and actually taking steps to resist. Right now, that's the win. Because honestly, , it's a big fight. That's the win is not to lose control of your own emotions, mind, and will under the pressure that we are living in, in the system that we are living in. That's the win, to retain your own free will and not lose your mind, emotions, and will inside that system.
Speaker 0 ·
So well said, Miriam. For anyone else who's curious about my curated list of the most twenty five things of 2025, I have put a link into the nest. You can click the hashtag. This is something I've been doing since 2020. And there haven't been a whole lot of things this year that I identified as the most twenty five things. But among those is the Orwell lecture being locked for replies. Like, that was pretty 2025 of 2025.
Speaker 1 ·
Wow. That's all I have for that. Wow.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. Go ahead, Laurie.
Speaker 5 ·
Yeah. Thank you for letting me speak again. Another thing is, like,.
Speaker 5 ·
Is anyone ever gonna really know the true number of all the people that were, , murdered in the hospitals?, where's where's the data on that? And then when I when I heard that they came out and said that there was only, , 10 children that were killed from the COVID shots, I know that's another, like, lie., I'm surprised they even admitted to it., I will give them credit that they actually acknowledged that, , there was actually innocent children that were killed from it. But we all know that 10 is.
Speaker 5 ·
That's a lie. I think it's a lot higher than that., what are your views on that if you don't mind me asking? Narrative control.
Speaker 1 ·
It's absolutely narrative control. And what? You don't have to think back very far to realize that when your parents catch you and having done something wrong,.
Speaker 1 ·
You'll admit the part of it just so that, , maybe they won't find out about the rest of it.? That way they're happy and they can give you their little bit of hand slap, and then you can just move on. Right? You're not gonna tell them everything you did wrong. If they bring it up, they go, did you do this? And if you've done two or three other things, you're not gonna admit it all. You'll admit the little bit you're caught in, And that's exactly what they're doing. They're admitting the little bit that they have to admit to and hope that the rest of it goes away.
Speaker 1 ·
It's a narrative control.
Speaker 0 ·
So much of what we're living through is narrative control. And the curators of the world are freaking out because they've lost control of that narrative. And the things that are filling the void almost warrant concern. And they are, , they are forming committees and hosting meetings and think tanks and trying to figure out how to get a handle on this. And the best thing they can come up with is, , look what they're doing in the in The UK or in Australia. They just passed the age requirement, is ostensibly.
Speaker 0 ·
To protect children from the evils of social media including sexual exploitation, but is actually a dragnet because now nobody can access social media without verifying your legal identity and providing a picture and proving your age. And this can be easily defeated, people are finding out with holding up a picture, literally holding up a photograph of someone who's over 16. But that doesn't matter. Most people won't figure that out, and they'll go ahead and scan their face so they can participate on their social media. And this is not actually being done in the interest of children.
Speaker 0 ·
Unfortunately, that is a mechanism that they've used for a long time, and it works so well. They're they're using it to implement their digital control schemes.
Speaker 3 ·
, Chelsea, though, a lot of people do not realize, I don't think.
Speaker 3 ·
I didn't realize as many cameras are on everything. You, you go through a stop sign, and they're taking your picture. Or not a stop sign, but a light. What? But they did it that even, , like, a little bit at a time, a little bit at a time, until people started getting used to that too. Like, , like I told you guys, when I moved in here, I had to do that's the first facial recognition that I did willingly ever. And I didn't and I only did it because I had nowhere else to go. I had to. So, see, I was forced into doing something I didn't wanna do.
Speaker 0 ·
You had to do that to get your apartment. Is that right? Yes. I had to do it to I was trying to sign up on Etsy because, , we have lots of cactus out here. And I'm like, people love cactus. So I was gonna sign up on Etsy. And it not only is it $30, but also once you get that or in advance of giving them your money, they make you take a photo of yourself. And then they'll tell you have to check a box. Can we use your biometric data or not? Like but you're giving them your biometric data either way.
Speaker 0 ·
So I don't know. Is that to give people a like, oh, don't worry about it. We're not actually using your biometrics as they use your biometrics. But don't worry. We're deleting the picture after you do it. And this is for everything from getting an apartment to selling something online, and they're gonna be using it for everything. You'd see it increasingly as a security measure on various platforms, including now this one.
Speaker 2 ·
I am I you said Etsy and it just triggered me. So you who wanted to legitimately sell something on Etsy were required or requested or however you wanna put it to put a picture of yourself up and let the algorithm scan your damn face. But you can go to Etsy and hire a freaking witch to cast a spell on somebody.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. That's an upstanding platform. Never mind. Rolling my eyes. Everybody can Wow. That's interesting.
Speaker 0 ·
Yeah. Needless to say, I did not complete sign up, and I've been, I haven't really been spending a lot of time on it, but I did create a website where I can do that, , on my own without that third party. But the problem with doing that is then nobody finds you. And this is the paradigm of social media. Like, you don't have to use social media. You can create your own site, but then nobody's gonna see a thing you say or do because you're compartmentalized on that site. Somebody has to put in a search term and then actually find that site.
Speaker 0 ·
And so you're you're stuck with what they give you on these everything platforms.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, boy. I'm getting to where I hate to hear that word everything platforms because that's one of, Elon Musk's big projects. He's x everything app.
Speaker 0 ·
And he is he's making progress towards turning it into that, if you noticed recently, and it's so buggy. But they've rolled out, chat which replaces messages, which of course are your DMs, your direct messages, your personal messages with other individuals and groups on this platform. So now you have to opt in to the chat, but messages, it's still there and the two aren't communicating with each other. So sometimes you'll load the page and you'll get messages. Sometimes you'll load the page and you get chat.
Speaker 0 ·
Sometimes the message is in one and not the other, and messages are thereby slipping through the cracks and it's just such a terrible mess. So, , he's got big aspirations turning this into an everything app, but he's he can't even maintain the functionality that Twitter had to begin with. So, I don't think they'll be achieving their, development goals on that.
Speaker 0 ·
And they just keep breaking it. Like, spaces are still buggy. What's it been like? Three months now?
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. It doesn't inspire confidence, but all, for those who wish for an everything app, but it actually makes me quite happy since I don't want an x everything app. So yeah. It depends on your point of view, I suppose, doesn't it?
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. They basically they want he said Elon Musk said that he wants the x direct messaging platform to be as good as Signal. And sorry, buddy. You're a long ways off achieving that. Signal is far and away, I think, the superior messaging platform. And if you're not using it, you should be and get on there and come talk to us because it is it is, it is the better platform. And, yes, it's probably run by the CIA,.
Speaker 0 ·
And I wouldn't trust that encryption with a 10 foot pole. But you have to take it for granted that somebody's watching everything you say or do on any platform or now in your living room anyway.
Speaker 0 ·
Pretty much. Go ahead, Steve.
Speaker 6 ·
Alright. Thank you. With the platforms, yeah, you just heard Canadians may have to give up five years of their social media, to enter The United States, so that's a worry. But when it comes down to research and labs, you're right. They could be everywhere, and god knows. But there's both the good and the bad in that. I wanna open my own lab, my own research, on our water and pollution.
Speaker 6 ·
We do have, Dantar here in Espanola, a lumber mill or sorry. A paper mill, that was spewing toxic effluent out into the water. I narrowed it down. I'm pretty sure that it's, called black liqueur. It's very toxic. It also could be called craft liqueur because they ran a special craft line. But there's you gotta remember there's there's both the good and the bad to everything.
Speaker 0 ·
That is so true, Steve. AI, for example, I'm I'm just absolutely in awe of the new developments in artificial intelligence just over the last week. There are going to be just breakthrough strides in this technology, and it is as someone who grew up, , in the video game age and the personal computer age when all of that started and who was very engaged in technology watching this take off and really just explode has been as exciting as it is scary and ominous. And already, I'm seeing AI capable of replacing my job. So I don't think it has, like, the over the agentic.
Speaker 0 ·
Where it could just completely take over for me and do all the things. But as far as developing, deploying, styling, all of the things that go into website development and production, it's it's already just about just about replaced me. And it's that sucks, but also, , it expedites my workflow a lot. I can get so much more done in the course of the day. We've, over the last twenty four hours, developed, like, four different functional apps that do various things that will enhance our lives in various ways.
Speaker 0 ·
And it's really just a matter of time now until everybody figures out that this exists before all of the jobs go poof, I think. And it's it's coming for creative gigs first, but it's coming for, blue collar, white collar. Probably blue collar will be last. But this is it's happening. It's happening quicker than anybody thought. There's a lot of people talking about it's a bubble and it's an illusion and da. Go play with it. Go to aistudio.google.com and spend 20 minutes just give it a prompt to create something that would enhance your life in some way.
Speaker 0 ·
And then gape in amazement as it hands it to you on a platter, fully functional.
Speaker 3 ·
, Chelsea, I've seen Elon. I don't know on what I watch so much stuff and my head's overloaded, but he's I saw him saying on some something that,.
Speaker 3 ·
It would get to a point people could work if they just wanted to. It wouldn't be a requirement anymore.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah, Deb. That was at the US Saudi investment forum the week before Thanksgiving. He was sitting there talking about the fact that so many jobs will be replaced by AI that people will be able to choose or not choose to work and that's the reason for universal basic income because, basically, there won't be jobs, very few available that humans will be doing. And so he's a big proponent of universal basic income. And I do believe, with the fast tracking that they're doing that they will absolutely have to do digital money and a financial reset and then offer people universal basic income.
Speaker 1 ·
Because the fastest way to get people up in arms is to take their jobs, take their money, and have them not be able to survive. So, , they don't want that. They want us to go quietly into the night. And the way that they will do that is give us a basic income and do what you've all know Noah Harari said, give them video games, drugs, and a basic income, and they'll all sit back and do what they're told. And that's exactly what they're planning.
Speaker 6 ·
The one thing you guys are forgetting about with AI, though, AI uses a lot of power.
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, we thought of that too, Steve. Have you heard about what is it, Adam? SMRs. SMRs? Small modular reactors. The small modular reactors they've just tested for 38 iterations.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. And I've already seen one of those here in Kentucky. They have very near to Fort Knox, own individual, data center. And they have this concrete enclosed round structure sitting very near the data center. And I'm looking at that going, -huh. Yeah. I know what that is.
Speaker 0 ·
But this is this is going to happen so quickly now with safe nuclear power on the ready just sitting there waiting for us to pick up and AI thirstily drinking up every bit that it I just read something about Oracle., the huge company Oracle. They are planning to run their huge AI data center off thousands of generators because the power the grid is not prepared to accommodate them. And that's gonna cost something like a billion dollars over the course of a year to run their data center on generators,.
Speaker 1 ·
And that's how hungry they are for this power. And what generators are those? Are those diesel and gas generators, or are those another kind? Because if it's wanna if it if it's diesel and gas, we're looking at all of our energy costs going through the roof, get ready for paint at the pump.
Speaker 0 ·
And that's why the this nuclear will be picked up because it's it, these things are commiserate. They have to be if the AI is sitting there waiting to do literally everything and all that's stopping it is availability and power, and there's this solution that's just been proven safe through all of this taste testing, then what's the what's the downside to implementing that? And I can find that And I want screenshot and pinned it to the nest if you're interested in what Oracle's doing. Yes.
Speaker 1 ·
And I'm gonna find a post that I posted in the last day or two. There is a circular revenue scheme going on between Oracle, Nvidia, SoftBank, and one other player, basically, where they're paying one is paying the other with the same money all the way through the whole circle, and yet they're in about a $54, 000, 000, 000 deficit. And so if they do not correct this and start generating funds within the next thirty six months, their little scheme fails to get all of their data centers built. And so I can promise you that in this next thirty six months,.
Speaker 1 ·
They will be figuring out a way to make sure they finish that, and they will be finding the power no matter what it takes. Because if they don't do it, their entire scheme fails. And you gotta remember, their entire financial grid, the crypto and digital money system is dependent upon AI and that they're having the data centers running to make that happen. So it's all intertwined. So you can bet your money over the next thirty six months. We're going to see some major things happening in the energy sector, in nuclear power.
Speaker 0 ·
Yeah. Because they it's a it's a it's a do or die proposition for them now. And for those who are just tuning in who are wondering, well, how the heck is this related to COVID related crimes against humanity? It's because COVID was the test run for all of these things. They were not just testing, lockdowns for their fifteen minute cities. They weren't just testing UBI with the pandemic bailouts. They were they were also gauging how everyone would do if they were put out of work for months and months and months at a time. And.
Speaker 0 ·
It's it's a bitter irony that Miriam really highlighted for me earlier this week that those who complied, those medical professionals, those doctors who followed the protocols and went ahead and compromised their values to urge compliance with nonsensical mandates and all the rest. The irony that they could have just held to their convictions for a few more years and they're gonna be out of a job anyway, I think is, that's a big one.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, it's a very big one. And you have to realize, , AI is at the center of not just the financial system, not just the power needs, but also AI is now beginning to be implemented to run the Medicare program and health care. So you gotta realize there's a nexus there. All this is intertwined. And you also, if you were here about three months ago, and I'll see if I can find it, someone did a graphic that showed where all the manufacturing centers were in The US. And they showed how as those disappeared, health care then took over as the major revenue generator versus.
Speaker 1 ·
Factories and production. So you gotta realize that health care, AI, the financial system, our national economy, about 70% of it is health care related revenue. So you cannot extricate finance and health care and money and our monetary system. They're all inextricably intertwined, and it is coming that it's going to be one system,.
Speaker 3 ·
And it's all functioning as one. So Maryam, can I add because you'll I'll need you on this one again? There were I saw something else, but you'll know probably where it was at. I don't. Where doctors were it was some article or something where doctors were starting to fear their jobs.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes., that is most definitely happening. For those that don't know, I'll find my Substack in a minute and put that up. I'll also put up the post from a couple of She told you she'd know. But.
Speaker 1 ·
They are fearing obviously for it because, again, , they know that AI is coming. And if you look, I will find it, but there was a bill in congress, the US congress last year. It's h r two thirty eight, and they already have that introduced. And they're and the only reason it's sitting there, this is how the congress operates, is they will introduce it and get it moving through the system so that when it's time to drop that bill, they can do it overnight. This is why they all complain, oh, I didn't have time to read it.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, that's because it was written months in advance, prepped, already introduced, and then they put it up for a vote just like that. And this bill allows AI to write prescriptions and function as a health care provider in that respect. Do you think that is coincidental that was in congress last year? And now this year, we have Stargate data centers,.
Speaker 0 ·
Etcetera, etcetera. And the Manhattan Project Scale Exactly. AI endeavor they've labeled Genesis.
Speaker 1 ·
No. And none of that is coincidence. That is the entire system coalescing. Okay? And this is all the more reason why you want to maintain your health because you do not want to be a victim to that system.
Speaker 3 ·
, the beginning of that was the electronic scripts., that's how they begin their little.
Speaker 1 ·
, they don't have to It's all it's all sold to the health care professionals as Yep. Now you don't have to write it. You don't have to worry about the pad getting stolen or somebody co opting it. But here's the thing. They have complied themselves right out of the job, right out of relevancy. Because now AI can do their job because all they do guys, we've been talking about protocols. They lit they say, okay. What symptoms do you have? Oh, tick, tick, tick, tick off the boxes. Oh, well, protocol says if you have those symptoms that this is your number diagnosis on the ICD 10 codes.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, click that box. Now all I have to do is click the electronic prescription and send you a drug. Well, guess what? AI can do that a 100 times faster than any human being. So they have they have complied themselves and convenience themselves right out of a job. And what? They made a lot of money for the hospitals. They kept their cushy jobs, their 4 figure jobs, their houses, their cars. But what? Now about five years later, they're gonna they're gonna lose everything that they sold their soul for.
Speaker 0 ·
I think that is a point that we should drive home to those who enabled these schemes to continue for so long until they really get it. And, honestly, they should feel bad.
Speaker 3 ·
But remember Unfortunately, though, that might be what it takes to wait. What? That will wake you up.
Speaker 3 ·
And you might have to eat some crap, but you're gonna save yourself because that's human nature.
Speaker 0 ·
But I also, it doesn't have to be.
Speaker 0 ·
The horror that people fear in replacing., what they want the policy that they've put forward is basically you will own nothing and be happy, where you'll rent everything. You'll you'll live a transient life in a pod and you'll eat the bugs and you'll be in compliance and you'll be taken care of with some nice cushy UBI. This is bad, and I believe it's been roundly rejected. Even the architects of these policies are apologizing, realizing that what they work towards is not what's actually being done. And, and in instead of that, there is an alternative. My husband, Adam,.
Speaker 0 ·
Wrote about, thought about, came up with an alternative to this. Recently, he wrote about it on his substack, and it is penned in the nest, the end the end of a need for human labor does not mean to end does not need to mean the end of The US economy or of capitalism. And his article is a policy prescription for the future. And basically, it's taking what we learned from the COVID policies that we're here railing about every week and actually doing something positive with what we learned from those. And putting in place something like a pandemic.
Speaker 0 ·
Unemployment benefit, but this time for when your job is taken over by AI. Because the value that you produced will still be being produced and in large part because you were producing it and the AI was able to learn from you to take over that position, then what's the harm in compensating that person, at that point, at that level, or a bit above, for the rest of their life, because their job is done. The AI can take it from there. Their value is still being produced, and there's no harm, no foul. And this, , if we could get it to the attention of the right people, might be.
Speaker 0 ·
A viable alternative to the digital enslavement and UBI communism schemes that they've proposed. We keep capitalism. We keep we don't have to go through a paradigm shift as far as our founding principle. But we can continue into a post scarcity utopia where everyone still has enough to get what they need, what they want even, and can stay home and watch TV if they want, or they can continue to produce value if they want. And then, , the whole the world is your oyster at that point.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I would hope that somewhere in the system they would consider that. I think it just remains to be seen if those that literally then control the system are, able to tamp down their greed and actually appropriately compensate people, and that's a big if.
Speaker 3 ·
I have a question. Isn't that so a just a nice way of accepting what they're doing?
Speaker 1 ·
I'm confused. Well, , long and short, they're I think they're going to do it. The question is, how are we going to function, survive, and resist enabling it? That's the question., I would love to think that we could stop the system, but, , I noticed two years ago, the data center is being built. Before there was any common knowledge, I was driving right past the first one about 35 miles north of where I live. And I actually wrote a sub stack about it at the time, based on some things I had seen. And, so and that's continued to progress.
Speaker 1 ·
And two years later, now it's openly being talked about once Trump stood on the stage on his second day in office and announced Stargate. So, , they've if they started building them with and, again, this picture is exactly like the other star the other Stargate Centers that are in Texas and all that, but it was here in Kentucky two years ago. So that they didn't just start building those two years ago. They had plans for it years before that. So, , I don't think there's any stopping this training. The question is, how do we resist it? How do we function?
Speaker 0 ·
I think that's the question. That's just it, Miriam. This is happening one way or another. If we can shape it, if we can influence its trajectory, then we might have.
Speaker 0 ·
We might have hope. We might have the best of all worlds at our disposal. It just depends on whether we, the people, have any say in this or whether the architects of the great reset implement their agendas.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. And you have to look at what the core of their agenda is. And the core of their agenda is depopulate as far down as 500, 000, 000 if they can achieve it.
Speaker 1 ·
Because, honestly, once you have a system where very few jobs are needed, you don't need very many people. Right? And so the question is, will they be able to do that? And that's so that's one way you stop the full implementation is refusing to die. Okay? Because, literally, that's why they want to depopulate. Then that way, they can run their electronic control grid over 500, 000, 000 people worldwide. They can have enough power to run it, and then they literally own everything, and the 500, 000, 000 own nothing.
Speaker 1 ·
That's what it comes down to. So the more of us that stay alive and continue to repopulate and live our lives, we're winning just by existing.
Speaker 3 ·
And what, Miriam? Part we forget too. Not only did a lot of us wake up, but a lot of the countries around us woke up too.
Speaker 1 ·
Correct. There's a lot of suffering gonna go on. We already all know that. You might as well face that back. Well, they're facing a conundrum because you have to have a one world connected digital system to control the world. You, you have to logically have that. But if the system is connected, then the people are connected too, the people that exist. So then your plans get out and it makes it harder for you to achieve it. So, , they can't really have it both ways. You if you have a connected system, you have connected people.
Speaker 1 ·
That are part of the system. So it makes it harder for them, and let's continue to make it harder for them.
Speaker 6 ·
But I'm I'm confused. You guys are saying like, first of all, AI is gonna win hands down. You can't stop the development of it. AI has been involved in Canadian health care for a while. Canada tops AI in development and research. I use it in my research all the time. I use it in NASA. I use it in EU, and I use it on, Canadian satellites all the time. AI is it's built and driven. Machine learning, built and driven. But hold on. You're saying that AI is gonna take over everybody's jobs. We're gonna have a one pay level, and that's gonna be comfortable for everybody. No. But then you're saying.
Speaker 6 ·
And I know this because I researched it as well. But then you're basically saying, oh, wait a minute. We can't afford everybody. Half a million or a billion of you has gotta go. No.
Speaker 0 ·
And what I wanna be really clear about is the architects of the great reset were very shortsighted. They were assuming we continue to live in a world of scarcity. What's going to happen very quickly with the advent of free, safe nuclear power and AI everywhere is it's not those dynamics are going to be as obsolete as they think we are. So what I'm saying is what Adam's proposal that he's put forward is and what I think makes a lot of sense is to take from what we learned with the their pandemic assistance model where the all but the essential workers, remember, were.
Speaker 0 ·
Couldn't go to work. They had to stay home, and so they were compensated at the level that they were earning at that time. So in this case, it would be a little above that because why not make everyone comfortable? So you get this unemployment benefit once the AI takes over your job that is commensurate with what you're used to earning, and you get that for the rest of your life because you don't your value in that capacity has been fulfilled for the rest of your life by the AI, and then you can pursue whatever you want and everyone continues to earn at the level that they were before.
Speaker 0 ·
This happened. And if something like this isn't implemented, very soon we are going to see everybody out of work and nobody knowing what to do. And this is going to be a crisis a lot sooner than anyone realizes, I think.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And I think I agree with you there, Chelsea, because they're trying to avoid a powder keg. Because when if and when AI puts many, many, many people out of jobs, they're not doing it because they're being nice giving you that income. They're doing it to avoid the powder keg effect. Okay? And don't get me wrong. The AI in itself is not the problem. You're right. The AI is a great tool, Steve. I have used it for certain things myself. I don't use it for other things, but.
Speaker 1 ·
That tool is great. But when you when it becomes to the point that it's plugged in where jobs are disappearing and people are put out of work, the people that are at the top of the system have two choices. Allow the powder keg to happen or provide income to people. Because if there's one thing that will get people really worked up is you take their job and they don't have a way to live to their custom standards, you're going to have a serious powder keg.
Speaker 3 ·
And then you still have the generation that doesn't understand any of it. But that already happened.
Speaker 6 ·
That happened. AI didn't even start that. That happened with robotics. When robotics came into the automotive industry and started taking jobs, everybody was screaming about it the exact same way everybody's screaming about AI. But here's the thing. The That's a very good point, Steve., that's a excellent jobs those guys lost. If I own the company and I own the robotics and I put the money into it, why do I gotta pay them?
Speaker 0 ·
You don't. The government because the government money printer go burr, the government writes you a check for unemployment at the rate you were earning at the point you got phased out for AI.
Speaker 0 ·
Steve, done the sorry, Miriam. I've pinned the link from Adam Gartner speaking of post scarcity up in the nest. Read that over and I would be very interested to hear your thoughts.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And I agree with what Steve is saying, but he's talking on a much smaller scale robotics, , in a particular in few industries. We're not talking about AI running like Oh, it is.
Speaker 1 ·
It yeah. Talking about at national and global scale is what we're talking about. And I understand that. Look at China.
Speaker 6 ·
When China was introducing technology and technology was coming out, we didn't grab computers and robotics. Canada didn't. USA didn't.
Speaker 1 ·
But look at China. Look how much robotics they have. Look how much computer and AI driven their country is. And look how they don't have any freedom at all and how controlled they are in the social credit system. And that's what we're talking about. This is the end result of the system, that is now being pushed. It's it's not about efficiency for businesses, for robotics, to build more things, to manufacture more, to provide the increased community, increased productivity and increased economy. This is beyond that. This is an entire sea change relative to the monetary system, the.
Speaker 0 ·
And everything. Literally everything. Everything.
Speaker 6 ·
And it's on a huge macro scale. Yeah. I understand what you're saying, but, no, you're wrong. It's on a scale that you guys can imagine. It is on an economical scale. Okay? Those economics is cash. How do you get it? You gotta be trading back and forth between countries. Okay? If you're not making a product and you're not selling that product, you're not making any money.
Speaker 0 ·
That's the beauty of this scheme is that the product continues to be made. Your labor continues to be being produced. It's just automated.
Speaker 6 ·
Again, I own my own company in Canada, and I deal with AI. And if it takes over a job, I'm not gonna pay that person, and I'm not gonna pay into a policy.
Speaker 0 ·
That's gonna pay that person. Paying for everyone who goes in and applies for MAID. You're paying for their euthanasia. Where do you draw the line, Steve?
Speaker 6 ·
You tell me. Because, , I also watch stuff down in The USA where, , like, no offense with your president and the, that steam vows and stuff. But, , where do you draw the line in anything anymore? Oh, yeah. Is gone.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. You can't offend us with our president. We're the we're the ones that are upset with him with Palantir and AI because he on day two laid this the beginning of this plan out. And again, , the US dollar is what, it is the driving monetary fiat system. And when he says he wants this country to be the crypto capital of the world, keyword world, Okay? And the AI capital of the world, keyword, world. Okay? And it is not accidental that ISO 222, which is super national and global and instant, It's replacing the swift system, and it's already gone live.
Speaker 1 ·
So all the puzzle pieces are coming together for this system. And so it's gonna be well above individual business owners. It's gonna be at the national and super national level because it is all economic monetary financial and health care centralized. And health care is big money, billions.
Speaker 0 ·
Right. The nice part about this scheme, Steve, is that you continue to run your business, only you probably won't need to be near as dialed in as you currently are because even some of your own processes will be automated. And all of those employees that you had paid to come in every day still continue to make whatever they were making when they were gainfully employed with you. You continue to produce those products, only now the AI is doing the work of your entire workforce.
Speaker 0 ·
The products continue to sell. People continue to buy them because they have money in their pocket because they're still getting paid at the level they were and life continues to go on.
Speaker 1 ·
Right. And because there's so little perceived disruption, the system will be accepted just like it was in China. Okay? But the thing is now the person who is really in control is not the individual business owner. It is at the national and supranational level, and that's the problem., I again, there's many nice things about the system. There's many not so nice things about it where, , if you say or do something they don't like and it's linked to a social credit system,.
Speaker 1 ·
Then, , you can have your account shut down. You can you, right now, the current dinosaur version of it is being debanked. Well, it's gonna be much easier in the digital monetary system and AI run system.
Speaker 6 ·
And I understand that, but also, just hold on for a second. I had a thought, and I lost it there. But.
Speaker 6 ·
I understand what you're saying, but it doesn't fit the social aspect of us being humans. Again.
Speaker 0 ·
Again, go take it just a couple minutes. It's not a long read. And read Adam's actual proposal because I may have put it.
Speaker 0 ·
Forth poorly, and he has a way with words. Just look it over because you're a you're a smart guy, and then come back and tell me if you if the wisdom in that or if you still have issues with it because I would really be interested to hear Okay. That's on your website. Right? It's right at the top of the nest right now under speaking of post scarcity. Do that? Yeah.
Speaker 1 ·
And, Chelsea, I have to say, I don't see it as wisdom or not wisdom. I see it's part of what they're going to do to make sure the powder cake doesn't blow.
Speaker 0 ·
One way well, what they're planning to do, I believe, is to roll out UBI on us, which is what Steve's afraid of. Everyone gets a lump sum, and we're basically in we're we're dumped into communism suddenly, where everybody's getting a check for the same amount from the government. And then guess what? The price of everything goes up. Your rent goes up a thousand dollars because your landlord knows you're getting that thousand dollars, and everything collapses from there.
Speaker 0 ·
This is a different model. This is not UBI. This is everyone collects unemployment already., if you lose your job, you collect unemployment. This is that, but on a on a grand scale and on a permanent basis. So you also you have security moving forward that you'll continue to earn at the level you were.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I think we're gonna see one of those two things happen for sure because if you don't have one or the other, when these jobs disappear, you will have absolute chaos and powder cake. People, , they'll let you inject them and be sick and really not rise up a whole lot. You take their money, you take their ability to, purchase what they want and live their lives, that's when you're gonna see people just lose their minds., it's not so it will be either what you're saying, Chelsea, or UBI, or some combination thereof. Unless they're just gonna let everything.
Speaker 0 ·
Devolve to blood in the streets., what are people gonna do when they're out of work for nine months, twelve months, and the bread lines are overflowing and you can't feed your kids? What are people gonna do?
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. So, , there will be something there. But believe you me, as with anything that these people do, there's going to be a control mechanism there as well. You don't get anything for free. They always have a reason for giving you anything, offering you anything.
Speaker 0 ·
So yeah. And to bring it back around to COVID, there's a very good reason that the solution to, oh, how will we know who's vaccinated and can take off their mask? How will we know who's vaccinated and I can allow into my restaurant? We need vax pass. We need we need to verify people's vaccination status. You had cops taking children from tables at diners because they weren't they couldn't prove their vaccination status. And that was all the chaos of that was to facilitate demand for, oh, this is too chaotic. We need that verification to make this go smoother.
Speaker 0 ·
And the VAX pass was just a test run for the digital ID that they're trying to roll out just a few years later, especially in Europe right now.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And without that digital ID system, none of the rest of it will work. You have that central to it. So yeah.
Speaker 0 ·
And the power that is at their disposal as soon as they connect all those dots, which is why Palantir is being given the proverbial keys to the castle in the form of all the data unified from all the disparate government agencies in one data because they can already determine they think they know you better than your spouse.
Speaker 0 ·
Based on a 100 likes based on a 100 likes. So think about if they think you they know you better than your own spouse knows you based on a thousand likes on social media and your engagement with whatever content they're throwing at you. Then imagine how well they think they know you when they have your kindergarten history, your medical history, your entire record of anything you've ever done.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. They have your financial history, your medical history, your basic social history from all the social media platforms. And you've got AI that can look at all of that in a heartbeat and can assign you a score, can stratify everyone.
Speaker 0 ·
And it's it's really very predict what you're gonna do. Then they not only do they know what you're gonna be willing to buy, so now prices are variable. They're already implementing this. And what I think it's Instacart, if you go on Instacart Yep. You're gonna be given different prices than your neighbor based on what Instacart thinks they can get away with charging you for that. Right. And the thought crime is real. They're already implementing these thought crime things. I think they're using them in The UK to predict, , when is that racist extremist going to,.
Speaker 0 ·
Retaliate for being stabbed or whatever it is.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, think about how efficient AI will be with the mean policing., UK is The UK is already pretty good at that, and we had several incidences of it. I believe it was last year. Was it last year when the FBI was showing up and all the videos were popping up, showing up at people's door? It was here in The US. So, , again,.
Speaker 1 ·
You don't have to look very hard to see the handwriting on the wall of how every how it's all being centralized so that you've got, , the data plus the operating system, data centers. They're starting to work on the power, and now we've got the financial system starting to shake, with Japan being unable to buy our debt. It's I can see it coalescing. I don't think it's coincidence at all.
Speaker 0 ·
At this point, there are no coincidences. And these are very long laid plans. Those orchestrators of these agendas are playing a very long game, and they do everything by incrementalism, baby stepping us towards the dystopian future. And that's why COVID was so big because it, you can already see the consequences in our social dynamics, for example. A whole generation of kids doesn't know how to socialize offline. And, , relationships are breaking down. People are marrying their chatbots symbolically. And.
Speaker 0 ·
It's it's it's really scary to think where we'll be in a few years if we don't get a handle on this.
Speaker 1 ·
It most certainly is.
Speaker 1 ·
It is I can't think of an avenue that isn't pointing in that same direction toward a ultimate one financial system, social credit system, control grid, with integration of AI, a one health care health care system as envisioned by the WHO and the UN with a global digital health care, cert certification network. And like I said, I'm not trying to scare people, I'm just saying these are the pieces that they're openly talking about. And in order to have a One Health system, you have to have a system that those certificates can reside on.
Speaker 1 ·
So, again, it seems that they're building all of those pieces.
Speaker 0 ·
And as if one world health isn't bad enough or one world government, I've seen recently the murmurings of the surfacing of what they're calling a one world religion. And I haven't I haven't looked at all into that, but I do know that in Canada, are considering actually outlawing, criminalizing parts of the bible as so called hate speech. And I have to wonder how long it'll be till they use an AI model to rewrite.
Speaker 3 ·
The bible into a Well, they already have. You guys are just you all you're talking about go read the book of Revelations.
Speaker 1 ·
There already is an AI bible, by the way.
Speaker 3 ·
They've already it's already been done. Before AI takes over, go read the book of Revelations. The little the dog that sells.
Speaker 0 ·
The old palm olive commercial? You're soaking in it.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. Yeah. There already is an AI bible, and I was reading an article the other day where up to 80% of the pastors are already using AI to write their sermons for them. So they're getting very, very comfortable. And the problem with that is that AI frequently hallucinates and makes stuff up. So, , that's one area where I will not depend upon AI, and I do not depend upon AI for my actual research. I might use it to gather a bunch of links, but I go look at every one of those actual links.
Speaker 1 ·
And read the content and make sure, and then I do further research based on that content. I'm not going to blindly allow AI to write my sub stacks or provide me information because it is not reliable.
Speaker 0 ·
No. And that's another thing that people do not realize is that it is not as even as I say, it's poised to take over all of our jobs. Like, I'm not saying tomorrow. This is going to happen over time. And right now, it is not capable of you cannot trust it to the degree that people are already outsourcing, their own work to AI, in the realm of, teaching and learning. You have college professors using AI to output their curriculum and then students using AI to complete it. At this point, is anybody actually doing anything? Sorry, Deb. Go ahead.
Speaker 3 ·
Oh, I didn't say anything. You were gonna you were gonna, and I talked right over you. You'll Oh, no. You're you're fine. Go ahead.
Speaker 2 ·
I would I would like to add just so everybody here can have a chuckle and a head shake as Chelsea says that AI hallucinates. So my son and I were having a conversation about the Charlie Kirk assassination today, And he asked me if Charlie had ever had any neck surgery prior to his assassination, and I didn't know. So he pulls out his phone and he gets on Grock, and he said, basically, that has Charlie Kirk or did Charlie Kirk ever have any surgeries on his neck or spine prior to 09/10/2025?
Speaker 2 ·
Grock came back and told him that Charlie Kirk was shot at Jacksonville University, on while on campus and had ended up in the was hospitalized in critical condition, had two surgeries, and died after eight days.
Speaker 2 ·
Always ask for your sources to be cited by anything you get from an AI.
Speaker 0 ·
And then go actually review those sources because the AI is eager to please and will happily just make anything up and hand it to you.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I'm convinced. I had a mother-in-law who had Alzheimer's dementia and, , it's well known that when they have missing memories, they will just fill in other things that can even be nonsensical or almost approaching reality to where if you don't know the true situation, you will think that they're telling you the truth. Okay? So I think that, , AI functions much in that same way. If it has a blank spot, it'll pull something that's close to it and pop it right on in there whether it's the truth or not. It's pretty funny.
Speaker 0 ·
Right. People don't understand what AI even is and even a lot of the people working with it don't understand it fully. But it's basically, it's just an auto complete but on a on a large scale. So it will it'll say whatever it thinks is the most likely thing it should say at the time. Yeah. Whatever's close and similar,.
Speaker 1 ·
It's a close enough match. And it's not sentient. It's just working on something that's closer or close match in that context.
Speaker 3 ·
So you can't trust it. You have still have to use your own brain. Yes. Because I believe our god gave told us that we had to have knowledge. Otherwise, we would fall for this stuff.
Speaker 3 ·
And I don't think so I don't think I think AI has its power, but I think there's a power on the other side that it's gotta deal with. Because human.
Speaker 3 ·
I
Speaker 0 ·
Don't know. I'll leave it there. There is something unique and special about humanity, and we have to maintain that. And we have to reassert that in the face of all that they'll be throwing at us. And I believe that's part of the, , the trans phenomena and the devaluation of life is all the groundwork paving the way for this dystopian future that we cannot allow.
Speaker 6 ·
Go ahead, Steve. Okay. Thank you. I read the article. It's an interesting article. All points I'm not gonna agree on. One, nuclear, power is not safe. I'll introduce Chernobyl in Japan as, two nuclear accidents, with pertaining to nuclear reactors. Canada's nuclear reactors, I know when they fire up and they're running, tritium is, made in tritium, attaches itself to water. Now nuclear reactors have to be cooled. Of course, you can meet it by lake wherever, something like that. Now that tritium jumps from the heavy water in the nuclear reactor out to the lake waters.
Speaker 6 ·
And, again, I'm this is my concern, and I'd like people to understand. When you mine, look in Canada, look for the Victor Mine in Ontario. Take a look at it. Use Google historical photos. Take a look at what they did with that big open pit. We now have a big lake., no soil testing done. Nothing. It just.
Speaker 6 ·
Build it up. Removed all the buildings like Canada says and build it up. Now, again, back to nuclear power being, quote, quote, safe, Long Island should be a remark down there for you guys.
Speaker 6 ·
Also, what are you gonna do with all that fuel? I know in my area, there's a small town, and they're bidding on a government contract to bury nuclear fuel. Okay. That's fine. We're gonna bury it. Eventually, it's gonna get filled up and sealed up. But what's gonna happen a couple hundred years down the road? Where is that nuclear waste gonna go? And, again, that's into underground water sources that feed lakes and wells? Yeah.
Speaker 1 ·
All valid questions. The thing is, , they're hell bent on having their data centers to drive their system. So yeah., for that level of elitist being so concerned about, oh, climate change, the world's gonna end. They sure aren't worried about poisoning the environment with these things. But, again, they're hell bent on making sure that they get the power they need to establish this system.
Speaker 6 ·
Yes. And, you're right. They are hell bent because your prime sorry. Your president, Donald Trump, brought an economicist or an the guy that deals with money and shit, economicy, whatever, down to The USA to talk about your EPA, which is your environmental protection acts. And now he has stripped a lot of that away. In Canada, we have Doug Ford, our premier. You can call him whatever you wanna call him an asshole. He has decided at any time he can just declare an area of special zone where there is no, okay, no environmental,.
Speaker 6 ·
No municipal, and no provincial law. The only law that is gonna be there is federal law. Now, again, no laws. We need to strip the shit out of the land. Mining uses a lot of water, and you should really look into the wastewater of mining and pulp and paper mills and just see what is actually going out in the wastewater, which feeds our rivers and our lakes. Now remember, when the glaciers receded, we were left with all this water that's drinkable. What happens when it becomes not drinkable?
Speaker 6 ·
Okay? Filtration only goes so far. You can buy bottled water because they filter it. What happens when you can't filter it? That's my question one. Question two is, what are we gonna do with all this land that's all ripped up and contaminated all over the place? I will and, again, going back to the article where you say, you're not gonna own anything and just be happy, indigenous people in Canada and in The US have been that way for, what, about a hundred and fifty years? We don't own the reservations.
Speaker 6 ·
Canadian government does. Wait. That's not the Canadian government. You gotta go to king Charles the third. I like doing that because I think of Nash. Okay? We don't own anything here. We don't have no rights. Actually, if you look at our law, we don't even have the right to vote.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. It's it's truly horrific. And, , sadly, Steve, I think that's where they intend to take the rest of the world and then some. And I and again, I'm saying that's where they intend to take the rest of the world. Hopefully, they won't achieve it, but I think that's their intention. And, , it's a lot easier when if you can vaccinate people and, , depopulate them down, you don't have as many to drag kicking and screaming into that intended feature, do you? So yeah. I think it's one coherent plan, and none of it is has good effects.
Speaker 1 ·
But you gotta realize, I believe that the people at the very top of this scheme are literally evil psychopaths. They don't care about the damage that they do to us or the environment or anything because they believe they're entitled to own everything and that we're entitled to own nothing. That's their ethos.
Speaker 0 ·
That's what Of course, the alternative that Adam put forward in his article is the opposite of that. It is you will make nothing and be happy.
Speaker 6 ·
Yeah. And that's exactly indigenous reserves. If you look around, you can find them all up north where or right up to the Arctic. Okay? There's about a thousand people on them. Okay? When mining comes in, you have what's called man camps. Those man camps literally beat and rape indigenous women. Why do they do it? You're freaking remote. You're in the middle of nowhere. Guys miss their wives. They gotta do something about it. And that's really what happens. So, again, we had no rights. We have no laws for us. Again, you look at Canadian law and in our way, sir John a McDonald.
Speaker 6 ·
Went to parliament, and he stated every native will assimilate into this, , society or we're gonna be eliminated. Welcome to Canada. It's.
Speaker 1 ·
So sad, but, , that's such a picture of what has been done repeatedly in history. And, I think they're just getting ready to blow it up on a much bigger scale.
Speaker 0 ·
Right. Canada is the model for everything they would love to do to the world.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. It's so sad. It is it is horrific and, , the only thing we could do is try to not comply. One of the key points of not complying is do not get a digital ID. Don't do it. Try to keep, , your local network strong. Make sure you, , have a local economy where, , where you can buy things from them and they can get things from you so that you're, to the least degree possible, engaged in the system that they want to establish. That's And you will have to make sacrifices.
Speaker 0 ·
To do that during COVID. You couldn't travel or you had to comply with the mandates. So some people just stayed home, others complied. Those who complied, a percentage of them are regretting that decision because of the myriad spectrum of the debilitating issues that the mRNA products cause. So holding to your guns even when it becomes difficult and enduring some hardship, we saw the nurses who refused and were threatened and fired and replaced with immigrants in many cases.
Speaker 0 ·
Years later, they're they're being welcomed back. The military who were kicked out because they refused to comply, they're being welcomed back., you just have to stick to your guns for so long. For example, the REAL ID. They said you have to have the REAL ID to fly. Well, so many people didn't comply and get their REAL ID that now it's you're paying a $40 fine at the airport for not having your real ID handy instead of being refused, permission to travel.
Speaker 1 ·
What I think is funny about that, the $45 fee? Because, , that shows a desperation on their point part because what are they gonna do if you if you decide, well, okay. I'm not gonna pay the fee, and I'm not gonna fly. That hurts the industry. Or if they up the fee to be more punitive to threaten people into getting it, that's just gonna make less people fly and people will choose to drive. Okay? So, , they don't have as much as controls they want you to believe that they do,.
Speaker 1 ·
But you have to be willing, like she said, like Chelsea said, to take a stand. And, , I've refused to fly ever since they started that. I've driven all the way to Texas by myself from Kentucky, , widow, 63, cerebral palsy, this I was like, no. I will not be part of that system. Not doing it. And so, , it cost me time. It cost me to let, being pretty uncomfortable because I get stiff, and it's hard for me to move when I get out of the car. And it, being widowed with my husband being killed by the protocol,.
Speaker 1 ·
It of course, my sons were like, oh, mom, we don't want you to do that. I'm like I'm like, I'm doing it because I'm not gonna be told how and when and where I'm going and how I will travel and how I won't. And it's those little things that allow us to maintain control and to force them to recalculate. And if enough people do it,.
Speaker 6 ·
It does put a thorn in their side. Can I give you guys a flip here on this whole outlook on AI replacing jobs, the one income benefit and all those other crazy stuff? How about we look at it from a different perspective? I'd like I and I would like to make it available to you. I was able to achieve a book from a company, and it's called modern slavery. And it basically gives you a guideline to controlling people. They're your slaves. Okay? So the elite that have money will always have money, and that'll never end. But the people, the rednecks, the guys that are poor like myself,.
Speaker 6 ·
Will always be a commodity to the rich.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. They always have been and they always will be. They just don't think they need as many of us commodities. That's the problem. They want to downsize us and have technology do our jobs. So there's just few of us fewer of us to deal with.? So we'll see how it plays out. But it's good to know your enemy's strategy. It's good to plan, and it's good not to just blindly walk into it or rollover.
Speaker 6 ·
I agree. I'll I'll go quiet in the background now. Sorry. Oh,.
Speaker 1 ·
No need to apologize. We'd love to hear me? Because I don't hear anybody. Okay. Miriam, are you there? I am there. I can hear your protocol. Can you hear me? Yeah. It's just that you suddenly went totally quiet before you hit your mute button, and I was afraid that I'd lost everybody. Oh, no. Sorry. I was just oh, you're fine. I was just sitting around and tell Steve he apologized, and I was like, you don't need to apologize. Dialogue is a great thing. See, this was the problem.
Speaker 1 ·
During the past five years is we were so divided that people stopped talking to each other and having give and take. And that's where also they begin to win when we are so divided that we can't even talk to each other. That's another form of control. So, Steve, don't apologize. We love dialogue here.
Speaker 2 ·
We have to have dialogue. That's the thing that they tried to take from us by telling us what to think, when to think it, where to think it, how to implement it. Yeah. No. We need to have the dialogue every day, all day long.
Speaker 6 ·
Thank you, Steve. Okay. I just I wanna give you guys my perspective on life here. Okay? I re I do research, environmental. I find a lot of neat stuff. Okay? You find that stuff, I'm gonna tell you something. You can lose your life. My brakes have been tampered within my truck. My gas line to my house. Death threats have been made. And this is the reality of life. When you find the elite, and they're making money, and they're making it because they're polluting the environment, and they're doing it because they got the politicians in their back pocket, or our.
Speaker 6 ·
Politicians might be like yours. They might be doing blowies.
Speaker 6 ·
But, anyways, as long as they have the politicians in their pocket, we're screwed.
Speaker 1 ·
Steve, I think you're right on the money as far as all the politicians are essentially the same. There might be one or two little outliers, but, yes, they're all motivated by the same thing inside the same system. And it's good, , while it initially is horrifying when you suddenly realize that, it's still always good to know the truth and face the truth. So yeah.
Speaker 0 ·
I'd just like to take a brief moment to welcome new listeners and invite any of you who would be willing to come up on mic and share your experience with COVID policies, protocols, and mandates. We are here every Saturday evening to share our experiences and commiserate and advocate.
Speaker 0 ·
For accountability for what we believe are crimes against humanity perpetuated on the people of America and the world at large. And we believe that people should be investigated, prosecuted, and be locked away for a very long time for all of the various evils that we are discussing this evening. I believe this should not be limited to the architects.
Speaker 0 ·
And orchestrators of the policies, protocols, and mandates that resulted in so much suffering and death. I think the propagandists need to be held account held to account for what they have done. This week, we saw The Atlantic come out with a piece saying, yes. Children have been killed by the shots that we cheered mandating. They've said that. And the reason they're saying this is because, quote, denying it only serves the aims of the anti vaxxers.
Speaker 0 ·
So they are now after cheering mandating an experimental gene therapy on the entire world. They're now coming out and saying, okay. We can talk about the kids that it killed, but we're only doing so because if we continue to pretend it's not happening, we're playing into the hands of the anti vaxxers. And I think they should be held to account. I've highlighted 20, at least 20 or more pieces that they put out in favor of mandates and persecuting the unvaccinated and, oh, we've had it. Our tolerance with the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0 ·
Are holding us back and all of this. And now they can see that the very mandates they cheered resulted in death, and not just death, but the deaths of children. And if they're acknowledging the deaths of children, there is an avalanche under this tip of the iceberg. And they are just starting to touch on it, but only because continuing to play dumb plays into our hands.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. So just to put a fine point on this, they're more concerned about us evil anti vaxxers. They're more concerned about that than they are about the deaths of children. This tells you about the blackness of their soul and who they are. They care not one wit about anything, but advancing their agenda and neutralizing the, quote, anti vaxxers, end quote. And what that means? They don't want the truth out there, and they care not they wouldn't care if a million kids died.
Speaker 0 ·
And this isn't in hindsight. They're still administering these shots. They're they're they're saying they would they would continue to see more children killed if not for those anti vaxxers.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. Exactly. This is a remorseless organization and body of people. They have zero remorse for what they wrought by pushing this agenda actively and aggressively. They do not care.
Speaker 0 ·
And I have penned just a few of the screenshots to the nest and in the purple pill. The Atlantic has no shame, and their reporters should feel bad. And ultimately, they should be ensnared in the investigations and that there should be some consequence for purveying misinformation while silencing us for speaking the truth under so called misinformation policies. And this killed children while we were trying to save lives.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, if you can be actively prosecuted for killing someone by creating circumstances where they die, I would say that this exactly fits the scenario., and there are laws where you can be prosecuted for manslaughter, where you create those conditions and you kill someone. Well, to me, those are exactly the same conditions. They created the conditions where people didn't know the truth, and they actively pushed the agenda aggressively. So I think that they do have culpability, and I think that they should be able to be charged for that.
Speaker 0 ·
And Adam points out crave and disregard is murder one. So.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And then if two words ever described anything aptly, it would be crave and disregard. It certainly would be.
Speaker 0 ·
And I the whole deal with CARES and PREP Act was that these companies are immune from any liability unless there was deliberate fraud or malfeasance. Isn't that the language? So, I think suppressing the evidence in their own studies that children died in their own studies before they assured us these were safe and effective a 100% constitutes fraud. So prep and cares protection should be out the window.
Speaker 1 ·
It absolutely should as far as the letter of the law. The problem is we have spineless law enforcement officials, spineless legal officials, spineless, justice systems because none of them want to touch it. And why? All the money that flows into their investments, and if it's politicians, into their campaigns, They're all thoroughly corrupted.
Speaker 7 ·
I
Speaker 0 ·
Will point once again to Moderna's SEC filings from, I think it was, 2019, where they lament being in the red and, talk about how if only the red tape around there, what they call investigational medicines, in other words, mRNA gene therapies, could be ameliorated, they would be well in the black and could be raking in money hand over fist. That is penned in the nest, and I will put it in the purple pill right now.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. The dollar is mightier than the sword. The dollar is mightier than almost anything, including what is it? What's the little oh, I can't think of the symbol for just the scales of justice. Yeah. The dollar is mightier than all of that. That profit motive trumps it all.
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, it's just infuriating, isn't it? And in those SEC filings too, they lament that the FDA considers their mRNA platforms gene therapies, which of course is another thing we were censored from saying and had our account suspended from talking about calling them gene therapies after they had been rebranded as, quote, vaccines.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And thus, the redefining of vaccines. Everything they did was with an eye to getting that product to market come hell or high water, because, , billions of dollars were at stake for them.
Speaker 0 ·
Billions and billions and billions of dollars. And that is a drop in the bucket to what these AI behemoth, the tech moguls are looking at with making with AI. But they to do that, because as musk laments, the AI has already consumed all human knowledge that's been digitized to this point, is they need all the data. They need our biometrics are our most valuable asset at this point, which is why you should not, easily give those up.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. It's our one, card that we have to play to withhold from them. Do not give them your data voluntarily. Do not give them your biometric image, your digital image because that they want it. They want it desperately.
Speaker 0 ·
And they're gonna make it tantalizing. It will be almost impossible to resist. And your job at that point will be finding trustworthy intermediaries to provide that benefit or convenience that you think you can't live without when it when it comes to that. Because that's gonna be the real the real test, , moving forward is because everyone's gonna have their own little, what they're doing with AI. And you have to know who's who's operating that, where are they getting their money, who's funding it and why, what are their actual goals. And finding trustworthy.
Speaker 0 ·
Ways to avail yourself of that technology is going to be it'll be difficult, but I think it will be possible as soon as or at least once more people start doing things with it, and it's not all bottlenecked by these three behemoth companies.
Speaker 1 ·
I think so too. And in the interim, my strategy is I'm just not going to plug in, and, I may designate one of my immediate family members to be plugged in if they choose to be because, , some people actually wanna be. And, then, , we can basically use that as the point person to do whatever we need to do online, and then I can be incognito. I think I'm gonna go back to reading my hardback cover books and playing cards and doing cross stitch and shopping locally and just, , just deny them as much as I can,.
Speaker 1 ·
At least for me personally and most of my immediate family here with exception of maybe whoever wants to be the person to be plugged in there a little bit. So, that.
Speaker 1 ·
Minimizes what I'm giving them anyway. That's that's my immediate strategy right now. We'll see. And I've already got you beat, Miriam, because I don't do anything.
Speaker 3 ·
And I'm going kicking and screaming all the way. Yeah. And that's where some of us oldies but goodies happening.
Speaker 1 ·
, that's where some of us oldies but goodies can be some serious warriors here because we I went kicking and screaming in 2013 to a iPhone. My husband was like, you have to get one. I'm like, I do not want an iPhone. Just let me keep my flip phone. I'm perfectly happy with it. So, , that's where our generation, we may be more of a pain in the butt in a good way than anybody else, , because we just we don't like it anyway.
Speaker 0 ·
That did make me think of another important note. As AI, it becomes so intelligent and is weaponized by fraudsters and scammers. I think it's important you set up I know it's it's gonna sound silly, but set a password with your friends and family that you communicate with regularly in case you get a call from them and something seems a little off. Because it's at the level now where and this is happening already in some places. You'll get a call. It sounds like your loved one. They'll claim their, they need x amount of money wired to whatever because of x emergency. And if you.
Speaker 0 ·
If you can't tell the difference,.
Speaker 3 ·
You might be taken in. That's how good they are. They can imitate a voice. And that's been happening for a long time already, Chelsea. So you're right. They're just getting better at it.
Speaker 0 ·
Right. So you just set it, talk to your loved ones offline, , preferably away from your devices so it can't be intercepted. And, just set a word that you can always ask what is this? What is that phrase? What is, , how is the rain in Spain? How does it fall on a plane? And, , you have your answer and whatever it is, have some way to really identify who you're talking to just in case. Have been joined by LX and I see you're already unmuted. I wouldn't point you to the rules and guidelines since you're new, but go ahead.
Speaker 0 ·
Welcome, Alex.
Speaker 4 ·
Sorry. We've spoken before COVID. Sorry, host. What I'd say is the digital ID at the moment, we've got so many issues in The UK. Obviously, this is a heavyweight US panel, so I'll take that into, , understanding on what you understand from what's happening at the moment.
Speaker 4 ·
It's not something I throw around tyranny,.
Speaker 4 ·
Indoctrination at schools, tyranny from our government.
Speaker 4 ·
I sit and I do not vote. I don't have any causation to say, can see that and I want to do this and push as a in party member forwards. The same with you in The US.
Speaker 4 ·
Just not too bad for me. I'll be honest, but I don't live there. I can't say that. What I'd say is what we've got with digital ID, it stripped us back on human rights. And what we've seen is at the moment, the likes of my child, where we are of a framework, which is I'm in my forties, I can turn around and say, oh gosh, not for me. Which I can do that, I can still earn money, I can still pay for properties and this, that, and the other. However, my son at the age of 16, they're bringing something in 2028 that makes him not be able to make a new job. He has to get this over.
Speaker 4 ·
So where Keir Starmer said this isn't mandatory, it's a 100% mandatory. We need to sit up and wake up. And honestly, I need to be careful with my language on this. But this ends the way that room time has ended.
Speaker 4 ·
The mails have been canceled and everything else like that, and we are honestly flailing at this point. We've got a massive problem with immigration, and this is legal and illegal immigration as well. But I know as myself, I have never come across this. What I've come across for me and my daughter in the last four years, we are so fucked, honestly. We are massively.
Speaker 4 ·
Up to our knockout in debt on something that's coming to us at the moment. And.
Speaker 4 ·
What I'd say is I didn't see color or creed. I'm not a racist whatsoever. But there's people who are.
Speaker 4 ·
Extremists
Speaker 4 ·
On certain religions, and they will be the unalive in the people at this point to your world, Mars. And I don't know how to, like, help people stop that, if that makes sense.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. It does. Thank you for sharing that. And I know you had to use certain words, like unaliving and certain Yeah. I'm I can speak on Tok. Certainly. Yeah. What I'm saying. I know exactly what you're saying because we do see what is happening over there. And it is really sad, but that certain religion is well known for its conquest via.
Speaker 1 ·
Population immigration under peaceful guys and then implementing their version of how society should be, and I'm so sorry for you for you guys experiencing that. That is Miriam It's bad. Do for me the kicker is that when we looked at what we took over.
Speaker 4 ·
For Ukraine. Okay? Mhmm. So we actually took I have got the stats off the top of my head, to be honest with me, or the phone's dead. We took a massive amount of women and children. Mhmm. And a lot of these women that came over went on to do OnlyFans and stuff and broke up a lot of homes, but I won't go into that. But we're not seeing the denguees and boats bringing anyone over who is either a minor or female. We are seeing 80 it used to be 81%. It's 85% of fighting gauge males. I think people think that's just a male. That is between 18.
Speaker 4 ·
And, like, 39 or something. This is fucking they're knocking out the ballpark. These people are here, and I can honestly say Liverpool is a city that's built on immigration.
Speaker 4 ·
I've been the ethnic minority. I've lived in Toxteth. I've lived in Hackney in London. I've experienced racism on the other side. And to myself as well at certain points. Liverpool's not one of those cities. We are so seriously for male rape as being knocked out of the ballpark. Like, the children, we can't protect our neck at this point by doing this. And I'm getting called and a racist for saying these things.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I've seen all that, and it is I'm sure what the little bit that we see here in the news is a 100, a thousand times worse, I'm certain. This the last administration tried to do that here as well over our southern border. There were quite a few videos exposed of fighting age males, both from The Middle East and from China that were imported across our southern border. And there were videos showing places in airports where they were housing them, and they had big black curtains put up so that you weren't allowed to look. And the few people who did do videos,.
Speaker 1 ·
They police came and made them leave when they made the videos. So yeah. Yeah. They were starting to employ that same strategy here. So I think that has been somewhat turned around here with the current administration, but I really do feel for you. That is just horrific.
Speaker 4 ·
I think it's ongoing within Western Wales, to be honest. It's just very difficult to try and manage it. And I don't even mean like a Twitter account or anything, but just know legally what you're allowed to say. So Lucy Connolly, I don't know if who she is, but it's it's very boring. It's so cool for me. She got given thirty one months.
Speaker 4 ·
For a tweet, a single tweet that she said. She said, mass deportations now, Sapphire's to those hotels for people.
Speaker 4 ·
I know what these families are going through. Sapphire to the treacherous government for all that care. So basically, she has a child who was unalive, killed by the NHS, sorry, Harry, which was ten years ago. And basically, they honed in on her because she was a Tory, MP's wife,.
Speaker 4 ·
Set her up for thirty one months in jail. So this is last year. She got out in August. And basically, she's, , the poster girl for free speech. She doesn't want that accolades. I'll be honest with you. She's fine about it. She's wants to push, like, reform and wants to go on to more political party and stuff. But this is a woman who's given a single tweet and says, I feel bad. I don't know if of the Southwark girls. There was three people sorry, three young girls who were alive. And.
Speaker 4 ·
This is where we're from. Her mother's from this district and from the area. Were upset about three young girls being killed.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah., a lot of people think that we're being, , excessive and over the top when we warn that you we really need to stand up now before we're so far down that line that a meme puts us in jail. And, , I think that you could really reinforce the fact that does happen, doesn't it? If you leave it and you don't say anything long enough, this is what happens. And it's it's it's something it's important to do the fight now, suffer now versus suffer later., because that's their intention. So yeah.
Speaker 1 ·
But I thank you for sharing that with us because I know that takes a lot of courage on your part because it is, , what you're experiencing in your country is so very oppressive that you've got people who are murdering girls, but yet, , many times they don't really get prosecuted and you put a beam up or you say something about those murders and you end up getting prosecuted. That is absolutely horrific.
Speaker 0 ·
I think Steve wanted to chime in here. Go ahead, Steve.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. Sorry. I was on my phone there looking for something too.
Speaker 6 ·
Alex, you were talking about immigration, both legal and illegal. We I know we have it both in Canada, United States, and UK, and other places. But here's something I want you to consider. And, again, I have the documents. It was done by the UN, and I'm pretty sure everybody that was attached to the UN at that time adopted it. And it is basically replacing population. Okay? Basically, your government is saying, you're not making babies fast enough. Women are not being mothers. They're not raising No. This is this is replacement,.
Speaker 6 ·
Fairy. Like, I understand that a 100%. Exactly. I've got it. Exactly. And that is exactly what it is.
Speaker 4 ·
And kolaji plan as well. I'd say that.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I think that's a coordinated strategy we're seeing in many, many places throughout the world., downsize the current population, make them less fertile, and import a replacement population. And I think that's a real practice from the powers that be. It's sad, but true.
Speaker 0 ·
In those wretched countries where a man cannot call his tongue his own, he can scarce call anything else his own. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech, a thing terrible to public traders. That was cited by Ben Franklin and is archived on foundersarchives.gov. I will I posted that in the purple pill and I will put it momentarily in the nest. That is really what it's all about is subduing our ability to speak our minds and control our own tongues in pursuit of the totalitarian digital enslavement schemes.
Speaker 0 ·
And the rest of what we've been discussing tonight. And we are very lucky here in The United States that we have these founding documents that preserve our unalienable rights not given to us by government, but by God. And our government is supposed to protect and defend those liberties. And they're trying to flip that around and shift those dynamics in favor of I recently saw them on the subject of AI saying, well, , just passing one regulation in one state or one country isn't enough. We have to, there has to be a global regulation for all AI.
Speaker 0 ·
And they would they'll use any, , any crisis they can come up with to say, well, , we have to have this global governance. We have to have these laws, so there's one standard for all. And as, for example, as AI Babelfish become a thing and there are no language barriers between the individuals of every nation, this will become more and more an argument that they seek to push.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And on that note, since you mentioned, , regulating AI, Trump just signed an executive order basically saying that the states are prohibited from regulating AI, all of our states. So he federalized the regulation of AI effectively with his recent in the last few days executive order. And that dovetails perfectly because if you federalize it, then you've got it at a national level, which then can be global then can be global across all nations. So yay.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. Heidi, I'm sorry if, x is giving you problems. Try to get back on mic when you can. We'd love to hear from you tonight. I think we'll go to protocol widow soon or maybe now, for the reading of the names. I'd just like to remind everybody that we are here primarily to hear from you, to hear about yours your stories and your experiences with COVID, crimes against humanity, policies, protocols, mandates, facts, injuries, the deadly censorship, and all the rest of it. So please press the mic in the bottom left hand corner of your screen,.
Speaker 0 ·
And we'll get you up to say a few things. If we if we just continue talking, , we'll probably wrap it up before too long because,.
Speaker 4 ·
, we are currently I'm gonna go host, but what I would say to you is at the moment, we've seen a ramp up in COVID problems where we're looking back on doing masks and stuff like that because we've been labeled as super flu in The UK. And I don't know how much of that over in The US because we're throttled on proper news. So Elon Musk will tell you all day every day, this is the source of news that every country's got. I dig that. It's it's it's true. Unfortunately, what we've got at the moment is super flu. So.
Speaker 4 ·
The BBC and the media are telling us that we've got super flu. A hundred percent, we've got a flu pandemic. Okay? If anyone wants to go back and they can check on my account why we've got a flu pandemic, it's because we've shattered these people after we've pushed this vaccine, the snuff vaccine into people. There was no pandemic whatsoever. We rolled out in The UK on the September.
Speaker 4 ·
I've worked in Liverpool Women's Hospital, I've worked in primary schools and it's something I keep my children off because this is a live vaccine. This is not up for fucking debate. It sheds. So if you if you ask Google, does the flu vaccine shed? Yes, it does. We ramped it up massively. There was no flu issue whatsoever. I can honestly say now, people wanna turn back and say, oh, it doesn't exist. This, that, and the other. There is unvaccinated children who are desperately.
Speaker 4 ·
Sick at the moment
Speaker 4 ·
Because they've been next to people who got fucking these vaccinations. This is the top and bottom of it. There was no problem. Big pharma are creating the problem and creating the cure and we've seen it in Liverpool time and time again. I met a child the day before yesterday and she's been in and out of hospital and she says it was because basically her primary caregiver had been given this inoculation. Honestly, we have to.
Speaker 4 ·
Lock down somewhere between us and make our best in society because it's the math isn't math enough at the moment. People are fucking stupid.
Speaker 1 ·
You are so on point, Alex. That's where we started this space was basically talking about shedding and how that shedding happened. They won't believe it. They will not believe it. Yeah. They don't believe it, but that is exactly what the body will do when you inject something into it. It attempts to eliminate the foreign item that's being put into it, and that's shedding. And,.
Speaker 1 ·
So, yes, they cause the problem with these injections. They don't they're not fixing anything. They're causing the problem, and then they try to tell you that they have a fix for it. My own personal philosophy is I will never have another injection as long as I live, and I also will not darken the doors of a hospital unless I literally am going to die. And I've already, two years ago, I got severe pancreatitis and diverticulitis and was so dehydrated, couldn't eat for three days. Finally called my nurse practitioner friend, and I she agreed to give me IV at home.
Speaker 1 ·
And I taught my son how to do it because I was not about to darken the doors. So that is how I how dedicated I am to avoiding the pharma system because it's it's it's not a solution. It is a problem is what it is. So sorry to hear that.
Speaker 4 ·
Do what? I'm on high doses of prednisolone. I've got colitis. I've got this colitis, and it's hospitalized me twice. So I'm on an uptick at the moment. This is what they did to me, you might die if you don't take this.
Speaker 1 ·
I'm so sorry, that is horrible to have to take the prednisone That's for fine,.
Speaker 4 ·
It's do what it is? It's really unsexy, so I look like I'm a sexy girl. I can shave through the eye of a needle with blood. It's horrible. It's one of them things you've got. And with colitis, I never, like, I always go, oh god, I've got colitis, and people don't understand, you didn't take nutrients from food, this, that and the other, but I'm like, I was one of the first that they brought for under COVID. I'll take this vaccine, do this, that, and you're there. And it wasn't that I knew better. I just asked them, well, is it.
Speaker 4 ·
It time saved? Is it insurance part? Like, it wasn't fucking insurance, and that was the thing for me. I'm not that clever, but I said, like, is there any indemnity or anything? I feel like I'm throwing big pharma a free drug trial. Like, I didn't know. This is, like, 2020. I'm a dumb one and I'm asking these questions. No. There you go. They couldn't answer them. Exactly. They couldn't answer them.
Speaker 1 ·
And that's why they no longer want us to talk to each other, they no longer want us to think for ourselves because if we ask questions, we're gonna discover what they're up to. And kudos to you. I'm so glad that you caught them and you said no. And we just need a lot more of that all over the whole world. People just flat say no, do not cooperate, and we can we can starve them to death by refusing to cooperate, and that's what needs to happen.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. And Robert Strang in Canada, I think, admitted. He said the quiet part out loud where he admitted that they were locking down preventing people from gathering at church or in pubs to prevent the spread of not a virus, but so called misinformation.
Speaker 0 ·
This was, of course, policy all over the world, but I think it was only Strang who kinda let the quiet part slip there that they weren't just locking down. They weren't locking down people at all to stop the spread of a virus. They were actually implementing lockdowns to facilitate this social change of funneling everyone onto moderated platforms and also monitoring everything we say and, oh, wow. The post the post has been.
Speaker 0 ·
I can no longer view the post that I'm always pinning of Robert String saying that. I don't know if the account's been banned. I'll look into that. Okay. With those hosts,.
Speaker 4 ·
Listen to their face. There is a party in England. They are I think they're the third largest party. His name is Ed Davy. He bent on record the day before yesterday on a tweet, and he said that what we need to look at now is masking children, teachers in schools, this, that, and the other or something within that, , whimsical frame. Then he turned around. What was most interesting to me was that he wanted to go and ask for masks and stuff like that. And he is literally one of the only people who has never.
Speaker 4 ·
Said no to any of the lockdowns, anything like that. We've got a massive issue, and now he's saying that he needs to test the children and stuff like that. Like, it's not normal.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep.
Speaker 1 ·
Sounds like he's pretty dedicated to the agenda. Yeah. Wonder what he's gaining. Wonder how much money is going into his pocket. The agenda is agenda '20 30. We've.
Speaker 4 ·
Not had Tories. We've not had anything else. Everyone is WAF owned. They are World Economic Forum owned. These fucking cunts are owned by people think the Rothschilds own these people. They're not owned by the Rothschilds. They are second to these people who sit back on their laurels.
Speaker 4 ·
Do what, I'll dox myself and I'll say that my children actually go to Jewish school. I did this for one of three reasons, educational wise and security wise, it doesn't stand anymore.
Speaker 4 ·
Both of my children are over the age where they can understand what's fed to them. They're not quite happy with the paw.
Speaker 4 ·
I think we need to understand that we are owned by a certain thing, and it's worth at the moment.
Speaker 1 ·
Undoubtedly., many national leaders and politicians are the West glow young global leaders. Justin Trudeau was one of them. One of our former presidents, George Bush was.
Speaker 1 ·
There is and then governor Abbott in Texas, one even one of our governors is World Economic Forum, and there's many, many more. They list them right there. So yeah. And Kanshawab actually bragged about how he had penetrated so many of the government cabinets around the world with his young global leaders. So you're a 100 on point right there, Alex. That is exactly what's happening.
Speaker 4 ·
I think we've got a massive issue at the moment. I think that we've got.
Speaker 4 ·
It wasn't the World Economic Forum WHO looks at lowering the age of consent and stuff like that. I understand that the age of consent is a massive.
Speaker 4 ·
Boiling point when we talk about religions. Take that off the table. Honestly, when we're talking about when we spout boobies and when boys start playing with themselves, this, and the other, we have to negate that. We have to give some primary care and look at that as being 16 and sit with that. It's the likes of the wef who want to lower this. It's the likes of the wef who want to talk about minor attractive people, which are pedophiles by the way, and normalize this fucking language. We are so fucked. I'm not to sound too depressing.
Speaker 4 ·
I'll I'll I'll stop speaking for a bit, but we're so fucked, Miriam, because I don't know if you can see a better future coming through, but I would never bring a child into this world right now and I've got to and I love them daily.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, think as parents, we just grandparents, we have to make sure that we are actively involved with our kids and that we don't allow others to teach our children or shape their minds, we're gonna have to take back of that territory. And it's important that we actually do that. We can't let TV or, electronic devices or public school systems or anyone else be parents to our kids, we have to do that. And that's how we assure the future of that generation. And for far too long, think, , parents have been so.
Speaker 1 ·
Swamped with the modern pace and everything coming at them that it was far too easy to let other people, , teach your kids. And I think that has to be priority now that we teach our kids and we are parents, and we don't let anybody else usurp that authority. And there's there's the fix, I think. So.
Speaker 0 ·
Go ahead, Steve.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. Being parents, first, I'm Genette. I'm feral as fuck. I was tossed out of my house and told not to come home till freaking the street lights come on. My parents never knew where the hell I was. The generations now, you're all holding on to your kids. You have to let them explore the world. You gotta let them make mistakes. You gotta let them grow up, and that includes age of consent. Okay? Anybody touches my granddaughter at 16, I'll collaborate them.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And, , them having a healthy fear of the men in the family is all the same.
Speaker 4 ·
Steve, can I ask? So what so Valsa Explorer, do you have a close off point for that?
Speaker 6 ·
A what? A close off point for age of descent? I honestly think it should be 18.
Speaker 4 ·
And not before that because Oh, okay. I thought you're going lower. Just love comfort. Yeah. No. No. So you're go lower? I can't go lower in my heart. No way. A 100%. Yeah. Thank you.
Speaker 4 ·
Yeah. That's lovely. I think that's how we all feel. And No. When you said you have to explore that, I thought you're gonna say you've gotta go lower than that. I was like, My head fell off.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I, even 18, , my husband was in the military, my late husband, and he even used to say that even at 18,.
Speaker 1 ·
That's why they signed 18 year olds up for the military because even then, they're they're not, they still believe they're immortal, and that's why they end up on the front lines because, , they're not they were more likely to follow orders and think they're immortal. So, , even 18 for me is hard to swallow because I'm not sure they really still know enough to make all their own decisions. But, , I guess if they're gonna have kids be in the military, then they should have those legal rights. But it is tough as a parent,.
Speaker 1 ·
, even if you ground them and teach them everything that to teach them, super hard to let go, isn't it?
Speaker 0 ·
Definitely. Since we have a few minutes, and I'd like to bring in a few more people before we do read the anniversaries of those who have been lost. I'd like to give Adam a chance to talk to Steve about the ideas we talked about earlier, the alternative to the great reset.
Speaker 0 ·
Economic solution, is really digital enslavement masquerading.
Speaker 4 ·
As Host, can I just say it's it's five it's one minute past five here, and I've gotta go to sleep? I feel really disrespectful because you're not talking about people who've lost their lives, but I've got to go to bed, and I'm up with my son about two hours. He's 16, but it will both. So I'm gonna say goodnight, and thank you for having me all.
Speaker 3 ·
Thank you.
Speaker 0 ·
Did I hear that right, Miriam?
Speaker 1 ·
Hear what?
Speaker 1 ·
What'd you hear? Did
Speaker 0 ·
Was there a matter of respect in regard to reading them? Oh, yes. She was just Always respect. Always.
Speaker 4 ·
Respect. I think she was just I'm just gonna yeah. I'm bowing out. No. I'm just gonna bow out because she was speaking about something very revered and stuff like that. I didn't wanna say, like, I was caught enough for that. It's it's, like, two minutes past five, so I've been through I see. I apologize. Okay. Anyway know that we are here every Saturday night, so we'll look forward to seeing you another week, maybe. No. I'm never off to the sunroom, Nuboor. And thank you, ladies. I appreciate you. Madame, I'll give you the follow-up. Thank you.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. And thank you for being here, Alex. I know I lived in Germany for a while, and that five or six hour difference is a killer. So get some rest. Thank you for being here. We'll look forward to seeing you hopefully next week. Thank you, darling. Good night, guys. Night.
Speaker 0 ·
Thanks so much.
Speaker 0 ·
Steve, I see your hand up. I'll let you go ahead, and then I'll let Adam say a few words if you guys wanted to circle back to the economic theory thing.
Speaker 6 ·
Go ahead. My hand was down. My hand was down.
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, okay. That's an artifact of my browser. Okay. For Adam to speak, I'm going to have to mute myself and my speaker. So I'll be relying on my cohost while he's speaking. Go ahead,.
Speaker 7 ·
Well, I Did you mute yet?
Speaker 7 ·
, I didn't really mean to jump in completely unrelated in the middle of the conversation.
Speaker 0 ·
It would be good to bring people in advance of reading the names. Sure. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 7 ·
Completely unrelated topic.
Speaker 0 ·
I do see Laurie's hand up now if you wanna take that first. Yeah. Go on. Go ahead, Lori.
Speaker 5 ·
Sure. Sorry to interrupt. I just have a quick question for Miriam., , after it's been almost four it's been almost four and a half years. And in September, it was, like, about three months ago, , I went to LabCorp. And my antibodies at LabCorp was five point o, which is fairly low because, so how bad how bad do you think that is from the shedding that my antibodies is five point o? I was just I was just curious. I wanted to have your opinion on that.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, , first of all, antibodies are very nonspecific. Are you talking about antibodies to the spike protein, or what are you what are you talking about, antibodies wise?
Speaker 5 ·
Well, that test that doctor Mary Talley Bowen says to take, , for that $69.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. There's a couple different ones. There's a spike protein antibody one, and then there's the to the entire outside of the COVID virus, which is a nucleocapsid antibodies. So all that means is if it's if it's high, then you have antibodies to spike proteins, meaning your immune system is reacting to them and producing an antibody. If it's the nucleic acid, it's reacting to the outer lining of the of the COVID virus itself. And it doesn't really tell you anything except for that your immune system is reacting. Now your spike protein count is a different thing.
Speaker 1 ·
Where they literally can tell how high your spike is. So and, of course, , all of that can vary depending on your exposure.
Speaker 1 ·
For instance, anytime you get exposed to anything, your body makes antibodies to it. And so if you're newly exposed, then you could have a higher account at that time as well. So not really sure how to answer you., if you wanna send me what you have, the report, I could be a little more specific. But, , antibodies are just that. They're your body's immune system response to whatever they're testing for.
Speaker 1 ·
Alright. Thanks. I was just curious because I wish I could answer you more specifically, but if you're if you're able to send me that, there's usually a reference range right there. But, again, that's a snapshot in time. So, if it was from three months ago, your antibodies could be different than now than it even was then. And Mary Talley Boden actually had a scale. And like I was saying, vaccinated people have much higher levels of antibodies to spike than unvaccinated, but almost everyone has some level. And the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1 ·
Ones tended to be way below a thousand, a thousand or less. So but my personal criteria is if I'm not having symptoms,.
Speaker 1 ·
Then, , you could pretty much count on the fact that you are not going to have a very high, count there. So I tend to work operate more on are you symptomatic or not, then get tested, and then track that level over time. And if as that count is going down, your symptoms are also going down, you can pretty much count on the fact that, yeah, the two are correlated. And if you're doing something to particularly lower that count and you're seeing your symptoms go down and the count go down at the same time, you wanna keep doing that. Okay? I'll give you an example.
Speaker 1 ·
There's a doctor named Anita Baxus who writes a substat, and she had to go into the hospital and had to get blood. And, she had done her counts before, and then she did them afterwards. And they were sky high because she had to have blood. And so then she had some very unpleasant symptoms happening after too. So she was able to definitely correlate that increased spike count, to getting the blood. So and she has a preexisting medical condition that she must get blood occasionally, so, it can be an issue. I hope that helps.
Speaker 5 ·
Thank you.
Speaker 0 ·
Okay.
Speaker 0 ·
Protocol widow, I'll put it up to you whether we.
Speaker 0 ·
Go to Adam and Steve to talk about the economic thing we were discussing earlier. Maybe give people a few more minutes to come in, before the reading of the names, or if you'd like to go ahead and do that now and start to wind it down.
Speaker 2 ·
No. We can give it a couple more minutes if Adam and Steve wanted to discuss that.
Speaker 0 ·
Subject. Without further ado, I'm going to mute myself, and Adam's gonna come on and answer or maybe address some of the things that he heard earlier. Go ahead.
Speaker 7 ·
Yeah. Yeah. I'm sorry about before. I was blindsided. Bit of redirect in the conversation, but pretty much so I wrote the article that you were talking about earlier, and I was busy, but I did catch a little bit of the conversation.
Speaker 7 ·
So I heard someone mention, I think it was Steve, that oh, this article that talks about own nothing and be happy. That's terrible. And, yes, I absolutely a 100% agree with that.
Speaker 7 ·
The idea of what I was talking about is that the entire all of the pandemic machinery that they activated from the actual from what we're main topic here, which was, the genocide that carried out and also the economic measures where what they did was they forced everyone out of work. They forced not everyone, but they forced a lot a lot of people out of work and out of business. And that's coincidentally how we ended up, in this spot in the first place. And the same dynamic elsewhere with the mass illegal immigration, with the h one b's. It is all.
Speaker 7 ·
Stress testing the system. But what happens when we have this AI takeover that they are now actively and massively accelerating? Because we see China is already way ahead of us here insofar as automation, insofar as what they've decided to do about the value of human life, which seems to be to treat everybody like ants, frankly. But my.
Speaker 7 ·
Perspective is that we have the same prob we have the problems coming up whether or not. However we come at them, if we, , if the web wins and they get their great reset or whatever other method we come at it, The problem is the same and it is real. That is AI is going to economically replace absolutely everybody. And the newest developments with that under the Trump admin, Firstly, obviously, , they're accelerating that now, and they're trying to ban the states from intervening in it. You can see already there's some newbie stuff going on in Arizona and Virginia.
Speaker 7 ·
That don't want the data centers anymore. But that's only half of what they're doing, accelerating AI. They're also accelerating energy.
Speaker 7 ·
These AIs take so much energy and because of all the green crap over the last forty years, we are light years behind or over forty years ish behind on building energy. So what's happen what's gonna happen is, economically speaking, the marginal cost of both energy and cognition and production, they all go to zero with the scaling of compute and of these iterated nuclear reactors that they're now testing. But the answer to energy scarcity, it was always nuclear power. I had an alternative,.
Speaker 7 ·
, very small scale in the solar thermal system for people to be individually sovereign in their own energy. But as far as the grid scale, it was always gonna be nuclear by orders and orders of magnitude over anything else, whether it's coal, whether it's solar, or any of this other stuff. So that's what they're doing now. They're finally getting ahead of it. But everyone sees the Manhattan Project for AI. What they don't see is the Manhattan Project for nuclear energy.
Speaker 7 ·
That is much more low key at the moment, but nevertheless still moving forward. And they're taking from Musk's iteration design cycle that, he put the Raptor engines through where they will basically just blow them up and build them over and over and over until they got what they wanted. And they're doing the same thing with the reactors except they're using a process that.
Speaker 7 ·
They call it called critical where they simulate a design that is supposed to be perfect to what they see, and they have to get the reactor the reaction exactly even. So for every neutron that split up a splitting atom, it splits precisely one more so you don't get much heat out. You don't get a chain reaction, but you do get a self sustaining reaction. And, I'm getting into the weeds here. But long story short is that everyone ends up being replaced by AI. So, obviously, one of the solutions they put forward is UBI where because, again and then you get met, , questions of fairness.
Speaker 7 ·
They just go and say, alright. Everyone gets a base amount. And we've seen that in communism all throughout history in one form or another. And, obviously, we know it just leads straight to hyperinflation and no one having any incentive to produce and, , produce, go to work. And, the shelves go there. Everyone's got plenty of money, but there is nothing to spend it on. So my alternative, my proposal is that.
Speaker 7 ·
When to do a granule, instead of this top down state control alright. The state has to analyze the economy and try to come up with a figure that won't spike inflation and people will be happy with. And, , they'll go and tax the business or something and raise taxes, and everyone will be mad that way. But my proposal is because you have you have a person doing a job, they're getting paid a certain amount of money, and that certain amount of money that they're earning is a component fraction of.
Speaker 7 ·
Whatever it is that the eventual actual value being output is. If someone is sitting in a computer doing admin work for a car company, then the end value that they're producing in their fraction is that car. So that car gets produced. It sells for as much as it sells for, and that person gets a little bit of the money because they did work the contributor to it. Once we're replaced by robots and AI, the value will still be being produced. So if you can marry that economic unit to what exactly is still being produced and how much this person was contributing to it as is reflected.
Speaker 7 ·
Roughly in what they're paid, then if you've got robots doing the work and producing the value, then you can take that particular person that was replaced by the AI. And you can say to them, hey. We are going to monetize a little bit more of the money supply because the goods that you are producing are still going out into the gross economy. And the gross economy, the only way that you can measure or impact the gross economy is the monetary system. Money represents the whole of everything in the economy from someone on Substack to someone producing car or newspaper, whatever they're doing.
Speaker 7 ·
So once everyone is automated, then all of the value they produce will still be being produced. So monetizing it, expanding the money supply in that case, and doing it person by person, never as a UBI that goes out to everyone, doing it person by person saying, you lost your job because it was automated. So the thing that you produce for the economy is still being produced, then you're going to get some of that value. And the other aspect, of course, is that the robots are replacing us because.
Speaker 7 ·
They do it at least as well and usually better. They're not all there yet. They're not, , they're in a lot of waves yet, but they rapidly are accelerating and they're getting. So we will eventually enter a world where all the capital, all the money in the world and there's actually a Yahoo paper I just gave to you on signal that goes into this. But Yale economists are starting to realize this. Although the think tanks like the work, they've been ahead of it for a long time. They know this is coming, and they've got their plan to deal with it.
Speaker 7 ·
There's they've the mainstream economists are starting to realize that capital is all going to accumulate in whoever controls the compute, whoever controls the AI servers and has the energy to run them. And we're gonna end up with an economy that is in the extreme. And eventually, whether it's years, ten, fifteen years total as every sector adapts as it over time, we are going to end up with an economy with massive amounts of goods and services that, , you can go today. We're in a capitalist country. You look around. You can there's a lot of places you can spend money.
Speaker 7 ·
And they will still be there, except they won't require any people to do them. So the WAF would the WAF plan, the great reset, is that they're perfectly fine with this. They will own the production, and they will own the robots and the AIs, you will earn nothing and you will rent whatever you want and you'll get UBI and you trust them to manage the economy. My alternative is that piecemeal, respecting the laws of supply and demand and capitalism so we don't end up with runaway inflation. My proposal is that one at a time, as people lose their jobs to automation, you monetize.
Speaker 7 ·
The remaining value that they were producing, but still is being produced just no longer by them. And as the whole economy transforms, as it becomes more and more automated, you end up with a growing class of people that end up having being automated out. They have money. They go to the store, and someone that is stacking the shelves at the store because the grocery store is a low margin business, they haven't been automated yet. So until that automation reaches every last corner of the economy, then.
Speaker 7 ·
It will continue to function as normal. The shelves won't go there. You'll have a few people getting well, a lot of people getting a bit of a raw deal for a while. And eventually, as the marginal cost of energy in automation goes to zero because this build out accelerates and nuclear power continues to accelerate and there's orders of magnitude more. It wouldn't take much nuclear power to triple the entire United States electricity supply. Wouldn't take much at all, and they're doing that now. So, that's my proposal. And I think that.
Speaker 7 ·
There's it's one thing to complain about, , complain about the oligarchs and their plans and, resist and say we're not gonna tolerate that. It's also a powerful thing to have an alternative to what is a real problem and reason why with climate change, they made that up. They made climate change up out of cold cloth and fraudulent that. They needed something to say, hey. We need to seize all the power and print all the money and get all the control. They made that up out of whole cloth, and that was BS. And we didn't need a plan for that. This AI ascendancy and the energy.
Speaker 7 ·
Build out that goes with it, that is a real problem. And there are solutions on the table, some more dystopian than others. So I think I think it's this is the best idea that I've heard yet because I've talked I've talked to economists about this. I've talked to policy analysts about this. And the reaction I've gotten is pretty much a complete refusal to even engage with the terms that, oh, we're gonna be taken over by AI or the energy costs are going to sit, fall through the port. It's incomprehensible. It's an incomprehensible situation, and I'm still having those debates.
Speaker 7 ·
But, again, this is this is also why we're looking for feedback on this because it's difficult. Like I said, I don't know if you posted that yellow paper yet. I did. But, , the core of the whole study of economics is the assignment of scarcity and supply and demand. And when, in economic terms, when the supply side suddenly becomes infinitely elastic at zero marginal cost and labor is no longer a factor in the production equation, then you end up without any intervention, owning nothing and being happy.
Speaker 7 ·
So this We won't be happy. Right. Yeah. I don't think anyone's gonna be that happy. So this that is my proposal as I put it. I don't think I was very clear about the mechanism by which that money would, actually make its way. Some people seem to presume that I was talking about a tax or subsidy or, , tax the people that own the robots. Nope. I think it's gross domestic output. When you earn a salary, you can spend it wherever you like. It doesn't matter that you earn that salary building a car.
Speaker 7 ·
You can spend that money on whatever you like. So I think it has to be done in the same way. I think it has to be monetized. And I think that tying it to person by person replacement with automation as it slowly happens across the economy will avoid the runaway inflation that every other such UBI scheme and, such like always run into. And you don't have to go and tax the producers either. The people that own the robots, they keep making their profit and their profitability scales to infinity because the cap the CapEx collapses the cost of robots, cost of automation. It collapses with every,.
Speaker 7 ·
Cycle. Every time you automate it, it gets a little cheaper to do some more automation. And if you're on if you're on compute, then your property potential is infinite. So we keep we keep capitalism. We keep ownership. We don't we don't mess with that at all. Free market is the expression of the human condition, but we have to have a way so that once the labor part is removed from the production equation, that we still have a way, a macroeconomic way, to distribute goods at all because if labor is gone from the production equation, it literally.
Speaker 7 ·
The whole economic system makes no sense. And you've got 10 people who own everything and 8, 000, 000, 000 that have absolutely no path to earning anything no matter what they do.
Speaker 0 ·
So, like And that's when the state exerts their totalitarian.
Speaker 7 ·
Right. And that's when you end up with the dystopia. The state can make you do whatever you they want to make you do to get a tiny start. And that's that's a dystopia.
Speaker 7 ·
So that was
Speaker 7 ·
My perspective. I am going to mute. And, yeah, I'm still looking for feedback on this because, like I said, the policy analysts that I've talked to about it, they have a very hard time even getting their head around the base concept. It is a complete upending of economics as we've known.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay, Adam. I'm no economics person. I apologize. I'm a Matrix IT. I also hold certificates in satellites. I can find the plane. I can tell you where it went and possibly where it's going. I can find the ship. I can give you the bearing, heading, and speed.
Speaker 6 ·
But I cannot fathom my head around universal income for everybody. My company and what it is. In my company, okay, I deal with AI daily. And I have to have people in my company. There's just no way around it. But if AI replace them,.
Speaker 6 ·
I have to say apologies and let them go. And I'm not gonna pay, for them paycheck because they're no longer affiliated with the company. They are not an employee, and they don't represent my company. Hold on. Correct. Now when you get also to data centers, yes, we need energy. Ontario Hydro is building three more small nuclear power plants, but we've had small nuclear power plants out for a long time. They're in submarines. Three out of them are sunk in the Arctic with the cores in it. The United States lost a couple of nuclear submarines.
Speaker 6 ·
And one submarine with two mark 34 nuclear tipped torpedoes still in the tubes. Too deep, can't reach it. But here's my thing. Okay? And I gotta look at the other end of things. You gotta look at both sides. Nuclear energy is not clean. Long Island should have taught you a lesson than that. And submarines, they used liquid mercury reactors, then they switched to, I believe, heavy water. United States has also researched liquid salt reactors, which, by the way, are the safest, and they won't freaking melt down, and cause a Chernobyl and a Fukushima. Again,.
Speaker 6 ·
Two more showing nuclear power is not clean at all. Then what are you gonna do with the nuclear waste? Wait a minute. Let's go back to AI. AI controls a lot of the options already in a nuclear reactor. Humans are there to prevent mistakes in case the machine doesn't do it. Same with airplanes. Airplanes, fighter jets, run on, flight of wire or okay. The computer does 99% of the work and inputs only what the pilot needs. I got a missile coming up my ass. I've already calculated a response ready to go. Okay? That's AI. Now, again,.
Speaker 6 ·
AI is gonna take over a lot of jobs. Yes. But wait a minute. Honda, GM, Ford, Dodge, all changed over their painting booth to robotics. Again, those workers are not receiving a check. That company owns that robotics. That company owns it. Okay? So, therefore, you don't own it. You don't have a share in it. Too bad. Again, my company, I deal with AI. When we do our AI building, it is my company's. If you leave the company, you are no longer employed. Why should I cover benefits?
Speaker 6 ·
You said is already going to pay for health care just the same as the States because there's billions of dollars in it. So, eventually, we're gonna lose our own health care. Now close to me, okay, and, , less than a half a day's drive, I can take you from where I live to a small town that is adjacent to the Great Lakes where we are gonna bury nuclear waste in the North.
Speaker 6 ·
What about drilling fluid?
Speaker 6 ·
All that drilling fluid in the water. Like, you.
Speaker 6 ·
When you take AI to the critical point of trying to let it control your company, make products that are just gonna be popping out there, where are the resources coming from? Okay? Your president already called our economics, and he was from Guelph University down there to tear apart your EPA. We got packer head up here, Doug Ford. He declares specialty zones. Okay? He's already declared it for the ring of fire. No indigenous input. No nothing. And then when I actually look at your proposal and the way it's laid out,.
Speaker 6 ·
It's already it's political, and it's already been played out over decades and decades and thousands and thousands of years. You're gonna have the rich and brightest up there that own the money, that own the company. Okay? And then I'm gonna flip the equation because you gotta look at modern slavery, And I have a book on that. And it is real just like anything else. Okay? And how you get richer right now in this world is they're using hedge funds from using poor people as a commodity. Indigenous and Canada,.
Speaker 6 ·
We have not owned this land since we were taken over, invaded, whatever the hell you wanna say. We welcomed. We got slaughtered. Same as in down The States. You guys have, what, the road of tears? Right? So when you look at the theory of it, you're saying, okay. I'm gonna work, and I'm gonna be painted, but all of a sudden, robotics took over my job. But it's okay. I'm gonna receive a paycheck. Where is it coming from? Who is pouring all that money into that pool to pay people that are doing nothing? If you are doing if you are doing nothing.
Speaker 6 ·
And you are not being productive in society, this is the way society works. If you're not being productive, and you're not a productive person in the society, well, you're not making any money. That's the way it goes. If you can't get educated and learn a new job and move on in life and be productive in life, nobody's paying your way.
Speaker 7 ·
So, yeah, you made a lot of good points, and I think you'd be surprised to learn that I agree with you, actually. You sound like I'm disagreeing. You like I'm saying that people should be paid for, from the company that automated them. And, no, that's not at all what I'm saying. It really goes to that last point that you, brought up there. If a person has been automated out and they're sitting around doing nothing, then where is the money coming from to pay them? That's basically the core of what you're saying. And you're saying, no. It shouldn't come from the company.
Speaker 7 ·
And I think it goes back to the analogy that you brought up of the board and the various car plants that replaced and automated as well. This is not the same. Firstly, this is not the same. The robots yes. The robots that took over the car lines, they didn't do it entirely. They were automating a little bit of the physical work. This is a complete cognitive replacement. And when you pair cognition with that actual robotic automation, then you and you've actually got high level cognition., the bots we've got at the moment, they're not there yet, but they are rapidly absentoding.
Speaker 7 ·
Towards it. And what the difference here the difference, the reason it's not the same as the industrial revolution is that the cognitive replacement. That's our that's our one advantage as human beings over the entire rest of the planet is that we have brains, we have intelligence, we manipulate tools, we have opposable thumbs, and we have and we have intelligence. So when you take away our two the two things that put us on top of the food chain within our own society, you surpass our cognition and you surpass our opposable thumbs. You've got humans that have been made economically.
Speaker 7 ·
Completely superb. And the entire foundation of our economic system, the reason that we don't have revolutions every other day and people can live within the system that has been built up is because we distribute value based on labor. The person does labor. They produce value. They get some of that value. They go and spend money. They can earn things. That's how but the phrase of the, , the distribution of resources, it evokes communist imagery as well. We've got a even distribution. That's not really what I'm getting at.
Speaker 7 ·
What I'm getting at is that you earn the reason that the economy works, that you get money that you can spend without causing hyperinflation or destroying everything is because you contributed labor and your labor produced something of value. What's gonna happen is that the things of value are continue to be continue to be being produced, but you don't need people. People as a whole become unable, completely unable, whether or not they're willing to earn a share of resources by doing labor.
Speaker 7 ·
To produce something because that people just aren't needed. Labor has been removed from the pool. So that goes to the other point that you were saying, which is, well, if I'm a company and I own my bots and I fire someone because I got a new bot, what problem is their future of mine? And you're correct that it is no problem of yours. You invested in the bots. You, , you ran the company. You invested correctly. You took your risk. You own the bots. You get rid of the expense of the worker, then you continue making the profit.
Speaker 7 ·
Exactly. That shouldn't change. That shouldn't change. And we will see that continued upward concentration of money and ownership. But the reason that this proposal is needed is because you are still producing all of these goods. All of these things are being produced. And your example with who is, , sitting around doing nothing, who's paying you to sit around and do nothing because the implied assumption there is because you're not producing anything of value. The core whole core of this is that with the replacement of both physical labor and cognition,.
Speaker 7 ·
That the value is still being produced. And the only way you can abstract it is monetarily. You don't tax anyone. You take goods from the general economy that have been produced by means of monetary system, which represents them all, and you give the person that was replaced a share of the entire economy, not from any one particular place, from all of them. From all of them, automated or not, as they progress towards all being automated.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. I can kinda see what you're talking about, but I'm gonna come back to that.
Speaker 6 ·
I'm gonna ask a simple question, and this should pretty much answer any future questions.
Speaker 6 ·
Who owns the parts that are being produced? Who owns the copyright to them? Who owns the patent? Is it the company or the workers?
Speaker 7 ·
The company.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. So if the company owns it, then why should that company chip in any money into a fund to pay for workers that had been replaced by AI robotics or whatever?
Speaker 7 ·
Did you not hear me? They don't.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. I apologize.
Speaker 0 ·
I think it's
Speaker 7 ·
They don't. Yeah. That's what I'm saying. They don't need we don't need to do that. What they what the company is doing, when you look at it from the macroeconomic perspective, what the company is doing is they are producing goods or services that go out into the world. They sell them out into the world, and they're available people to spend money and consume them. And when people spend money and consume their goods or services, the owner makes a profit. Now I'm not saying that they need to be taxed. They should not be taxed. What I am saying is that the person they automated away to.
Speaker 7 ·
Continue producing those goods at the macro perspective, people will no longer.
Speaker 7 ·
Have any way to put their labor forth to earn any of that value. So you end up with infinite automation and all of these goods and services being produced and a big question mark over who exactly is supposed to buy them and how do people even hope to get how do they hope to have anything because their labor cannot be sold to they cannot use their labor to produce anything of value because the robots are producing it much more efficiently, much faster, much better than they are. And the scales to everything.
Speaker 7 ·
Suddenly, you've got all the goods being produced and nobody to buy them except the other owners. But even them, that's a very small pool. You're not gonna have there's only so many cars one person can buy.
Speaker 1 ·
If I if I may, I think I may clarify this for the audience and for myself. So, basically, what we're saying here is, there's gonna be a huge group of people who can't make money to buy anything. And the way that people profit, no matter who they are, if it's business owners or if it's the leads at the top, is the money makes its way to the top as people buy goods and services. So when the money is concentrated at the top, because all the people who own AI and who produce the robotics or bots that Steve and other business owners buy to automate,.
Speaker 1 ·
You gotta realize the people at the very top are making money off of marketing the bots and the robotics and the AI. So the wealth from that is gonna be concentrated at the top, then the producers who have the bots and the AI robotics.
Speaker 1 ·
Are still going to produce. But the people at the bottom who use their own labor and used to make those products can't buy anything in the economy, so they have no way to buy the products that are being produced. So the only potential buyers are the business owners who have bought the bots. They can buy their own products, or the people at the top who produce the bots and the AI and own the AI can buy said products. So we have a bottleneck.
Speaker 1 ·
From the people at the bottom. So we have two things that happen to the people at the bottom. They either starve to death or die, or there is a fund established at the very top to pay the people at the bottom to consume to buy some of those excess products that are now being produced. Does that help clarify the situation?
Speaker 7 ·
Not exactly. That's not exactly how it is, Marion. You said that a fund is established at the top. My proposal is monetary expansion against the proliferation of goods being produced.
Speaker 1 ·
Okay. And so the so monetary expansion, you mean printing money or making digital money? Printing money. Right. So but in the in the digital system, it would not be printing money if it's digital. It would be just creating that digital currency and providing it to the people at the bottom who now have no way to purchase goods and services cause they cannot market their labor.
Speaker 7 ·
Right. Exactly. That last point is the key. The labor.
Speaker 1 ·
So I think what Steve was not hearing clearly was that he's not going to be taxed or actually money taken from his coffers that he makes on his products. Basically, whoever runs it at the top is going to create a form of money to give to the people at the bottom who are out of jobs.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. I'm hearing it, but, again,.
Speaker 6 ·
Again, I'm not economics, so hear me out for a second.
Speaker 6 ·
I just had it kinda in my head. Give me a pause.
Speaker 1 ·
Sure. Yeah., I that's to me, that's, , not ideal either simply because usually when you hear about quantitative easing where, , any government or any people at the top create more money in any form, you still lower the value of the goods and services.
Speaker 7 ·
Exactly. Yeah. And so Exactly. So the mitigation.
Speaker 7 ·
To that the mitigation to that expansion of the monetary supply and the printing money equals just losing value of money is the expansion of goods and services that are still being produced.
Speaker 1 ·
They have to be they have to be, correlated at the same pace. You can't create so much money that you devalue the services that it's gonna be spent on, or goods. But you also can't have so many goods and less monetary supply, so they have to balance that. Exactly.
Speaker 7 ·
And the way you do that is person by person using the free market signals. When one person is replaced by automation, that person's value was still in the world, but they're no longer capturing it. You expand the monetary supply, give them some of it. Yeah. It's it's a simple,.
Speaker 1 ·
Ratio. But the I think what most people get confused with is they're used to the idea of what our government has done, which is print more and more money to pay their own debt. And that's entirely different because that's not tethered to the amount of things that are produced. Meaning, if you only put enough money out there to balance with the amount that's produced, then the value of those goods don't go up or down exponentially. But the thing is that has to be carefully controlled. And I think that's where the confusion was in this dialogue is we were conflating.
Speaker 1 ·
Our, , government spending make making money out of thin air and not looking at how that money correlated with the amount of goods and services. And, , I understand that because we've been experiencing that and been traumatized that by that for years. That's what inflation is and what deflation is. So.
Speaker 7 ·
Yeah. Printing money is really printing claims on goods. Yeah. Yeah. Is that we've got good being printed from dinner. Okay. I understand this. But here's.
Speaker 6 ·
The thing. If you print too much money and The United States has, you crash your own economy. Now hold on. Hold on. Now in my company, I'm gonna automate something. Okay? So I'm gonna get rid of a bunch of employees. Example, we'll use Ford. We're painting cars. Oh, wait a minute. I need a programmer to program that. I need a technician to fix that. So now the single paint person guy, I just created two high-tech jobs.
Speaker 0 ·
Obviously, you have not opened a istudio.google.com yet because, , I would have believed that until last week too, Steve, but these things are developing quicker than we can even keep our finger on.
Speaker 0 ·
And I understand that. Like I said, Canada Have you opened it? Like, go right now, just like you went and read the article earlier. Open a browser tab and go to aistudio.google.com. I'm sure you already have an account. And just ask it to do literally think of something that would benefit your business that you haven't been able to implement because it's been,.
Speaker 0 ·
Too much. It would be too much to explain or you don't have the coder to hire. Tell it, , just any random thing that would enhance your business and watch it hand you exactly what you need. You're not actually gonna need that programmer. Yep.
Speaker 0 ·
And as a programmer, this impact this cuts me deeply, but, it's also it's exciting to see.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah., I'm sure it does cut you deeply because, honestly, , that is gonna be one of the hardest hit sectors right off the bat because that's one of the one of the easiest things for AI to actually do is to do coding.
Speaker 0 ·
And it's it's just it's amazing. Like, I am it wires everything up. It integrates it with whatever you need integrated with. It gives you a fully functional app that does that thing. We've been having issues off the grid managing our power bank and the controllers and the batteries and everything. He spun up in just a few hours, spun up an application that projects. He just manually input the appliances and the wattage that we're consuming versus what we're bringing in. And it projected.
Speaker 0 ·
It gave us a lot of insight into our power needs that we wouldn't have otherwise had. You need more of that. Yeah. And, , we're always one panel away. We're not actually one panel away. We're, like, six 16 panels away from energy independence here. But we wouldn't have known that without the insights from the tool that he built. We would keep buying one at a time thinking we're, , gonna be independent next week. And so.
Speaker 1 ·
I do wanna just make one little comment. I think that, , Adam's idea has great potential. I think that if they would do it exactly that way, there could be, , a great system where no one would particularly.
Speaker 1 ·
Suffer great consequences from losing their jobs. What I'm concerned about, though, is even if they do it that well and they take his suggestions, I'm concerned that it still can evolve into such a tyrannical system because then the people at the bottom are, like, totally dependent.
Speaker 0 ·
On Right. I think it's what he's put forward is not a permanent solution. No. Because, ultimately, it's it's it's a transitory.
Speaker 1 ·
Thing so that everybody doesn't suffer just as we come on board with these things coming online. And I think that is great because they're gonna do it anyway, and I would I don't want people, , to lose their jobs and suffer like that. That would be horrible. But what I'm worried about is once it's firmly entrenched, it would be very easy for those at the top to go, well, , we don't need you anymore, and we're going to make sure that you do what we say. We're gonna make more money off of more vaccines. And if you don't take the vaccines,.
Speaker 1 ·
We're going to just now cut off that income. And that's what bothers me is that there's way too much concentration of power. Even if the system is stabilized, there's too much concentration of power at the top. So very concerning to me from that standpoint. But, yeah, I think the idea, , they're gonna barrel this in, and they're gonna do it no matter what. I just hope that, , we don't end up in a very powder keg situation where they don't balance monetarily and the goods and services because it could get really ugly really fast.
Speaker 7 ·
Right. Exactly. And that's why I proposed that this be a lifetime benefit. The only condition is that you did actually get auto man, have the fraud checks, but you don't and this is a key point of contention with this, policy woman I've been talking with too, that you don't expand the bureaucracy. You don't allow all these conditions to be applied. It's simple initial fraud check. Was your job automated? Was it not? And you don't expand that bureaucracy. And, , the closest possible way that we can match that expansion of the money supply to the actual goods and services available is.
Speaker 7 ·
Person by person. What were you being paid to produce these goods? That is your economic production. So I don't think there is any better measure that wouldn't involve a bunch of economists and central planners sitting there trying to figure it out and inevitably getting it wrong. Because central planning never works. You've gotta use the free market signals. And I think that if you go by what the person was getting paid, then you've captured their economic contribution,.
Speaker 7 ·
And their economic contribution is still being made by the bot. So it's still out there. It shouldn't be inflationary. It should be deflationary as the bots pick up inefficiency in production over time over and above what the human could do, which is why they got replaced in the first place. And if they can keep that strictly transactional.
Speaker 1 ·
And balanced, , monetarily to goods and services and keep ideology out of it, like, , they don't get to monitor whether you're a liberal or conservative. They don't get to monitor whether or not you've had a vaccine or not. They don't get? But that's that is the thing that concerns me is some megalomaniac at the top.? The left people start to exert control once they have people in this system.
Speaker 1 ·
That are dependent on that balanced system. That's the ultimate endgame that I worry about. But, , not that it's gonna matter whether I worry about it or not. It's gonna be what it's gonna be, but oh, well.
Speaker 0 ·
Exactly, Miriam. And that is exactly why this is relevant even in this space, although we got a little bit into the weeds there. This is the best alternative that I've heard put forward so far Yeah. To the great reset that COVID was pretext to enact. Right.
Speaker 1 ·
Because their great reset is absolutely linked to that tyrannical one health global, , vaccine certificates, ideology, population reduction. If this can be separated from that and kept separate, it's a it's a great solution. But that's the big if. And but and but it does apply, and it's a valid concern because once you get into a closed system like this where the wealth is concentrated at the top, you got the producers in the middle, you got people at the bottom that can be consumers if they have an income, and they're very important actually to keep the system balanced.
Speaker 1 ·
The problem is these megalomaniacs don't think that the people at the bottom are important to keep the system balanced. They think they're useless eaters. So there's the issue. Right?
Speaker 0 ·
That is that is a huge issue. But I what I would like to see happen, best case scenario, if something like this could be adopted for this transitory phase, is that as people are liberated from the grind of their nine to five jobs or whatever you're doing that's soon to be replaced by automation, you focus your energy and attention. We all focus on this problem and together, we solve it. Together, we have lots of time. We have super intelligence at our disposal to help us brainstorm and resolve issues. So long as we're very conscientious.
Speaker 0 ·
About how we use those tools and take any information we get from them with a very large grain of salt as we've discussed, We focus all of our attention for those intermediary years on ensuring that the and, again, this comes back to COVID accountability because how are we gonna do that if all of these crimes against humanity have gone unpunished? So we have to use that opportunity and our time and our awareness to ensure that there's a reckoning around these things and that then we use the momentum from that to ensure policies are put in place that this can never happen again.
Speaker 0 ·
That the digital enslavement control grid that they tried to use COVID to put in place is never brought to realization.
Speaker 1 ·
And you're so right because if you think about it, what that was one of the main factors was it was a two for the system. And when I say that, what is not only were they making money off of people like my husband, , when they took them through the protocol, but they also were eliminating a cost when they took them through the protocol, because they didn't have to pay his retirement. He was 60 years old. Okay? So, again, these are very real concerns relative to COVID crimes against humanity because there was an actual economic.
Speaker 1 ·
Factor here. There was revenues that pharma was making, and there were costs that the government who was funding pharma's making money. There were costs that was eliminated for the government as pharma made money. So, , it worked really well for both of the partners, the public private partnership. It worked extremely well. And I don't think that is a small matter that we need to just, , whistle past there. That's that's a very real thing. And I think that, , in the system that they're talking about bringing, we have to reinforce for the guys at the top,.
Speaker 1 ·
Like Larry Ellison and Sam Altman. Yes. You're bringing AI, and you're bringing innovation for the people who are the producers, people with businesses. But here's the thing.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. You're increasing efficiency. You're gonna make lots more products and all of that, which means when they use your products, AI and bots to make more products, then you're gonna get money. You, Sam, and Larry, you're gonna make money because of the system that you're giving them to use. But still, those products that are produced, somebody has to buy those. So I don't believe there's any such thing as a useless person or worthless person in that economy because the billions of people are the people who will consume those products,.
Speaker 1 ·
And you have to find a way for them to be able to consume it. Otherwise, if you achieve your goal of going down to 500, 000, 000 people, then the people in the middle aren't gonna be able aren't gonna need to make products. There's nobody to consume them. And if the people in the middle don't make the products and don't use your technology, then you at the top don't make money. But it seems like those megalomaniacs cannot see that big picture. What it seems like to me.
Speaker 0 ·
And it's all based around this false premise that there's not enough to go around and, ,, under current standards, that might be the case. But this is so right around the corner if we just stop shooting ourselves in the foot here.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly., if they could see the whole picture instead of looking at humanity as this great hoard that consumes that they have to protect the earth from, if they could realize that's not that doesn't have to be the future. I don't know if they can or not, though, because they themselves are so darkly indoctrinated, I guess. I'll put it that way. With that view of humanity, it's gonna be a real problem, to break them from that or to resist.
Speaker 3 ·
Their plans. We'll see.
Speaker 0 ·
There really is a deep seated self loathing that has been built into, especially, the younger generations, probably starting with the Vietnam War SIOP and, , the subsequent free love movement and all of this, but that's another story for another time. I'll we'll take one more question from Steve and then go to Protocol Widow for the reading of the names. If anyone else would like to share your experience with COVID policies, protocols, or mandates, please press the microphone in the next several minutes, or we will probably be winding it down, shortly after we read the names.
Speaker 0 ·
Steve, go ahead.
Speaker 6 ·
Okay. No. I just wanted to say I was gonna tap out, and, I got the wood stove. I gotta check and get some sleep. But I'm gonna actually pause and listen to the reading. Adam, I'm gonna reread your article again, and just see if I can follow it economically as to what you're saying. I know economically what I wanna do, and I did check out that website. Yes. It could do exactly what I'm doing now. AI is already doing it. I we program in Python. I use Colab or Jupyter Notebooks. I we already use AI, so I really don't know if introducing.
Speaker 6 ·
Another AI would be feasible or take away jobs because I still like the face to face of the programmer. I like I like to know how they program. I wanna know how they think because AI is not gonna think outside the box. When we're looking down from satellite and we're going over a river or land and we wanna know the vegetation, is it healthy, is it not, is it contaminated with heavy metals? What is causing, the plants to be sick? AI is not gonna do that. You need somebody to sit at the desk and go, duh. We gotta think outside the box. I agree completely that we their AI.
Speaker 0 ·
Can't be allowed to just run literally everything, and the quality of what is produced is going to rely, especially at first, heavily on human intervention, iteration, curation, and all of this. In the beginning. In the beginning. But, ultimately, it will learn so quickly and it's already I'm I'm sorry to have to break this here, but already smarter than most people on the planet, it will be able to infer into it, teach itself, and evolve to ultimately be able to do all of those things. And I think, , that is happening and we.
Speaker 0 ·
We need to be able to guide it to ensure that it doesn't lead us down to the same dystopia that they tried to use COVID to enact.
Speaker 7 ·
That is the default state. That is the default state that you were talking about with slavery, with the great reset. If nothing is done at all and we just carry on as is, that is where we go. We go directly into neo feudalism, except the only way to produce value in that world is then eventually to get yourself some robots and some AI and some energy. And if you don't have the capital for that, you'll just add a lot because you can no longer sell your labor to obtain any value. So either have a revolution or go starve under a bridge. That's about the state.
Speaker 0 ·
And we have to if not this solution, we have to come up with other solutions because what they've put forward and what they're trying to implement with stakeholder capitalism and all of the rest of it, it's not in the best interest of humanity. And if we allow it to progress as they envision, what will be left of humanity within ten even ten years? What will be left of humanity? They're saying that within five years, the Internet is going to be 90% AI generated content. Our history books will be rewritten. Our, everything is within their grasp if we allow them to get away with it.
Speaker 0 ·
And, Steve, if you have any follow-up. I'm still seeing your hand.
Speaker 6 ·
Oh, I'm sorry. My hand is actually down. I'm just gonna go quiet and listen to the reading, and I'm gonna do a few things here and prepare for bed.
Speaker 0 ·
Thank you. I really appreciate everyone's patience as we explore this sidetrack topic. But it is again, their end goal with the VaxPass and all of the rest of it, I believe, was digital enslavement of every human being. And, that is just because the COVID crisis is no longer in our face twenty four seven.
Speaker 1 ·
Doesn't mean they have given up that goal, and they are using all their means and so do it. And we need to be aware of that and fight against it with all our might, I think. Yeah. And I just wanna say, guys, there's proof that it's not just a belief, that it's fact that's where they were intending to go. I'll try to find the substack that has the information on the global digital health care certification network and all the information on One World Health, and that was where they were going. And, , networking that into an AI run system is extremely dangerous.
Speaker 1 ·
So it is truly relevant talking about AI and automation and the system as such. It's something to be aware of and be concerned about and hopefully, not ceded to the psychopaths at the top.
Speaker 0 ·
Exactly. And after what they've done, that Bill Gates is still doing interviews and Fauci is still on speaking junkets. And Rachel recently came out to gloat about Remdesivir dust. Did this, you guys? I'm gonna find that right now and post it to the nest. I'm sure you saw it. Oh, I saw it. I went there just an article too the other day about,.
Speaker 3 ·
Again, I don't know my source. Don't ever plug me to a source, but I got the info.
Speaker 3 ·
Fauci was taken into the back of another building. Remember he got he got busted at that one in Oklahoma or somewhere, but it was just recently. Maybe it was down here in Florida. That's why I know about it. But somehow that they snuck him in the back again. Yeah. But this time, no news caught him or anything because I didn't see, they it was just like a report, not a not a visual. But I just thought it was pretty ironic that he's still sneaking in the back.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, he has to. Most people absolutely detest the man for good reason.
Speaker 3 ·
Well, yeah, did his security really get pulled? Do?
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. It did get pulled.
Speaker 3 ·
And Isn't that so sad? Well No. I'm He was.
Speaker 1 ·
Whining about it. I'm getting death threats. My family's what did you think was gonna happen when you appointed yourself the mediator of all things science and said, if you if you question sci if you question sci if you question me, you're questioning science. You're talking about an ego. No wonder people hate him. Yeah.
Speaker 3 ·
I can't believe to be honest, you guys, I can't believe the man's been around at the top there for forty years. I just can't or more. Forty or more. Yeah. That's just wow that somebody didn't, , handle this before because we thought when the AIDS epidemic was when he really got known for being, like, doctor Death,.
Speaker 3 ·
And it's only gotten more, a 100, 000 times worse.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, he, as with the rest of that machine, there's there's never been any reason, any incentive for them to stop doing it because they've gotten rich from it, and they've never had any accountability. So and that's what we're always harping on here, aren't we, Chelsea, about accountability and how important that is because they need to have a reason to not continue to do it. So far, we haven't seen it.
Speaker 0 ·
If there is not accountability, we might as well just sign a blank check and go give them all our biometrics and get our digital ID and sign away our organs tomorrow because that's where they're going with it.
Speaker 0 ·
I have found and penned to the nest and the purple pill former disgraced CDC director, Rochelle Walensky, talking about the when they first got remdesivir and.
Speaker 0 ·
Administering it without informed consent. And she appears gleeful in this video. So if you haven't seen it, watch that. And when you do watch that, remember that in context of the names that protocol widow is about to read for you tonight. Protocol widow, I should have given you more of a lead in. Are you ready?
Speaker 2 ·
I hope so. Can you hear me clearly?
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, you're a little bit choppy.
Speaker 2 ·
Alright. I was starting to hear clicks and I'm thinking, let me.
Speaker 2 ·
Let me re come back in. I'll be back.
Speaker 0 ·
Thank you. I wish I wish, I know Elon has a lot going on with SpaceX and trying to take over the world. But it would be nice if we could get some attention to the technology here on x, formerly Twitter, that is just steadily, as far as I can tell, continually degrading to near unusability, I'm afraid.
Speaker 3 ·
Chelsea, can I add a point before while Sherry's coming back to what you said a minute ago? I just want it on the record that this is one chick. Ain't taking nothing. Ain't doing nothing. No. If y'all can't find me, you're just gonna have to come look because nobody's gonna I'm not doing that. Oh, I'm don't see them. So for the record, it's there.
Speaker 0 ·
I'm not saying that anyone should relinquish their rights and comply with their schemes. I'm just saying that.
Speaker 3 ·
If No. I know what you're saying. I'm just saying I'm just They'll.
Speaker 0 ·
Take it as our consent to keep doing it and more.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. No. I was just making it for the record so y'all knew that I wasn't doing it. Well, on the note of taking things,.
Speaker 1 ·
Rochelle Walensky has the crazy eye look that I think she's on a few too many things of pharma that has that has cognitive impairing effects because this woman has the crazy eye look, and she, I don't know, maybe she's on one too many psychotropics or something.
Speaker 0 ·
And just the describing how they isolated patients and put them on vents and couldn't give consent and so they're giving them this, oh, we got this new remdesivir, we're so happy. We're giving it to them without informed consent. Like it was this whole new world that had opened up to her. That's what it feels like she's describing, and it's ghastly.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah., that's the typical mindset that we're seeing in that they were driving the whole system that they wanted to implement. It's that mindset.? That's why it's so dangerous. It's not, the technology can be a great thing when there's some humanity and altruism, but you've got this megalomaniac psychopathic people like her as part of the system, and it poisons the entire thing. No wonder it's so ghoulish. Look at look at what she's saying. It's crazy. It.
Speaker 0 ·
Really is. And what we know from the hundreds of stories we have documented at chbmp.org is that the protocol she is describing is a protocol of death. That invariably in the stories that I have heard caused incredible suffering and torture and agony and death, not just for the victim, but also for their family who is left to pick up the pieces after they administer these things to the detriment and demise of their patients, their victims, really.
Speaker 1 ·
Speaking of which, and then I'll shut up. I was looking below your post there, and I don't know if anybody read down in that post stream, but her father, Rochelle Walensky, is her father is a con convicted criminal, who was named as defendant in fraud, bribery, kickback schemes of a corporation. So, yeah, they're all fine upstanding people. Are they not?
Speaker 0 ·
Wow. I didn't even know that. But she really grinds my gears because she got up and said, again, with that gleeful look in her eye, she said, and I quote, we have administered these shots to 15, 000, 000 people with no concern for safety. And that's that's an admission. That's that's not a good thing. You had no concern for safety and you put it into all of these people and these people are now suffering all of these various autoimmune and heart conditions and getting shingles and all the rest of it because they decimated people's immune systems with an experimental gene therapy.
Speaker 3 ·
You where are you guys seeing I can't find it. Where is it at? It's up in the in the, nest.
Speaker 0 ·
In the nest and in the purple pill. And in the purple pill, I am threading my responses, so you have to follow.
Speaker 3 ·
From the guidelines all the way to the Okay, Chelsea. You already know you'd lost me. I'll go up top. And if not, you guys can tell me later because I wanna see this chick. Maybe I don't want us tonight. I don't know. She's one sick puppy.
Speaker 0 ·
And let's not forget encouraging pregnant women. The CDC she had the CDC put out a tweet that said, if you're pregnant, you may discuss getting your COVID vaccine with a doctor. But experts say it's not really necessary and it's probably safe for you to just go ahead and get one. And I'll pin that too because you wouldn't believe it if you hadn't seen it. And it's still up. They don't even have the shame to delete it. Oh, no., she was hardcore pushing it to pregnant women as well. All I can say is.
Speaker 1 ·
When retribution comes, divine retribution, it's gonna be a very sad day for her because she has she is ultimately responsible for injuring and killing millions with her actions as a CDC director.
Speaker 0 ·
She I would say every bit as culpable as Fauci, but we know Fauci has been deep in this for decades, killing peep Deborah.
Speaker 3 ·
Birx, and we can go on and on with that.
Speaker 3 ·
I was gonna say something before she started in the names now. I forgot what we had. Sorry.
Speaker 1 ·
Well,
Speaker 3 ·
They're all going to regret it. I promise you. One Oh, yeah. It was it was what you were saying, Miriam, is and this would have been good for protocol coming on. On behalf of all our loved ones, I can't wait till they even get to see accountability because even in I believe in having that even you wanna know that. What? I don't know that you'd wanna come back. I wouldn't. But I'm just saying on behalf of all our loved ones, yes. We want accountability. They deserve accountability,.
Speaker 3 ·
And
Speaker 3 ·
We're gonna get it one way or the other. And if we don't get it and God gives it, they I think they would rather we give it than God give it. Just saying.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I think in reality, as far as what I believe the truth is, they may not believe it. They may not think there's ever gonna be any calendar for them because I think they're pretty godless. But I'll tell you what, if they weren't so godless, they would be shaking in their boots right now because it's not going to be good for them, whether they believe that or not. Their accountability is coming.
Speaker 0 ·
And I have penned to the nest and in the purple pill the video of Walensky saying they have no concern for safety and reassuring pregnant women that this is just fine to go get injected with without talking to their doctor. Which since when? Since when do we tell pregnant women to get an experimental drug without talking to their doctor?
Speaker 3 ·
But this is part of the problem too, Chelsea, is, , when and I hate to keep saying I guess I can't help it because I'm old, so I have to go back to me, but our time. But it was just you just knew when you're pregnant, you don't do those things.
Speaker 3 ·
I don't know why everybody has to be told that now. Yeah. Because They don't take anything when you're pregnant.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, , our anatomy and physiological function as human beings and as pregnant women has not changed. So, I'm pretty sure that the advice that was given to not take anything, my doctor told me, , and I and I knew anyway, don't even take a Tylenol., don't don't drink caffeine. Don't.
Speaker 3 ·
And we had natural childbirth,
Speaker 1 ·
And we lived. And now you've got the exact reverse. They are encouraging women to put experimental gene therapies in their bodies while they're pregnant. It is complete insanity.
Speaker 3 ·
Is what And causing so many of them not to be able to have a natural birth because we're having so many c sections that just is every bit of that is a, when you'd have to do that, you're always putting a patient at risk.
Speaker 3 ·
But they put all these women at risk., so many born babies are not being born natural.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, so many are not even being born. They're dying in utero. Right. There's, , Michelle, used to be Spencer. I can't think what her name is now. She got married. But she was saying they had on average twenty a month of fetal deaths. They call them fetal demises, and that increased by.
Speaker 3 ·
Tenfold to two hundred a month after they started Yeah. I think she even got up to 30, Miriam, at one point., one space I was in or but it was close to 30. Yeah., it's it's absolutely disgusting.
Speaker 1 ·
And to hear her speak, she went to her nurse supervisor and was telling her and she was basically told, we're not gonna talk about this. You're not gonna talk about this. They wanted to put a lid on it, and it is just disgusting when they know that the reason for all of these fetal deaths, these babies being born before they're, , dying in utero is the shots with 100% certainty. And they are looking at the placentas, and the placentas are pale, small.
Speaker 1 ·
, there's not these babies aren't getting blood flow, which is why they're low birth weight. And if you think about that, that makes sense. If the mom is having clotting just like, , people who've had the shots are getting big clots in them, but if the mom is having clotting in the fetal veins and arteries, you're not gonna get blood flow to the baby.
Speaker 1 ·
Or to the placenta. Yes. And if the uterus isn't getting good blood flow because of clotting, then the placenta's gonna shrink and be pale, and the baby's not gonna get blood flow, and the baby's gonna die in utero. So it's not surprising what they've done, but it is evil and disgusting.
Speaker 3 ·
Like Even on the healthy births, I'm gonna tell you, though, and I've had more than one nurse tell me that the cords are so.
Speaker 1 ·
Small. Oh, yeah. They can't even extract stem cells from the cords anymore, and that's big business because they normally take those stem cells for free, and then they sell it. The hospital does to these stem cell companies. So in the process of killing babies in utero, they've also hurt their stem cell business because now they the mom and the placenta, they can't produce stem cells anymore. It's real All us moms.
Speaker 3 ·
Should go on a march about getting paid back all the money they owe us for our own our stem cells that we didn't know. Because, , when I gave birth, I didn't know that's what they were doing with it. I thought it was being destroyed,.
Speaker 1 ·
Because it was, like, long before I was a nurse. Oh, well, you've heard the old phrase never let a good crisis go to waste. Well, they'll never let good medical waste go to waste. They'll they'll find a way to make a profit off of it for sure. Right.
Speaker 3 ·
But, I didn't you didn't think about it really back then. I didn't. Yep. That's what they were doing with it., now everything I've learned I've I've learned even since I've been out of, retired in nursing, these last five years, I can't tell you the amount of things I've learned. That is just crazy.
Speaker 1 ·
Crazy. Well, , that's the whole basis for the abortion business too. It's not about caring about a woman. It's about the No. Body parts that they're gonna be able to farm out. Yes. That's what that is. It's a for profit business based on baby body parts. That's exactly what that is.
Speaker 0 ·
Mhmm. Oh, it's the it's it's so gross. And there's videos of, Planned Parenthood operatives talking about how, oh, people would think I'm I'm evil if they could hear me not realizing they were being recorded talking about, , parting out babies.
Speaker 1 ·
It's just terrible. Oh, yeah., that was Veritas, Project Veritas that caught him on video saying those things, and they admitted the truth. It is a for profit baby part business.
Speaker 3 ·
On somebody's podcast this week too, they were saying.
Speaker 3 ·
That because, , they've cut, they got down so hard on immigration and all this stuff that some of the, like, they were saying they're cleaning up these homeless, but, like, some of these homeless people are being picked up and never to return.
Speaker 3 ·
So that was an interesting little thought.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. It makes you wonder if the if the organ harvesters have had too much attention, then they're Exactly your point right there. That was it. That was the point. Yep. They're gonna shift their procurement to a different population potentially.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I hate to think that way, but, unfortunately, that's the world we live in, isn't it?
Speaker 0 ·
Very unfortunately. And it has to stop. They're they're devaluing life to the point they want to treat the elderly like they treat aborted.
Speaker 0 ·
Babies and infirm and the disabled. You might be disabled, but you have a perfectly good liver that my rich uncle could really use.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly. And this is the nexus of this space. It's all crimes against humanity and, , the COVID related crimes are no different. Crimes against humanity. It's it's the for profit motive for the people who are at the power top of the power pyramid.? They wanna make more money and have less of us taking resources away from the money that they can make. And it's it that's exactly what the calculus comes down to, and it's it's about power and money, sadly enough.
Speaker 0 ·
And what we saw with the protocols and what they did, we were talking briefly about Molinsky coercing pregnant women to get the shots. They.
Speaker 0 ·
When if, god forbid, a woman was admitted to the hospital with a so called COVID diagnosis, they would hold that over the victim and coerce them to get their get up to date with all the vax and boosters before they would even be allowed to see their child. And worse stories that I can't even bring myself to talk about most times.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, , we have actual cases of where women went in, gave birth to the baby, but because they had COVID, they wouldn't want them to see the child even. You have separated mother and baby. It's absolutely disgusting.
Speaker 0 ·
And that will have lifelong impacts.
Speaker 1 ·
Yes. And, , it absolutely makes no sense because that baby was just in utero, and your blood is communicating with their blood. And because they're born, you're going to separate the child from the per person that their the blood is commingled across the placenta. Really?, how dumb is that you think you have to separate them? I don't get it.
Speaker 0 ·
And then back to the shedding exposure through breastfeeding that they denied until very recently, They seem to be acknowledging it, but they're, of course, they're downplaying the impact of it.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, yeah., the pure just lack of.
Speaker 1 ·
Common sense combined with evil motives just boggles the mind when you start thinking back through all of the things that you've seen over the last five years. And now people seem to want to just move on and memory hole it. And I'm not willing to let that happen and I know nobody else is here either.
Speaker 0 ·
And what you're about to hear from Protocol Widow is the very real, very human cost of all of the things that we've been discussing tonight. And as she reads these names,.
Speaker 0 ·
Keep in mind that these families have documented their stories with us, and they want nothing more than to raise awareness about what was done to them to prevent it from happening to others. All of these stories are on CHBMP, and we encourage you to visit the page. I'll pin to the nest momentarily where you can view the full list of anniversaries through the next thirty days. Protocol widow will only be addressing the next week. Protocol widow, whenever you're ready.
Speaker 2 ·
Is my sound better now?
Speaker 0 ·
Much better. Crystal clear.
Speaker 2 ·
Okay.
Speaker 2 ·
So for anybody who is new to this space or for folks that might listen to this later because Chelsea will be posting this on the CHBMP Substack and on Spotify.
Speaker 2 ·
The COVID nineteen humanity betrayal memory project has been accumulating, unfortunately. The stories of the victims of the COVID nineteen.
Speaker 2 ·
Not really the COVID nineteen. It's the war on the people in the name of COVID nineteen. So the victims that you whose names you'll hear tonight could be victims that passed in hospitals due to protocols, not COVID nineteen, or they could be victims who passed.
Speaker 2 ·
Because of the vaccine. There are some survivors and other atrocities that are documented on the site. However, if the victim did survive, they are not included in this list because this is the memorial list for the dead. So we're doing the list from December 13.
Speaker 2 ·
Through December 19.
Speaker 2 ·
And please try to remember. These are the families that looked at everything that happened to their loved one and went,.
Speaker 2 ·
This wasn't normal. And they did their own investigation and figured out some of the things that were wrong. And by now, I'm sure they know a lot more than what they did when they gave these stories. And that should actually give you chills to think about it.
Speaker 2 ·
Greg Adelman was killed on 12/13/2021. His story was told by his wife, Laura Adelman. William Peegler Junior was killed on 12/13/2021. His story was told by his wife, Evelyn Peegler. Jeffrey Marshall was killed on 12/13/2021. His story was told by his wife, Diane Marshall.
Speaker 2 ·
Tim Baker was killed on 12/13/2021. His story was told by his wife, Cheryl, daughter, Brooklyn, and son, Hayden Baker.
Speaker 2 ·
Barbara Loney was killed on 12/14/2021. Her story was told by her daughter, Chrissy Bedinger, and sister, Sandy Kreisel. Linda Wilson was killed on 12/14/2021. Her story was told by her daughter, Dawn Wilson. Jessica Halgren was killed on 12/14/2021. Her story was told by her mother, Julie Schlip. Tommy Prater junior was killed on 12/15/2020. His story was told by his wife, Dolores Prater.
Speaker 2 ·
Kathleen Schwab was killed on 12/15/2021. Her story was told by her daughter, Tracy Brown. Raymond Delworth was killed on 12/15/2021. His story was told by his daughter, Emily Delworth. Douglas Morris was killed on 12/17/2020. His story was told by his wife, Brenda Morris. Craig Choudon was killed on 12/17/2020. His story was told by his wife, Vanessa Tilley. William McCallum was killed on 12/17/2021. His story was told by his wife, Diane McCallum. Emily Scott was killed on 12/17/2021. Her story was told by her mother, Sherry Smith. Robert Smith was killed on 12/18/2021.
Speaker 2 ·
His story was told by his daughter, Misty Belsky. David Nimmo was killed on 12/18/2021. His story was told by his wife, Diana Farnsworth.
Speaker 2 ·
Larry Gilliland was killed on 12/19/2020. His story was told by his wife, Ellen Gilliland. Carol Greenberg was killed on 12/19/2020. Her story was told by her daughter, Vicky Greenberg. Philip Thomas was killed on 12/19/2021. His story was told by his wife, Lisa Thomas. Edward Smith was killed on 12/19/2021. His story was told by his wife, Sherry Smith. Lisa Rice was killed on 12/19/2021. Her story was told by her husband, Tim Rice. The members of the COVID nineteen humanity betrayal memory project want to extend our deepest sympathies to all of our families for these horrific crimes.
Speaker 2 ·
And I wanna thank all of you for hanging on to honor these folks because they need to be remembered in the democide of America under the name of COVID.
Speaker 0 ·
Amen. Thank you so much for that.
Speaker 0 ·
It always
Speaker 0 ·
Not always because sometimes it wasn't the dark winter of suffering and death, but when the list is so long, it does it I think it forces you to give pause and realize something was very wrong.
Speaker 3 ·
So many. There was several on that list that, We know. Some of us that, yeah, know really well. That was wow.
Speaker 2 ·
Right.
Speaker 2 ·
It
Speaker 3 ·
Or we're forced to get to know and thank god what? It was nothing that any of us were looking, wanting to do, but it just blows my mind that.
Speaker 3 ·
We became this. It's so what? It's I don't know how to put it into words, but what I'm trying to say, I hope. Well, we've.
Speaker 2 ·
Become a community
Speaker 2 ·
That stretches across The United States and through the space that we're on right now. We are also connected with other countries.
Speaker 2 ·
We talk, of course, because America is where we live. We talk about what's happened here and how to try to deal with it. However, we also have to remind ourselves, and we have a tendency to do it pretty good, but we need to remember to tell everybody. This was a democide that was all of Western nations.
Speaker 2 ·
The hierarchy above us led by the intelligence service services.
Speaker 2 ·
Were meeting for decades, doing tabletop exercises, preparing for the next big pandemic.
Speaker 0 ·
And
Speaker 2 ·
I ought to I ought to put a link in here.
Speaker 2 ·
For some of you who may not have seen this. There is a little short video somebody clipped out of, an RFK junior speech that he gave on 09/04/2021. And the thing that struck me, I had recorded it, got it ready to post where I could find it quickly,.
Speaker 2 ·
And I was relistening to it. And as he talked about event two zero one, which was put together, managed, coordinated, organized, and run by our CIA.
Speaker 2 ·
And he talked about the techniques of MK Ultra.
Speaker 2 ·
And he talked about what MK I believe I heard this from him because I know I've heard it recently. You start getting into some deep stuff sometimes. The MK Ultra was a program called.
Speaker 2 ·
I almost said marathon, but it's Monarch. Monarch became m MK Ultra, and they used isolation as one of the tools that they would.
Speaker 2 ·
Use on the people that they pushed their mind control on for MKUltra. Isolation was the first thing to be done to patients entering hospitals.
Speaker 2 ·
While these patients were at their most helpless for multiple reasons, usually because they had been sent away from the hospital. They would go in. They're sick. The hospital would send them home, come back when you turn blue or you can't breathe at all. So they come back, and they are trapped. They have no other options because the hospital can deliver oxygen to them. They have no choice. They are taking the most vulnerable after our babies, and they isolate them. They insult and verbally abuse most of the time, sometimes physically abuse the family members.
Speaker 2 ·
As they force them out of the hospital under the threat of arrest, under the threat of trespass. Because if they trespass the family member, the family member isn't even allowed on the hospital campus at all.
Speaker 2 ·
And then the ill person who can't breathe, maybe they have a fever, they're now isolated. They're having a hard time communicating because of the mask. Usually, they're wearing a mask after a period of time, and they're having a hard time communicating with people who are wearing multiple masks and or a shield or some thing over their face. They are now also in a room with the tubes to their IVs.
Speaker 2 ·
Running across the floor and outside the room where the tree of all of the medications is kept outside the room. And the nurses and the doctors, in many cases, it's reported that the doctors wouldn't would stand in the doorway. They wouldn't even come in. They never touched the patient. They never listened to the breathing. They never listened to the heart. They those chicken shits would send the nurses in with an iPad and ask questions from the doorway. The nurses were told not to use so much PPE.
Speaker 2 ·
And then they so they wouldn't go into the room unless they had to because every time they went into a room, all that PPE had to be left in the room.
Speaker 2 ·
So that meant for every room they went into, they had to change every time, and that's more PPE, and we can't be doing that.
Speaker 3 ·
And then Can I add something there for a second? Sure. And then be told all that time that you can't come in until they needed you to take them off life support. Exactly.
Speaker 2 ·
And then it didn't matter. That's right. That's exactly what happened. But they also the other thing they did was I've been told by nurses, and I'm sure Deb's gonna speak up, maybe Miriam. If you have bacterial pneumonia,.
Speaker 2 ·
They'd never reduced the amount of fluids you were allowed to have. Because as you were growing up, mama always said when you got a fever, drink plenty of fluids.
Speaker 2 ·
For COVID patients, we like to keep them on the dry side.
Speaker 3 ·
You're you're very correct on that, but we both know why they wanted to keep them on the dry side. Yep. Because they were going to a ventilator. Yep.
Speaker 2 ·
We have to keep them on the dry side because they can't have something in their stomach if we're gonna shove a tube down their throat. They might throw up, aspirate, create more problems with pneumonia. They didn't. For all of this appearance of caring, I don't see it. I just don't. The.
Speaker 3 ·
Sad part, Sherry, is that there's many ways.
Speaker 3 ·
There's actual ways to consist, make hard things consist, a thinner consistent or liquids that they're afraid they're gonna aspirate a thicker consistent. We had all of those things at our mean, I wasn't in that, but, when in nursing Mhmm. At our disposal. Nothing that and when you were talking about the docs, and a lot of I know I know on Jeff's records, it was phone calls that he, , they were doing an, literally, they're writing, call patient on the phone,.
Speaker 3 ·
Assessing him. Patient did not answer but understands all thing, every everything that we did or said. Did you just hear what I just said? That is literally what it says. Yeah. They would they would sit outside the room.
Speaker 2 ·
In Deborah's case in that hospital and call the patient on the phone. Who didn't answer. And then they would just say, well, the patient understood, though. Understood what?
Speaker 3 ·
They were, you're you're charting that you listen to lungs and blah on a phone. Yes.
Speaker 3 ·
Super. And getting paid for that, but a lot of money for each Oh, yeah. If people realize that and especially in the ICU, so they're in and out in, they'll pop in because every time they pop in, it's like a lawyer.? They get paid by the fifteen minutes.
Speaker 2 ·
And they document those minutes by the way. I'm right. They told you. Every time, they documented how many minutes they spent with that patient. Trust me. Because those minutes add up. And then they don't feed them because, , you might aspirate that also. Patients have been have documented themselves, the ones that survived, forgoing ten, twelve days with no food.
Speaker 2 ·
Because we might have to. We're gonna ventilate you. We need to ventilate you. And they're arguing, I don't need to be ventilated. I can still speak.
Speaker 2 ·
And then there's the remdesivir. I don't want remdesivir. Guess what was hanging on that pole in the morning? Because while you're asleep, they hang it anyway.
Speaker 3 ·
And there, again, most of them I know because I know for a fact that Jeff has told us because that when he told me that he, I literally really thought he was getting an antibiotic, which he was referring to remdesivir as the antibiotic. So they were being lied to. Mhmm. And they were being told things that they would, recognize and understand for what, you gotta remember when you're not breathing, your oxygen's that low, your head's not working. Right.
Speaker 2 ·
You might as well be talking to a drunk.
Speaker 3 ·
Right.
Speaker 2 ·
And maybe and in many cases, this was the weird part. You'll you'll hear sometimes happy hypoxia when it comes to describing a COVID patient. Because regardless of the fact that their oxygen might be in the sixties or seventies, they can't make decisions for themselves. That's literally not possible. However, their vital signs are all decent, and they are trying to carry on a conversation. Doctor McCullough and doctor Boden have both documented that they were able to help patients who were in their low seventies, and they got them back on their feet. They got them treated.
Speaker 2 ·
They never entered the hospital. They didn't have any permanent lung damage, and that's what they referred to it as happy hypoxia because the patients, although they're breathing very fast, they're really not stressed. But we have I say we. Chelsea built that site from the ground up. It's a platform. And in that platform, you will find numerous people who point out that they their when they get their loved ones' records, the ventilator was applied, and they were still at 8590% room air or not room air, but air, oxygen. And that's from the blood gas. That's from the sensor.
Speaker 2 ·
They're getting their oxygen monitored, and they are at 90%, sometimes 85%. But let's remember, while everybody is going, oh my god. It's so low. What was this patient's breathing like before they got sick? How many of them had a baseline for when they were quote unquote healthy? That is another thing that was never taken into account. None of these patients some of these patients were forced to stop taking their regular maintenance medications. Whether it was heart or blood pressure, everything was changed. Things were taken away from them.
Speaker 0 ·
Especially if you were getting HCQ or ivermectin.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. Well or in some cases, prostate medications. Because guess what, boys and girls? There's a prostate medication, and unfortunately, I'm blanking on it. Steven was on it. The year before, Steven was on it, had some terrible side effects for him, and he went with a more natural stuff that his doctor actually used himself and recommended. And that and it was fine. He was work it had worked out fine, but that particular medication I wish I could remember where it was. But that particular medication was actually employed by the FLCCC at one point in some patients.
Speaker 2 ·
And that was something that he had not been on for about eight months prior to getting sick, quote, unquote. So then One That wouldn't have been Flomax, would it? No. It was a different name. But, I think he was on that. Because he was on two different prostate medications, and it was one of them that caused that problem, the problems. One of the things that the other thing that you guys may not be familiar with because, , some of this stuff has side effects like remdesivir. It makes it hard for you to breathe.
Speaker 2 ·
Precedex makes it hard for you to breathe.
Speaker 0 ·
Morphine. Especially when you give it with morphine and Xanax on top.
Speaker 2 ·
Yep. All these things were layered. Layered sedatives were given to all of these patients, and they were bonused for that.
Speaker 3 ·
And their saddest lie was to give the lungs a I've I've been a nurse a long time, and we didn't go around going, we're we're gonna bench you to give your lungs a rest. Yeah. That made no sense to me because you're over inflating a set of lungs. It's like a balloon.
Speaker 2 ·
What do you mean you're resting the lungs? No. What you're doing And you already automatically.
Speaker 3 ·
Know you're gonna cause a gas exchange. That's why they don't want, , like, to keep people on them because it causes such a gas exchange problem. Right. Not that they didn't have one before they applied this tube down their throat.
Speaker 2 ·
Right. A number of patients who were injured in the application of that tube, Roland's brother was he died, one of the nurses on his staff came to the funeral home to tell Roland that your brother should not have been should not be dead. The doctor who vented him was had never ventilated a patient before and was so eager to vent him, he googled the procedure and did it from Google and destroyed your brother's throat, and he bled to death.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. Sherry, , that right there just that case right there, you just used Roland's case, that is so Egregious. Take COVID out of it. What? If you that is so against all medical procedure.
Speaker 3 ·
Oh
Speaker 2 ·
My god. And then there's the an absolute fact. In some hospital systems, there were specialty teams who went from hospital to hospital to do ventilation specifically. So they'd roll in there because the patient in 03/13 needed to be ventilated. They already knew where they were going when they got there. They get that done, they look around and go, you got anybody else you need us to do while we're here? So that's why you would get a call in the middle of the night because your loved one needed to be ventilated, not because they needed to be ventilated,.
Speaker 2 ·
But because the team's here. And let me explain to you, You got a patient on a ventilator. They're unconscious and they're paralyzed in every case, and that means that they can't be buzzing the nurse to give them a drink. They can't be buzzing the nurse because they need a pillow. They will be quiet. And that gives the nurses more time to go out and learn a new dance routine.
Speaker 3 ·
, Sherry, too, this is one thing wait. I don't know why it's been on my brain, but I have not been able to get this out of my head.
Speaker 3 ·
The few times that I got to talk to Jeff, when he had somebody in the room before he, , before he went into isolation,.
Speaker 3 ·
There would always be a psychosis of that patient going on.? And being a nurse, I've seen that, so I wasn't thinking anything of it, , like being but now after all this, realizing that each person that went to that stage was going that they went to the ICU. They didn't come out. What? Yes. But and Jeff is even when he wasn't in a very good state of like, I knew he was going to that next step. What I'm saying? But for some reason, I just cannot because I would hear the people, and I'm thinking myself, like, woah.? Like, what's going on?
Speaker 3 ·
But it was all so many people went through that, and it just blows my mind that because they literally were going through a psychosis.
Speaker 2 ·
Mhmm.
Speaker 3 ·
And you they would end up in the ICU and been there. Yeah. And there you are,.
Speaker 2 ·
Couple hours away, on the telephone, recognizing what you hear.
Speaker 2 ·
And totally unable to be of any assistance knowing that your husband is listening to it too. Yeah.
Speaker 3 ·
, he would be, he'd be kinda like, I don't know any other name or whatever, but what I'm saying? Like, I don't know what's I don't know. Harry's kinda losing it over there. But now that I after thinking about because he was like, went through about three two three people, I think, before he ended up nice., before I never heard from him again. And you're talking about in two day. I'm talking about within a I only talked to Jeff maybe two, three times, , day during out throughout the day, I'm talking about, to where.
Speaker 3 ·
Then their emergency, and I never talked to them again. So it was real early in. But I just I can hear the I can hear the I'm I'm almost being haunted by the people in the room because I can hear them, what they were going through.? Does it make sense, what I'm saying? Yeah. To me, it does.,.
Speaker 2 ·
, we don't know in some cases, and we don't know anything about their families and what they've gone to the trouble of locating, , the ones that you heard in this case. But, , you've got people who are short of oxygen, so they're already hypoxic. You've got people who are dehydrated and starved, and we don't know what that's done to their electrolytes or any of the other systems in their bodies. We don't know whether or not they're possibly not getting the medications that they're accustomed to. My husband was on Synthroid. They changed it.
Speaker 2 ·
To whatever the generic is. Can't even remember it now. And, , I know for a fact that his body never assimilated that generic.
Speaker 3 ·
I often And can I just tell you, I guarantee you if they weren't giving them water, once your MPO, which is nothing by mouth Yep? You're not getting no medication but through a tube or a shot. And a lot of those medications don't come in shots.
Speaker 2 ·
Right. And now in his case, they apparently let him have a sip of water, but every time that I was able to understand him and talk to him on the phone, I kept hearing water. Can I get some water?? Because he had to have a nurse there. I couldn't talk to him and understand him. There was always a nurse there because somebody had to tell me what he was saying. I could not understand him with a BiPAP on. And what we've learned from survivors.
Speaker 0 ·
Is that they would put water just out of reach. So it's there. They've provided it. But good luck getting to it in your sedated prone state.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, or they would be on a bed that had an alarm. If they got up, the alarm would go off and then there would be a nurse in there raging because you can't leave the bed., this is the person who is, to their knowledge, can still, visit the bathroom by themselves. That became another fight is getting making sure that they got catheterized, in some case, a rectal tube. And, , it the entire ventilator system situation, we've got two that I have spoken to myself, survivors,.
Speaker 2 ·
Who were put on the ventilator. Both of them had their laptops with them and were working from the hospital bed and were forced onto the ventilator to they just walked in and took the back the laptops away from them, and they went back after they were released and looked over all their work. If they were so sick that they could not breathe and needed a ventilator, their work product would have been crap, and both of them are adamant. Their work was perfect. And one of those guys was doing tax returns for his customers. So if he screwed up, it would have been ugly.
Speaker 2 ·
And he said, nope. Everything was perfectly fine. I went over everything I did while I was in the hospital.
Speaker 2 ·
But once that patient was ventilated, depending on the hospital, depending on the hospital system, that's when the family might be allowed in. And, again, depending on the hospital and depending on the hospital system, you might get lucky enough to be in the room with that patient, but the majority of the visitors had to stand outside that class window and just look at a patient who had no idea they were there. They would sometimes get them to, , put the phone up to their ears so I can talk to them, and they can hear me.
Speaker 2 ·
And I can see them while they hear me even though they can't get a response because they're always paralyzed and they're always unconscious.
Speaker 0 ·
Mister Reptoine, I appreciate your patience. Welcome to the conversation. How are you doing tonight?
Speaker 0 ·
We can circle back. I just wanna be sure everyone who wants to share something with us tonight has an opportunity.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. I didn't I didn't see that person. So I didn't see that person at all. It's not even appearing on my.
Speaker 0 ·
Oh, do you not see mister globe destroyer.
Speaker 2 ·
Or the globe Oh, that one. Okay. Yes. I do see globe destroyer. I didn't recognize the name you called him.
Speaker 0 ·
So whenever you're ready, globe destroyer. Come on, Mike. No pressure.
Speaker 0 ·
And I didn't
Speaker 3 ·
Last job we're waiting for him. I was just mad to share, like, with Jeff. But when he first went in, when I finally, when he got through the stuff and finally got a noose, That's the only time that I literally was in charge when I and I made them get him up for those couple of meals. So I actually saw.
Speaker 3 ·
Him sitting up. He wasn't eating, and they weren't helping, but he was up. Because I was like, there, there's no way with a respiratory infection are you going to get better laying just laying in bed and not doing.
Speaker 3 ·
Breathing, exercise, , the whole spirometer thing? And? So I forced that.? I think that I pissed them right off at that point. But, , they didn't know I was a nurse really either. I didn't give that., I'm I know it's on his chart, so they would've known that way. But, , I literally told him. I said, no. He you're getting him out of bed. He's going to you're not you're not just laying there. But, , like I said, that was that was, like, my end goal. But.
Speaker 3 ·
That was a big deal., if they would've got these even as even with any of their breathing issues, just got them out of bed and the movement and made their lungs work, we'd had could have had a lot of big different outcome.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, the other thing that they didn't get was a proper respiratory treatment. And that was the government that created that.
Speaker 2 ·
Budesonide is obviously the, item of choice. And if they had gotten budesonide, even without ivermectin, even without hydroxychloroquine, it would have because the major driving factor for the majority of patients who ended up in the hospital was breathing issues. And if they had used budesonide, which for anybody who is not aware, that is kept in the NICU. It is there for the preemie babies, so don't let anybody stand there and tell you, well, they can't just give them anything. You never know if it's gonna be more dangerous. I think that we can be pretty safe.
Speaker 2 ·
With the medication they use for the NICU babies.
Speaker 3 ·
But what blows my mind with Asher was their excuse if they gave a breathing because when they told me because I, , demanded that right off the bat too in breathing treatments. And because it was I was just going normal, , respiratory. And they told me it was contraindicated, and I was like, what?
Speaker 3 ·
, you don't like, no. They can't breathe. So but their excuse was because they would blow the virus.
Speaker 2 ·
And by the and this and here we go with another.
Speaker 2 ·
Bullshit line. Let's face it. The majority of these patients who are in negative pressure rooms, which means that anything that's happening in that room is being flushed outside through a ventilation system. So if that patient is doing breathing treatments in that room, it's not going anywhere outside the room. Don't give me this horseshit. But because the families are locked out and because the families are not medically trained and because the families are kept in chaos, usually in the dark,.
Speaker 2 ·
They don't know until they get the medical records and they get people to explain things to them. They don't realize they shoulda had somebody by the throat. That's just the way it is. It would have gotten you kicked out. But in my case, what I didn't know was I wasn't raising hell because I don't even know why I thought so. I don't want to piss off anybody because they might mistreat him, and he's delicate right now. He's helpless. They wouldn't have taken him on in a bar fight. He'd have killed he'd have killed a few people on his way out the door. But in this case,.
Speaker 2 ·
They had a helpless person, and they I was determined not to upset anybody, ruffle any feathers, give him any reason to take it out on him. And my children, I did not know this, were sending donuts and pizza and coffee and all kinds of stuff up there to that floor to guarantee the good care to their father.
Speaker 1 ·
You were right, protocol, because you've heard me say this before.
Speaker 1 ·
They will take it out on your loved one if you piss them off because they literally overdosed my husband within twenty four hours when I pissed that hospital off. They literally gave him a huge number of respiratory suppressants. I sent it to him. I sent a letter of demand on Friday, October 2. Less than twenty four hours later, the next day on Saturday, the third, I get a call saying his pupils were no longer responding to light. In other words, they were fixed and they were dilated, which means he'd had some, , neurological insult, which is most commonly.
Speaker 1 ·
Associated with overdose in that case when you haven't had a heart attack or a stroke or anything else. And it was because I saw a lot of demand for the treatments that I wanted after being really trying to work with him, and I saw they weren't going to do what he needed. And so then he got Precedex, Nimbex, morphine, Ativan, fentanyl, propofol, and that's exactly what caused his, basically brain death. Yeah. So, yeah, your instincts were correct. If you piss them off and you push them in a direction they don't wanna go, that's what they did with him. He survived the remdesivir,.
Speaker 1 ·
The dehydration, the lack of food, went on the ventilator, and then they just overdosed him when I wanted to, get the, ivermectin and hydroxy.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. And because they were drugging these victims out of their minds with everything from high dose opiates like morphine, Xanax, and all the rest of it, and isolating victims from their families, the family would call for a check-in on the rare occasion you could actually get through and speak to your loved one, they would sound out of it. They didn't seem very with it. So victim victims, the families who are victims themselves would be like, oh, jeez. It's a lot worse than I thought. He was just fine a few hours ago. This progressed really quickly.
Speaker 0 ·
When really they were just downed out.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. That's exactly what they did.
Speaker 1 ·
Because they, to have a quiet sedated patient was much easier to deal with than a patient who had, know, needs you had to meet. So yeah. And the other thing is when they overdosed Bob, then suddenly I could come in. The day oh, you can come in. I'm like, what? You kept me out for twenty two days. And now that he's something has happened to him, which you're not telling me what happened. I didn't find out till six months later. Now my son and I can come in.
Speaker 1 ·
And that's because they wanted me to see it, and they wanted me to consent and sign for them to pull the tube. That's the only reason they let me in there.
Speaker 3 ·
, too, if you guys think about this, like, Miriam, especially what I'm talking about, but they would have had to reprogram their Pyxuses and, because you have a each nurse has a number when you're given high drugs like that. Everybody has a number so that they can keep track of it. And then even if, say, I want my patient needed it a little bit early and I wanted to go get it early, You have to do a whole bunch of crap to override the whole system, and there's no way they would have been able to do that every time.
Speaker 1 ·
Do what I'm saying? Yeah. Meaning, it was intentional. It took work to be able to do that. Mhmm. Yeah. It wasn't yeah. They were it wasn't easy for them to do it, so they had to intentionally work at it to overdose Bob. Yep.
Speaker 0 ·
In large part, like we were talking about at the beginning of this space, people are resilient. In many cases, they had to isolate people for twenty, forty days and subject them to this protocol before they finally gave up.
Speaker 0 ·
Not to say that anyone gave up, but before they were killed.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, they could only fight for so long., there's just there comes a point where the body just can't and the mind probably goes a lot faster than the body, to be honest, because the nurses and the doctors and the technicians and the respiratory therapists that were involved may not ever recognize that they were trained to use tactics that are designed for mind control, and.
Speaker 2 ·
And it was torture., that just is what it was. It was torture. I have put in the purple pill and also in the nest the speech from RFK junior. And if you if, , it's it's about forty five minutes long, so, , it's a pain in the neck, and I know he's not easy to listen to. But if you've ever had to spend time with anybody at a hospital or after a hospital stay related to COVID. And in some cases, by the way, other medic other medical conditions are being treated with similar protocols.
Speaker 2 ·
If you hear or when you heard that was it three or four children died in West Texas from the measles? That's not what happened. The measles were going away. If they're not treated properly, they can lead to pneumonia. It was the pneumonia that was improperly treated, the almost identical way that they treated COVID.
Speaker 2 ·
Aaron Siri is in one of those suits. I hope he drags those doctors through the mud the entire.
Speaker 2 ·
Time. I would love to watch that live.
Speaker 2 ·
I'm so done. We are as of right now, I don't know if Miriam or Chelsea any of what the status is for, Scott Shera's I think, if I recall, it's been delayed.
Speaker 2 ·
Until next week.
Speaker 1 ·
The last I heard, the next date was December 19.
Speaker 2 ·
Okay. So that's, yeah, that's a week. That's what I heard. Yeah.
Speaker 2 ·
I think that dot that judge doesn't want anybody to know that, , this looks really bad for me. Yeah. It does look bad for you, dude. You were a dumbass.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. Clearly. Absolutely.
Speaker 0 ·
And, honestly, that first court case didn't get near enough media attention. I don't know if I saw any mainstream coverage of it even despite the social media uproar and the press conferences that they held. I don't think they even bothered, paying it a bit of lip service, which is it's infuriating, and it really it informs the landscape that we are still fighting to this day. The narrative landscape that is still legacy media is still in the pocket of the curators who help facilitate this.
Speaker 2 ·
For the people who are in the audience who aren't familiar with what we're talking about, Scott Shera's daughter was 19 years old. She was a Down syndrome child. She was smart. She was slick as a whip. You could drive a car and play a violin. And she went out of the hospital on the 10/06/2021 and was dead on the thirteenth. That's how quick they did it. No remdesivir. No ventilator. He wouldn't have either one of them. And so in the last they kept her on sedatives, And he told them, , every time you give her whatever you need to give her, I need to promote.
Speaker 2 ·
I need to know what it is because I wanna know everything. I got I want, ask me first. Well, they didn't tell him. They didn't tell him they were giving her sedatives.
Speaker 2 ·
That is legal. Even though she's Down syndrome and under the care of a parent who was fully capable of making decisions for his daughter, It is legal and ethical according to the lead ethicist at Johns Hopkins University Hospital. Is that a university? I may be wrong about that. The point being, she said, this ethicist said if it is normal and customary in that department of that hospital to use a particular drug or treatment, then the family or the patient does not need to provide informed consent.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And that's exactly why,.
Speaker 1 ·
, you need to really get your health bulletproof because you don't wanna go in there because you have no rights. They can put whatever they want into your IV, into your veins, and they don't have to tell you anything.
Speaker 2 ·
So, anyway, very last they had her on Precedex for days,.
Speaker 2 ·
And they overdosed her the first two nights she was there. And they never told him what was going on as they saved her life.
Speaker 3 ·
Which is a drug, by the way, that you're only supposed to use in twenty four hours.
Speaker 2 ·
Twenty four hours of action. Because it causes.
Speaker 2 ·
It is known to cause acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Speaker 2 ·
And so on the last day, they added lorazepam or Ativan. You can say either one. It depends on whether it's the name brand or not.
Speaker 2 ·
And then at the end of the day, the doctor added morphine., they needed to slow her breathing down. She was breathing too fast. So they added morphine on top of everything else. And.
Speaker 2 ·
The second shot of morphine, which, by the way, this whole thing, the lorazepam and the Ativan were done, I think it was a twenty minute span. The nurse goes back in, checks her blood pressure, cannot find blood pressure, and gives her another shot of morphine.
Speaker 2 ·
And the jury said, not guilty. Sorry. Dismiss the case.
Speaker 2 ·
So Scott has decided and part of this, they believe, stems from the judge not allowing them to talk about certain things related to the protocol and also for prejudicing the jury because the Sherahs are Christians,.
Speaker 2 ·
And they demonize them.
Speaker 2 ·
So they have but the judge that oversaw the case has to approve a new trial with another judge, and that is supposed to be heard next Friday.
Speaker 2 ·
So that's why we're so pissed. Literally, no blood pressure. Give her another shot of morphine. Not guilty.
Speaker 2 ·
And that was the only jury trial for any COVID case nationwide.
Speaker 2 ·
So
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And this is a otherwise healthy 18 year old young girl. You should really go and look at her pictures and his substack because it will break your heart. She laughed. She had this great sense of humor. She literally could play the violin, and she drove. She loved Elvis. She.
Speaker 1 ·
Just was a beautiful person, and she deserved to live. She didn't deserve to be overdosed to death and then have a jury say not guilty.
Speaker 3 ·
Who didn't take more than fifteen minutes?
Speaker 1 ·
And this is exactly what happened, what we're describing to you guys. And how in the world a jury of people can sit there and even hear a portion of that and decide that the hospital's not guilty? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 0 ·
I've penned Grace's story on CHBMP to the nest, and it's in the purple pill. If you haven't heard it, it's it's heartbreaking. She's, , she's such a beautiful and innocent little girl and just in the prime of her life, and they valued her life at mill. And the family watched seeing what they were doing and tried to stop them. And they were like, nope, DNR.
Speaker 2 ·
And by the way, the family didn't know that there was a DNR. The reason there was a do not resuscitate order on Grace was because the doctor had repeatedly hounded Scott and Cindy to approve a blanket.
Speaker 2 ·
Ventilator order. If we need a ventilator, we don't need we can just do it right now without asking for your permission. And Scott said no. He wasn't going to have a blanket order for a ventilator applied to his daughter. He wanted that call that said, hey. This is what's going on. We need to do this. He wasn't just gonna say go ahead and do it if you feel like you need to. He did not know and neither did anybody else until this happened.
Speaker 2 ·
By refusing the blanket DNR the no. Do not innovate. The d.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. DNI because that's where they felt they had the right to go one step further. They conflated the two. Right. Because if we if we can't if we can't intubate,.
Speaker 2 ·
Then that means you're authorizing a do not resuscitate because we've got no other options if we can't use the ventilator,.
Speaker 2 ·
Which is bullshit. Deborah can tell you. Miriam can tell you.
Speaker 2 ·
That's bullshit. Because they can bag her and contact her parents and do CPR while they make a decision with the parent. There was no reason to.
Speaker 1 ·
Do that. Yeah. There's absolutely no reason because anytime anybody, let's say, they choke, , you immediately try to get the object out if you're able to, then you do ventilate them to give them breath. And if their heart stops because they haven't had oxygen long enough, you do the CPR and the breaths. And you can do that for an extended period of time until the ambulance arrives, until somebody else takes over. So there is no reason ever to conflate not intubating somebody with a do not resuscitate. The whole point is to preserve life until you can't anymore,.
Speaker 1 ·
And then you call it. So no. They're just a bunch of evil liars because they wanted to do what they wanted to do, and they achieved it. They overdosed her. They didn't care that they overdosed her and made her stop breathing twice. So they needed an empty bed. Yeah. They needed the empty bed. And, , and they gave her Narcan twice to bring her back. Well, obviously, they want to keep her in the bed for those two episodes. They I guess, they hadn't made enough money on the bed days. The first two times, they almost killed her. But the third time, they'd had her there long enough.
Speaker 1 ·
So, , never mind. We'll just, we won't waste any resources on her at that point. But we can kill her twice, bring her back with Narcan until we're ready to do it the third time. And that's literally what they did, guys. They literally overdosed her to the point that she stopped breathing, and they had to give her Narcan to start her breathing again. The third time they overdosed her, he'd already put the DNR on her chart, so they just watched her die.
Speaker 1 ·
That's what they did. They stood back and watched her die.
Speaker 0 ·
They would also dupe families into a DNR by saying, oh, well, , if we try to resuscitate your loved one, we're gonna hurt them really badly. Do you want us to hurt them really badly?
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. That's pretty sick. But, yeah, they did do that.
Speaker 0 ·
I have I had recent cohost protocol with him.
Speaker 1 ·
I had, a doctor say to me in a conference because I was very displeased with what they had done, that, I wasn't concerned about my husband, because I wasn't willing to, give them leeway to do palliative or to pull the tube after they had already overdosed him. I wasn't concerned about my husband. This is the,.
Speaker 1 ·
Just the mindset of these people that they think they have the right to dictate life and death and to try to guilt you into doing what they want.
Speaker 1 ·
So and I wish it was just my story or just Deborah's or even just Grace's, but we saw this over and over and over again in the 25 commonalities that have been documented. This was the consistent behavior, the consistent protocol that was done to the patients and the families.
Speaker 0 ·
Protocol widow, welcome back. She was probably gone linking Grace's story. Her website is linked in the purple pill and in the nest. Definitely. Yeah. Definitely worth a visit.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. My sound went to heck in a handbasket, and it took me three attempts to get back on. So.
Speaker 3 ·
, the beautiful thing about what the sheriffs have done with Grace, though, when the backstory is he has spent way, if they would've won the case, there was a cap of 700, 000. He has spent, like, well over 1, 000, 000 on this case. And it's not about the money. It ain't about any of that. It's to get her story well, first of all, is to get it on record. Second of all, now it is hopefully, he'll end up proving his point, but it's not about the money or none of that. It's about principle with them, and I just love them for that.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. Because, what we learned the hard way listening to the wrap up on the case was, in most states, and in this case, this would be Wisconsin. Miriam, I might need your help on this. It seems to me that there's a cap of $250, 000 that they could have won had they won the case. Now.
Speaker 3 ·
The Oh, Sherry and what and his that case was 700, 000. That cap in Michigan, the cap is $2.50, but I heard Scott say it the other day that his the cap, the most they could have gotten was 700, 000.
Speaker 2 ·
Okay. So it must be the, the money for the attorneys. One of those is capped at 250. And I bet you it would be what the attorney could charge, which would make sense because they'd I remember them talking at the news conference about there is no incentive for attorneys to take malpractice cases or wrongful death cases if they're they're limited by the amount of money they can actually earn off of the thing with all of the in-depth cost that goes into it with specialists and certifications and.
Speaker 2 ·
Depositions and, , just in and out of the courtroom and fees and whatnot. And then look at where they are right now. They're going back in again.
Speaker 3 ·
Work with the if you take in all the things you just said and how much work that is, and Scott put in he's not an attorney. He but he also put as much time as the attorneys. They worked great with them the whole time. Mhmm. So, know, you a whole bunch of money and then all of think of all the time that, I forget how many because he was saying he was working, like,.
Speaker 3 ·
On it, like, fourteen hours a day. Some ridiculous, a lot.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. And, , and what the entire if for those folks that don't that don't know the Sheriff's story, once they lost Grace and then they figured out why they lost her or at least, like, I guess, how they lost her was probably the first clue. That's when he started researching. And so now he's got the podcast. He's been on everybody else's podcast multiple times. He's, they've got the sub stack. They've got of course, they've got social media pages. And all of these things take time, but he's also been doing so much research and going back over history.
Speaker 2 ·
And putting together things. Here's a here's a prime example of something that I learned from him that's really important to people like all of us sitting here right now.
Speaker 2 ·
In the, in Obamacare, cannot tell you what page off the top of my head, but I know it's there. I've done I've done a screenshot of it. There is a brief blurb, and it basically says, if you are a physician in a hospital and you refuse to partake in a euthanasia,.
Speaker 2 ·
You are protected from any retribution from your employer.
Speaker 2 ·
When you look at that from the reverse side, that means we encourage euthanasia, but we won't punish you if you opt not to part participate.
Speaker 2 ·
That's in your
Speaker 2 ·
Health care act that they're trying to figure out how to keep funded.
Speaker 2 ·
And
Speaker 3 ·
Scott's a wealth of, as much time as he put into the case, he has a wealth of information on about every subject you wanna come up with on this. Yeah. Exactly.
Speaker 0 ·
It was painful to watch the trial because he's made it his mission to be so well versed in all these things and craft his message so carefully that they didn't attack him. They attacked Grace's mother Mhmm. For the things she had said. And that's how they really succeeded, I think, from my vantage in tainting the jury Mhmm. Because, , she's a grieving mother. She's allowed to say things, but.
Speaker 0 ·
In a court of law, everything you say can and will be held against you. And they just to apply this to criminals is one thing, but to apply it to the grieving family of a victim of these protocols was it was heinous, and it was very hard to watch.
Speaker 2 ·
I at one point, I commented, I think, on Scott's substack.
Speaker 2 ·
And I don't know. I don't even I can't even tell you what the context of what he had, posted. And, I just pointed out. I said, Appleton is not a huge town in comparison. It's not like San Francisco or Washington DC. And I thought that the.
Speaker 2 ·
There was a good chance that the there were plenty of people on that jury who might have a family member or a close friend or a neighbor who worked at the hospital, had worked at the hospital, was preparing to work at the hospital that was going to taint the jury pool from that, , that side of the story too. And he replied, I agree. So, , it's it's they really should have had a change of venue, in my opinion. They should not have been doing it in the town that she was killed in.
Speaker 3 ·
I absolutely agree with you on Sherry. And they weren't they talking about maybe not doing it in this time there? I imagine that they probably yeah.
Speaker 2 ·
They should move it. They should request to change a venue on that.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And I don't know if they did formally request one and it got denied or I have no. I haven't read anything about that one way or the other, but I'm shocked that his lawyer didn't do that considering.
Speaker 2 ·
That. Well, But his lawyer was,.
Speaker 3 ·
Who's our guy here? Mendenhall. Yeah. Mendenhall. Oh, and he wasn't the only one. He had it Yeah. I know. But you didn't know. If Mendenhall coulda got him, you woulda thought he'da went for that first off. Yeah. Oh. As much as well as we all know him.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, maybe, they may have asked for a change of venue considering I thought initially watching the judge that he was fairly evenly handed, but I didn't understand why certain things weren't being said. And then it wasn't until after the trial was over when we find out that they were handcuffed, so to speak, or muzzled, so to speak. So they couldn't talk about certain things. And it's like, oh, that was all set up before the trial even started.
Speaker 3 ·
That But, , Scott always every time I've heard him speak, though, he liked the judge.? He felt he was, , pretty well for being in Wisconsin, the man was pretty fair.
Speaker 2 ·
I thought he was too by watching it. Yeah. But I and I can't remember what all it was that I think they wouldn't allow them to talk about the protocols for one. Right. Yeah. The other thing that they did was the judge dismissed all charges prior to the end of the trial that were being leveled at the nurse who did the final morphine shot.
Speaker 2 ·
Because she was up for battery. I think they were they were using that as a battery case. And days before they came to the end of the trial, she was that portion of the of the charges was dismissed,.
Speaker 0 ·
Which was
Speaker 2 ·
Wrong because the doctor wasn't even on the floor. When she made that second shot within, what, fifteen minutes, seven minutes, something like that, between the two shots of morphine, the doctor was not on the floor. So the doctor might have given her.
Speaker 2 ·
Whatever you guys call those directions where they can make their own decisions about when to apply something.
Speaker 1 ·
Standing orders.
Speaker 2 ·
Standing orders. There you go. Yes. Standing orders. So the so the doctor may have given standing orders for the morphine, but when she checked Grace's blood pressure and it was not registering, what made her think that this was an option? Parameters with your standing order, but you don't need a standing order for that one. That's just common sense. You would think. And this is a woman who had fourteen years of ICU experience.
Speaker 3 ·
Mhmm. And this is what I'm gonna say about her too. Even though that judge let her out, I am surprised that the nursing board they should have come after her anyway, and they can. They don't need the court to do that.? Once that was out, I'm surprised that somebody hasn't pushed to have her license.
Speaker 2 ·
They're not going to. I don't think we're going to see anybody who towed the line get attacked by a board because they want to protect the government mandates and directions because this is where the money pot is coming from the government. And.
Speaker 0 ·
It's 2025 and MTB, Mary Talia Boden, just faced her medical board and the medical board won.
Speaker 2 ·
Yeah. They've re did that does that mean she's had her license pulled or is she just decertified?
Speaker 0 ·
She's she's,
Speaker 2 ·
Committed to fighting it. So Oh, yeah. I'm sure. What the status is. Earlier this evening, I was looking at She's on appeal now. Right? I'm sorry? Is she on it's appeal now. Right? She's getting well, she has to file the appeal. But, no, this just happened yesterday.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah. I know. Yeah. Because I, watched part of it.
Speaker 5 ·
Yeah.
Speaker 0 ·
On the flip side, Simone Gold took on her medical board and won. And now she is.
Speaker 2 ·
Offense. Really going on offense and taking them to court. Yeah. Yeah. She's that was filed three days ago, I believe.
Speaker 3 ·
But that's my point. Here, these guys save lives. Then, , they've got the record that backs them. This chick literally did she made a severe medical error just in the medicine alone because anybody know, there's just there's rules to it. So you don't give you don't take somebody's have no pulse, no blood pressure, and give morphine. You just don't do that.
Speaker 3 ·
And a nurse of fourteen years should know better.
Speaker 0 ·
And giving nicotine patches to nonsmokers, which inadvertently may have had a positive effect because we know nicotine can actually be preventative, for COVID. Just wanna throw it out there, mister Reptoid. Whenever you whenever you circle back and you wanna chime in, please feel free.
Speaker 3 ·
I just wanna make a point about I am pretty well convinced on the nicotine thing because, , obviously, I was up north taking care of my brother, my older brother, but my, Jeff was at home with my younger brother. My younger brother was definitely very, very sick. But I do believe because Jeff was an ex smoker, Tony was still smoking. I had him on inhalers. I got him antibiotics, things like that. And, but he thought he was gonna die a few times.
Speaker 3 ·
, he was bad, but he did survive. And he's got some issues now. But I do believe that is that was a huge factor. And then I got sick when I got home in, , in between, when I left my brother and went home so I could be closer to Jeff. I got sick. I took nothing, but I, , had been on my vitamins and doing all that and been around lots of backs. People wasn't even thinking about any of that and thought it without anything.? So but I smoke also.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. Nicotine, upregulated hemoglobin production and downregulates ACE two. So it took the virus more effort before it was able to deplete hemoglobin, which was we known, we knew for a long time, but they're acknowledging, COVID was never it wasn't putting people on vents didn't make any sense at all because it wasn't in a lung issue. It was a blood.
Speaker 3 ·
Issue carrying definitely vascular. Yes. Yeah. Yes. Because that was, with Jeff, , yes, he couldn't breathe and all that.? But had I known some of the stuff that they did, I could've.
Speaker 3 ·
Went home and done it myself because I had a BiPAP machine there.? I had the skill. I'm not saying I could've.
Speaker 3 ·
Saved him there., I don't think I could've because he was pretty bad. But my point is his everything with Jeff was vascular until he got the until it went to bacterial pneumonia.
Speaker 0 ·
And you found out ultimately that he had gone and secretly gotten the shots, which may have Right. Brought all of the.
Speaker 3 ·
That totally makes because when I found out, when I got his records, this is where the what it what it had confused me. I'm like, they why did they vaccinate him? And it was like, would have been the fourteenth day thing. But none I didn't know he had done the first one, so I just couldn't make sense of that. So when I did see that but, yes, when the night he got sick, all the symptoms he was showing me, I if I'd have known that, I could've? I don't I don't know that I could've saved him anyway because he ended up stroking out., his first.
Speaker 3 ·
Problem was his hemoglobin went sky high, which he was on blood thinners already. So that just didn't make any sense. So, yes, it was definitely vascular. And if you think about the way it hit the other organs, it was because of that, just like Marion explained earlier, which she did always a beautiful job, it was all blood flow.
Speaker 0 ·
Yep. So putting people on vents, resulted in eighty to ninety percent death of anyone who went on the vent was pointless and counterproductive to begin with.
Speaker 1 ·
Exactly., and there were so many signs there because, , the docs were originally saying, oh, we've never seen, , a virus behave like this. That's because it wasn't a viral pneumonia. Like, they were pushing it as it was literally, you weren't getting oxygenation of your blood simply because even the blood flow was being, , obstructed due to the micro clotting going even into the lungs so that even the alveoli, that's the little sacs that exchange the oxygen and oxygenate the blood there. And you can't oxygenate blood if it's not fully perfusing.
Speaker 1 ·
Into those alveoli. And the and the sad thing is, , they didn't even want people having aspirin.
Speaker 3 ·
And an Well and what that sorry, ma'am. I just wanna add to you right there on this, and then you can go on. I didn't mean to interrupt, but kinda. Anyway, it was because they all realized doing that, which caused the mucus to get so bad, it's called ground glass. And, and a lot of people don't know what that is, but that it's like, it literally does turn you got these little pustules, but they do turn into, like, a glass.
Speaker 3 ·
It's it's bad. Yep. And almost a lot of patients out there, it's in their records, but they don't know what it is. Exactly.
Speaker 0 ·
Because I remember the glass.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. The ground glass appearance. Yeah. Because, , a typical real pneumonia, you're gonna see, , almost like in an infiltration, you will literally see, like, a filling effect at the bottom of the lungs. And they were trying to oxygenate people like a regular pneumonia and that was never ever going to work. And what really strikes me as particularly sinister, it's almost like they knew because they didn't want they didn't want people to even have aspirin.
Speaker 1 ·
And I'm like, aspirin alone would have helped with the oxygenation because it would have, , thinned out some of the micro clotting. So it's very disgusting looking back on it now because.
Speaker 3 ·
It seems intentional. Very Yeah. Because what's the first thing they tell you to do at home?, I think everybody on earth knows that if you're having a heart attack, taking aspirin.
Speaker 1 ·
Right. Because Immediately.
Speaker 3 ·
Yeah.? His chances of you living are much higher.
Speaker 1 ·
Well, and I knew this myself because in 2010, I ended up with blood clots in both my lungs because I was having an autoimmune crisis. And I went to the hospital, and the idiots missed it entirely. They said they saw thyroid nodules and didn't see anything in my lungs. So I ended up giving myself three hundred twenty five milligrams of aspirin to stop the sharp stabbing pains inside my lungs and I was literally breathing rapidly because I couldn't get enough oxygen. Does it sound familiar?
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. Because if you're not getting if you're clotting, you're not going to have the gas exchange in the alveoli. So I had I had already lived it, and it's just disgusting that I think they knew. I think it just doesn't make sense to me that they would not want people to even have an aspirin.
Speaker 3 ·
That I just want so I can know I'm gonna die because I'm allergic to it. So Oh, you're allergic to aspirin? Oh my goodness. Well,.
Speaker 0 ·
That's how powerful the propaganda was at the time. They were discouraging use of literally anything that was shown to demonstrate any efficacy because they had to have nothing else that could work before they could ram through their warp speed vaccines and the subsequent mandates. Yeah. And we haven't touched on tonight, but the withholding of monoclonal antibodies, which was another thing that demonstrated some efficacy based on skin color or other demographics to effectively to penalize the privileged and ensure that the.
Speaker 0 ·
Minorities or the underprivileged would have access to monoclonals. So they had people coming in dying who could have benefited from the monoclonals, and those were held out. They were reserved in case someone more needy down the line came in and wanted them. And when in the history of triage do you sit on medicine that works when you have a patient you're looking at now that needs treatment? And for that matter, to withhold anything based on race or skin color or religion or ethnicity or any of it. This is all so patently un American, and it was done And it was sanctioned,.
Speaker 0 ·
And it was part of the protocol.
Speaker 3 ·
Well and also, a lot of times, they pick or they I don't know how to say that, but people with darker skin are usually have thicker blood already anyway. So anything that.
Speaker 3 ·
If they held anything, their chances of dying were are higher.
Speaker 3 ·
Because a lot of times, , they have thicker blood.
Speaker 0 ·
But I've never seen mainstream authorized discrimination. Like, I'm not old enough to remember segregation and my entire life, the ethos that was surrounding me was be color blind, you don't see race, you don't, all of this. And then to see people turned away What? Because of the color of their skin,.
Speaker 0 ·
That was really horrific to see. And that was part of their, hand in hand, at least, with their DEI and, other social changes that they were trying to ram through, because they had the pretext of this so called emergency and the pandemic.
Speaker 0 ·
Globe destroyer, you still there? Jump in anytime. Just saying.
Speaker 0 ·
Are we? Oh, we have gone over. We've gone over by, like, an hour now. I'm sorry, ladies. We were just having such a good conversation.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. It is a good conversation.
Speaker 0 ·
Really just so many injustices in the course of the last five years, and that they're just trying to say, yeah, we killed people. Let's move on. A few years ago, at least, they floated a pandemic amnesty, which at least hinted that they understood the severity of what they have done. But now we appear to be barreling forward with very little lip service to the idea of accountability. Still, we have Fauci, his preemptive blanket pardon through 2014 appears to have been at least verbally rescinded. We'll see how that plays out in the courts.
Speaker 0 ·
But I would I would love for them to arrest him sooner than later and, , let due process work that out while they do that because he is patently, obviously, at least if nothing else, even if you don't believe any of the things we've discussed here tonight, we all know he's responsible for the creation of the virus that upended all of our lives to begin with and gave them the plausible deniability to carry all of this other stuff out in service of their agendas. So he, at the very least, should be rigorously interrogated, not given these softball interviews where he just says,.
Speaker 0 ·
I don't recall 200 times. No. He should be grilled, and anyone who collaborated with him to craft and carry out these policies should be held to account, I believe, to the fullest extent of the law.
Speaker 3 ·
Well, at the beginning, he always whenever he talked, , he always had that freaking little smirk on his face. Yeah.
Speaker 1 ·
And here's the thing. He claimed to be the science. And if you question me, you're me the science. And what? You can't make that claim and actually push the narrative so hard and then think that people that people are going to forget and let you off the hook. You put yourself in the supreme position of being the science, the expert who is not to be questioned, well, then you have culpability, sir.
Speaker 0 ·
The ultimate culpability, honestly, for, he was at the head of the agencies that paid twice to have, have the coronavirus gain of function research that we, I think is there a consensus now? Do we all concede? Does the entire world acknowledge that this was a gain of function virus that came from a lab leak somewhere in Wuhan? Are we all on the same page? Because for a long time, we couldn't even say that out loud. I don't see anybody.
Speaker 1 ·
Really openly arguing the converse now because everybody's pretty much admitted it. So, yeah, I think that's why he is in a bit of a compromised position now. And if they wanted to make him the sacrificial lamb and appropriately so, No. Let's change that. The sacrificial wolf in sheep's clothing because that's what he is. If they wanted to make him that, I think, , it might work very well because he set himself up to be the expert, and he should bear that responsibility.
Speaker 3 ·
And was paid a lot of freaking money because it's just his normal salary is almost 500, 000.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And he got $5, 000, 000 richer too, during that time from his royalties from Moderna. So he's got a lot of blood on his hands and a lot of blood money in his pocket.
Speaker 3 ·
And his wife's involved too.
Speaker 1 ·
Oh, yeah. She is she her hands aren't clean either.
Speaker 2 ·
Well, as creasy as those two are, I wouldn't be surprised if there's family members who aren't invested for them.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. I'm sure. I'm sure there's plenty of skeletons in that closet.
Speaker 2 ·
After all, they represent science. Skeletons should be normal for them, especially all the people that he's managed to kill over the decades.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah., it's just it's mind boggling, but like I said, I think the only way we'll ever see it is if is if the system actually needs to take somebody down to satisfy.
Speaker 1 ·
The people who've suffered. And for that, there has to be enough pressure that they feel like they have to, , sacrifice one of their own. So we'll see. We'll see if that ever happens.
Speaker 3 ·
Why can't we have a patsy for a change?
Speaker 0 ·
Seems all we're given these days are plausible patsies, but what do I know?
Speaker 0 ·
No. Patsy absolutely has to be held to account. And I think most people know that. They're they're openly asking Bill Gates about, , being a villain, and he's having to, oh, well, , let the people decide. I think the people roundly have, in large part, those who are paying any attention at all. And I can't wait for the court of public opinion to become, , or to usher in actual courts to get some actual justice going around here because it is sorely needed.
Speaker 1 ·
It sure is, particularly with those two. Those two,.
Speaker 1 ·
I if anyone were ever deserving of the court of opinion pushing it into the legal court courts, it is it is those two. But, , they both have such hubris. Like, for Gates to have the nerve to say that, because I don't think he realizes how hated he actually is. That took some nerve to say that.
Speaker 3 ·
Well, I hang on to pride goes before the fall.
Speaker 3 ·
Just saying.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. And Ultimately, they are going to pay a price for what they've done. And I take comfort in that because all the money and all the power that they've gained, one day they will leave that behind. It won't go with them, and they won't have anybody protecting them from the divine retribution that is coming. So, , you could slip through the news here. You can run. You can hide here, but you there won't be anybody protecting you from justice in the in the life to come. So.
Speaker 1 ·
There you go.
Speaker 2 ·
See, I have to stay quiet because anything that I want to say probably shouldn't be on a recorded space in public.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. Well, that's why I stick to the divine retribution because yeah. Yeah. If I described what I would like them to suffer, yeah, wouldn't be good. But, , the.
Speaker 3 ·
We could do it in medical terms and make it interesting,.
Speaker 2 ·
Miriam. Could. They, we could we could go for the innocence., all those children in the AZT and others experiments that he did, the Fosters Oh, how and the orphans. I'd love to see the him unable to sleep because those children come to visit him every night.
Speaker 1 ·
Yeah. He has such a lack of conscience. I it I don't know. I think some people, people like him, are literally lost causes. They I don't think he can even begin to realize the suffering and the horror that he has caused or even care about it, which is why I don't feel any empathy for him for what is literally going to come to him one day. And it is. Because, , we all leave we come into the world and we leave the world, and, you don't get to take any all these things that you sacrificed people for, all the blood that's on your hands,.
Speaker 1 ·
There's a price to be paid for that, and he will pay it.
Speaker 0 ·
And just because you don't believe in God doesn't mean you won't have to face him someday.
Speaker 1 ·
Yep. And what? We all we all leave this world. And no matter what you believe,.
Speaker 1 ·
However you live here, there's there's you reap what you sow. And I firmly believe that I can go to the next life at peace, seeing my husband again. He's not gonna have that. He's there's some terrible things coming for him.
Speaker 0 ·
And on that cheerful note, what do you say, ladies?
Speaker 3 ·
I am gonna end this on my note as I think it's gonna come for a lot of them.
Speaker 1 ·
I think so too. And what? It sounds like a terrible note, but what would be really terrible? Is if is if there wasn't any justice., then what would we really have in this life or in the next life to look forward to? We have to know that there's a balance there and that in and of itself is a is a hopeful thing. It gives us peace that we can live.
Speaker 1 ·
Now and with a modicum of peace, and we can also look forward to the future that justice will be done. So in a way, that's a very hopeful thing. It's not anything that they can have any hope in, but we can. So, , that gives us the strength to continue the fight. So just wanted to say to everyone,.
Speaker 1 ·
I think that's a reason for hope and for peace and to know that there is justice coming. So I just wanna thank you all for being here. It's been a great night. It's been a long one, but time flew. And, I look forward to seeing you guys again next week.
Speaker 0 ·
Thank you so much, Miriam. Protocolida?
Speaker 2 ·
I wanna thank everybody who hung in here this evening and visited us so late and or early if you wanna count it as a Sunday morning instead of a Saturday night.
Speaker 2 ·
Really appreciate all of you guys. It's kinda like knowing we're having family over.? I think I told you once I appreciate it that you didn't spill any wine on the carpet while you were here.
Speaker 3 ·
And we I was gonna ask you what time dinner it was.
Speaker 2 ·
I've gotta remember. I've got a turkey thawing that I wanna put in a smoker tomorrow today since I'm, , thinking about it in a couple of hours. But, anyway, everybody have a wonderful weekend, and, be safe. We still have one more Saturday night before Christmas that we get to see each other. And I hope that if you don't come, that you have a wonderful Christmas. Happy New Years. Be safe, and, try to stay warm. Most of the country's gonna be freezing this week for a couple days, and do everything you can to take care of your.
Speaker 2 ·
Your puppies and your kitties and whatever else that needs to be warmed up. And be safe on your way home tonight. Thank you so much for being here. We'll talk to you next week.
Speaker 0 ·
Thank you so much, protocol widow, and thank you so much, ladies, for giving so much of your time every Saturday night, every single week for years now to help us advance this mission and raise awareness and demand accountability for all of the horrific things that you have been personally put through and that they put your husbands through. And I'm I'm so sorry about the circumstances around which we meet, but I am so grateful for you, and I couldn't hope for better company as we continue to fight this uphill battle all the way to inevitable victory. Because as Miriam says,.
Speaker 0 ·
We win. We do win in the end. And I'm very grateful for all of you for coming and staying and listening and for coming on and sharing your stories. I'm sorry we didn't get to hear from you tonight,.
Speaker 0 ·
Globe destroyer, but maybe another week.
Speaker 0 ·
And the others who came on mic and get didn't get a chance to speak. X is very buggy, and we do tend to go on. But I hope that we are here for you. Reach out to us anytime, and we'll be here again next Saturday night. I hope you'll rejoin us and come on and share your stories. I hope by then, x will have worked out a few of these bugs, and we can have a smoother go of it. But thank you for hanging in there, and, thank you for sharing these stories. Please visit the anniversaries page and.
Speaker 0 ·
Look some of those over and share them with someone and help us raise awareness about these stories that it's been so painful for the victims to come forward and document, but that they've had the courage to do so nonetheless and get these out so that we can turn the tide and usher in a brighter future rather than this dystopia that they've been laying groundwork for with all of these terrible policies. Thank you guys so much. Please visit the Substack, chbmp.substack.com. This space will be archived along with our other spaces,.
Speaker 0 ·
And you can share them from there or on Spotify. Thanks again. See you next Saturday and every Saturday at 8PM eastern. Have a wonderful week, and, we look forward to seeing you again next Saturday. Good night, everyone.

Replies

RezPhoenix (@ValerieAngelaS1)
@CHBMPorg I thought this was about Covid. It's apparently about Christmas decor. Bye
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
@ValerieAngelaS1 Come back to request a mic, and share your story.
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
Please review the guidelines for our Space, especially before requesting mic: https://t.co/1TrER8j5Yz X will delete this recording! Subscribe & share our archive (https://t.co/MMo0BThYcf) & listen on Spotify at https://t.co/aqphmgLNim. This Space will be archived at those links.
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
https://t.co/z3QiOH2r4Z
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
https://t.co/UzW5XseTvb
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
https://t.co/gqkZBLiXd0
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
https://t.co/hLIu2LBrr4
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg HORRIFYING RESULTS of WHITE FIBROUS CLOT TESTING FINDS “Alteration of Normal Ratio of 3 Fibrinogen Subcomponents from 1:1:1 Alpha:Beta:Gamma Strands TO ABNORMAL 9:4:1 Gamma:Alpha:Beta Strands. 🚨With conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin being altered, suspected fibrinogen…
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg Elon’s X Everything App APPARENTLY Has Been “Coming” (for at least 2 years”, The X Everything App Social Credit Score Dystopia: Musk Rebrand(ed) Twitter as “X” AND, “Disease X” Was Rehearsed at “Clade X”: A New “Pandemic” X https://t.co/l6gfbHQ4fX
MD ARAFAT MIA (@md87180_md)
@CHBMPorg How can AI and modern technology help uncover the hidden truths behind COVID-era decisions, preserve real evidence, and prevent such injustices from happening in the future
MD ARAFAT MIA (@md87180_md)
@CHBMPorg How can AI and modern technology help uncover the hidden truths behind COVID-era decisions, preserve real evidence, and prevent such injustices from happening in the future?
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg https://t.co/zAkgAQDKHP AND HERE IT IS… VIGILANT FOX has DISCOVERED the WISeR PROGRAM REPORT: Medicare will now PAY private companies to DENY medical care to seniors—with AI deciding who deserves to get treated. In January, a new pilot program begins in six states. It… https://t.co/x9sJ25VWAj
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
In a few moments, we will be reading the names of victims of COVID-related crimes against humanity who have documented stories with us who are facing the anniversary of their loved one's death today & over the next week. Help us honor their memories. 💔🎗️ https://t.co/C5kMDffwIO
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg https://t.co/HdyLFvta2p
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg https://t.co/iD2DLYe8ZS
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg The WEF’s Blueprint for a New Feudalism IS BEING SOLD as a “utopian upgrade for all”➡️IT’S NOT: INSTEAD, IT’S system of ABSOLUTE CONTROL that creates a class of slaves who cannot even cognitively rebel. The SYSTEM OF ABSOLUTE CONTROL IS PALANTIR + Digital ID/Biometrics + GDHCN…
COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (@CHBMPorg)
See the full list of those who have documented their stories with https://t.co/IKsYxyw6w9 & are facing the anniversaries of their loved ones death due to COVID-related crimes against humanity at https://t.co/TSNifpdecr, and please, help us share their stories. #COVIDCommonalities
Miriam Belknap (@BelknapM)
@CHBMPorg https://t.co/VRAoQgS1bC
Protocol Widow (@ProtocolWidow)
@CHBMPorg Anyone who listens to the tactics used to control people by intel agencies who also watched their loved one die under Covid, will recognize the similarities between mind control tactics & the protocols used on Covid patients. https://t.co/0lQiYWlpNn
Protocol Widow (@ProtocolWidow)
@CHBMPorg https://t.co/U5sZAylaKm Please review Grace's story at https://t.co/wHom86WbhL Please pray for the outcome the family needs at the next hearing.